User talk:3d engineer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hi, 3d engineer, and welcome to Wikipedia!

On behalf of the Wikipedia community, I would like to thank you for your contributions. You're already off to great start. I see a future for you among the throngs of Wikipediholics! If you need assistance with titling new articles, please see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions go to Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ. If we've been so inattentive as to not have the answer in any of those places, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Finally, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.


[edit] Additional tips

Here are some extra tips to help you get familiar with Wikipedia.


You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and I hope to see you around.

Cuiviénen, Friday, 17 March 2006 @ 23:53 (UTC)

[edit] Vengeance engine

Like you said, the Unreal engine is a base. The article on the Vengeance engine explains that it is based on it. By the way, please sign your comments with ~~~~--Drat (Talk) 21:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unreal engine

Per your restoration of the previous version of the article, did you read Talk:Unreal_Engine_technology#Copyvio_comparison, and in particular Bunchofgrapes's comment that

Note that I said "in theory". Nysin is also right that that an article on another wiki is not a Reliable Source. The core Verifiability page says that information not verifiable from reliable sources does not belong in Wikipeida.

? Even if the copyright issue were to disappear, most of the article would be inappropriate in Wikipedia. Nysin 13:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Personal knowledge is not an allowed source for articles. Full stop. Please read and understand Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Verifiability. If you cannot understand these core policies, you should not edit Wikipedia. If you continue to revert the article to your preferred version, you may be blocked from editing (though it wouldn't be me who does the blocking, since I've been involved in the content dispute here.) —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 15:28, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Again

I see my previous message did not sink in.

Let me make this simple: Do not edit Unreal Engine unless if you also cite a Reliable Source for your information within the same edit. You have been given a great number of pointers to pages describing the core Wikipedia policies of No Original Research and WP:Verifiability, but have shown no indication of reading or understanding them. Stop wasting other editors' time, please. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 04:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Unreal Engine

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Unreal Engine. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Your original contributions are welcome. --Drat (Talk) 14:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Read this!

Before you make any futher edits like this one, you MUST provide and cite evidence for your claims, from reliable sources that can be independently verified. I don't care how much you know, even if you know more than the guys who coded the damned engine; Original research is forbidden on Wikipedia. People have asked you to follow the rules but you persist in not doing so.--Drat (Talk) 16:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cite your sources!

I see you still haven't gotten the hint after more than year. Either provide citations for your claims about the Unreal Engine and related articles or do not edit these articles. I don't care if you work with the engine on a daily basis (as your username implies); the rules apply to you as much as anyone else. Providing/changing information based wholly on your own expertise, with no reliable, independently verifiable sources is original research.--Drat (Talk) 02:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)