User talk:4.249.9.152

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --Ixfd64 20:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Arggh. Just read that, and forgot about the 3rr. I am sorry Sir, I will have to continue this elsewhere. I've asked a few admins to help out, clearly this is not something we can resolve by ourselves. if you have any ideas on how to resolve it (other than totally your point of view), hit my talk page! I would be glad to hear it. HawkerTyphoon 20:15, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

I would recommend that both you and HawkerTyphoon (talk · contribs) read the guidelines on dealing with edit wars. --Ixfd64 20:20, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit Wars

Alright. We shouldn't argue about this; I am not Croatian and I have no intention of ever going there. I do, however, feel that the two paragraphs don't really have much do with the article in question: I think they rerad a bit like an arguement for a cetrtain point of view! From your standard of English, i'm assuming you're Croatian (No offence intended) - why do you want the paragraphs in? HawkerTyphoon 20:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC) They aren't, though - they're about justice for people who were oppressed in Croatia - an article on Fasicism in Germany shouldn't include two thirds on the holocaust compensation - it wouldn't make sense. Why DO you thinkt they should be in? What relation does the triasl have to Croatia? It's in the US, for pity's sake!:P

PS, I am sorry for enquiring as to your whereabouts. Regardless, If you are Croatian - or have more knowledge of it than me, I'd be happy to listen to your side of the arguement! HawkerTyphoon 20:40, 24 June 2006 (UTC)