Talk:40 Days and 40 Nights
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Who is Morgan Eastwood? What is his significance?Jarfingle 07:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Poster
the poster shows the title and related text in a verital shaft, very much insinuating an erect penis, i think this should be noted Qrc2006 23:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- Are you sure that needs verification? They make it pretty obvious. --KittyCollier 19:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with KittyCollier. Jarfingle 21:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Are you sure that needs verification? They make it pretty obvious. --KittyCollier 19:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- The screenshot needs a fair use rationale or may be deleted later. --Nehrams2020 05:05, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Trivialization of Rape
This seems to be a pretty clear-cut POV statement, so I'm removing it. Anyone disagree? Twin Bird 13:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC) I disagree. Since thats what they did.. He got raped then punished for it and nothing happened to the woman. How can anyone see a movie with a man doing the same and not having it criticized.
-
- Disagree, the film is controversial in that the sex was not consensual, and it's fair to point out that attitudes would have been different if the victim had been female or the attacker had been another male. Gomez2002 09:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- You have to prove that it was controversial. Find reliable sources complaining about it. While you're right it would have been different if the roles were reversed, you still need to prove it was controversial. DurinsBane87 03:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
-
Categories: Start-Class Canadian cinema articles | Low-importance Canadian cinema articles | Canadian cinema task force articles | Start-Class French cinema articles | Low-importance French cinema articles | French cinema task force articles | Start-Class film articles | Low-importance film articles