User talk:4.244.36.110

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, 4.244.36.110, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Plrk (talk) 15:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] About SS Free

The reason the article is tagged for removal is that there are no indications as to why SS Free is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Please read the guidelines on notability for web sites. and provide some verifiable external sources for the article. Thanks! --Bonadea (talk) 15:26, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Its got over 30,000 members, how is that not notable?--4.244.36.110 (talk) 15:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
All I'm saying, and what I tried to show you by linking to the relevant information, is that the article has to include sources, neutral sources, to show notability. I'm certain the deleted article didn't mention anything about 30,000 members, and there were no sources. --Bonadea (talk) 15:34, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
i added like 12 sources, one of which is a rather popular book, so that shows that those sites werent bribed to put that on there--4.244.36.110 (talk) 15:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: stop

The article which I presume you are complaining about was deleted because it did not indicate why the subject was significant. If you can demonstrate that the subject meets Wikipedia:Notability (web) then it will be retained. I am not vandalising, I am acting within the speedy deletion policy. Hut 8.5 15:31, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Why would it be under web, its a company on the NY Stock Exchange?--4.244.36.110 (talk) 15:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Then show it meets Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Hut 8.5 15:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
It has half the members of Wikipedia (all Wikipedia's languages combined).--4.244.36.110 (talk) 15:34, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
It has over 500 individual wikis.--4.244.36.110 (talk) 15:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
You really need to find some sources indicating the notability of the organisation, as those pages I linked to will have said. Raw user statistics aren't enough. Hut 8.5 15:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Support more languages than Wikipedia. (over 1000 different language).--4.244.36.110 (talk) 15:40, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Read my last comment again. You need sources. Hut 8.5 15:43, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Ok, read the 10 billion online Encyclopedias they got, bam that cuonts as 10 billion sources, xgmx is so gonna make me a SS Free moderator for this!--4.244.36.110 (talk) 15:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
No it doesn't, we need sources about the website, not sources on the website. Hut 8.5 15:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Fine look at all the affiliates the SS Free has, all those sites consider the SS Free good enough to link to. Or just look at seperate wikis taht the SS Free doesn't own and are not hosted by the SS Free's wiki farm service.--4.244.36.110 (talk) 15:48, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
I want specific links to third-party websites meeting WP:RS with substantial coverage of the subject, as described in WP:N. And stop recreating that talk page or I'll protect it. Hut 8.5 15:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Then go on the SS Free's official website and click on affiliates, we actually have a helluva a lot more than that (if i remember right), but xgmx said he accidently deleted 95% of them a few days ago, plus google:link it.--4.244.36.110 (talk) 15:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
You can post the links here. And if you carry on creating abusive accounts and recreating that article's talk page I will block you. Hut 8.5 15:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
i cant do that, its a rather long list with about 500 urls, there all on one page on the site

SS Free--4.244.36.110 (talk) 15:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing/recreation of deleted material and likely sockpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.  Netsnipe  ►  16:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm not a sock, im a human being.--4.244.36.110 (talk) 16:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] omg

u tricked me into giving the url so u could block me because i was no longer needed.........how racist.--4.244.36.110 (talk) 16:02, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "no reason given"

Decline reason: "No reason given. Sam Korn (smoddy) 16:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


Note to admins: 4.244.42.103 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) was subsequently used to evade this block. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Offer of help

I started to leave this message:

If you would like to work on a new article that meets our rules, get a user account here, then leave me a note at User talk:A. B. and I will set up a temporary page for you where you can work on a draft until it's ready to go live as a "real article". For technical reasons, I can't do this unless you have a user account, however. As an administrator, I can even put a copy of the article version that was just deleted on that temporary page for you to save some time.
The main hurdle you will face is satisfying either of these (choose one) notability standards using "reliable sources" as defined by our very picky criteria (we're an encyclopaedia):
In the meantime, take a look at the Simplified Ruleset. We have a zillion policies and guideline, but that page will give you 90% of what you need to know; like the rest of us, you can muddle along and learn the rest as you go.

When I got finished, I found you'd already been involved in a running battle and gotten blocked. That's not the way to make friends or get things done around here.

As for calling people racist, I don't know where that comes from, but it's very inappropriate. You don't even know the race or nationality of half of us -- that stuff doesn't matter here. If you do that again, you'll be blocked further. If you keep trying to add this article without working through the system I outlined above, you'll trigger our spam defenses and force us to add the domain to our spam blacklist software filter.

We'd like to have you here, but we can't abide disruptive behaviour. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 16:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


We've blocked these accounts indefinitely as sockpuppets:
Here at Wikipedia, you use just one user name.
My offer above still stands if you'll calm down after your block expires. You'll need to register another user name, however, and not use it for further disruptive editing.
--A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Deleted pages:
  • Dune:Editor review/Xgmx
  • Encyclosearch
  • Wikipedia:Editor review/Xgmx
  • SS Free -- deleted 6 times


Domain:


Account:
--A. B. (talk • contribs) 18:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)