Talk:4mm scale
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list |
||
 |
This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways.
|
||
 |
This page is within the scope of the Rail transport modelling task force. | ||
 |
An editor has requested that an image be added to this article. Please work with the Images task force to add a suitable image to this article. Once the requested image is added, remove the Imageneeded parameter from the {{TrainsWikiProject}} template call on this page to remove this image request. |
It's hard to quantify numbers but it has been stated on p4 talk by various manufacturers of 4mm scale modelling products that the rough breakdown of items sold seems to go: OO 85%, EM 10%, and P4 5%. So to say that P4 is the most popular scale amongst finescale modellers is somewhat disingenuous, I therefore removed that contention, because there are many who will contend that OO can be a finescale gauge (and if the sleeper spaceing is addressed and the layout is viewed from the side then this is a fair assertion. I added some informaiton about both P4 and EM, and linked the relavent societies including DOGA and DEMU together with the 3 main 4mm std gauge societies.
Rextanka 06:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC) rextanka
