User talk:47.230.0.45

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi. Your test worked, and has been reverted. Please note that wikipedia has a sandbox which was made for these types of tests. It would be appreciated if you perform all tests there in the future. If you have any further questions, please feel free to leave a note on my talk page. -Frazzydee 21:38, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Cool things was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 17:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Conceit, not concept

Check out the Wikipedia page for conceit to show why we've used that word in the Jeopardy! article. Andy Saunders 00:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to .jp has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 03:39, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Craig McCaw has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:57, 29 February 2008 (UTC)