User talk:4.139.87.53

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Do not remove {{Replaceable fair use}} tags, as you did on Image:KE850.PNG, Image:KDor.JPG, Image:Leonatos.jpg, and Image:Tanith-ghosts-blist.gif. If you think the images are not replaceable, add {[tl|di-replaceable fair use disputed}} as the tag suggests, and discuss your reasons on the talk page. If you continue to remove these tags, in contravention of our policy, you can be blocked from editing. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Admin blocked because his tags were removed for not having the proper criteria to place them there. Thus, the tags were spam. Since this goes to content, i.e., he is improperly applying faulty tags without providing the necessary evidence to support them under verifiability, he has abused his power by blocking. Admin are not allowed to block in situations which they are involved in content disputes. The removal of his tags were fair, and he has still failed to provide proof to his claims that free images exist. Thus, he is spamming."

Decline reason: "What do tags and spam have to do with each other? Go reread your dictionary before coming back. — Kurykh 18:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Comment: this user is almost certainly a sockpuppet of the indefinitely blocked User:SanchiTachi. The initial edits were made to images uploaded by SanchiTachi and the agressive editing style (particularly the use of phrases about "breaking Wiki rules") is almost exactly the same as that of SanchiTachi. --Pak21 15:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
This user is confirmed to be SanchiTachi via an e-mail sent to me filled with blithering nonsense. —Kurykh 21:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)