User talk:3bulletproof16/Archive 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Thank you

I really appreciate your taking the time to fix the images I tagged this morning. If you don't already know, I deleted a whole slew and tagged several others because the person who was uploading them was caught lying about the source and license of various images, and because very many of the images lacked an acceptable fair-use rationale even after we had told the uploader over and over again. There were a huge number of images, though, and so I did not have much time to spend on each one. Anyway, I really appreciate your efforts. --Yamla 16:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Adam1090 never got it. I saw a picture he put in Rey Mysterio's article, and I became incredibly suspicious, so I searched the photo on google, and found out it was copyrighted by a person whose pictures had been stolen in the past by other Wikipedia users claiming the photos to be there's. I found another one of these stolen from the same site by Adam1090, all the while alerting Yamla. No, I guess he didn't get it. Peace, Bmg916Speak 16:39, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Yeah I did the google search on User:Atticus SVU's images too. Thats how I found the site in the first place and alerted Yamla. -- bulletproof 3:16 16:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Good stuff. I just don't get after tons of warnings how a user could still not think we would find out and then re-block when we did. Bmg916Speak 16:45, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Apparently he thought he was the only one who knew how to do a google search...-- bulletproof 3:16 16:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Silly rabbit, tricks are for kids. Also, mind watching the John Cena article for me and bdve? User:Longkeys is being pointy, since apparently something he added some time ago was considered not notable and wbw, and deleting legit content based on the WP:PW warnings. Bmg916Speak 17:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Watched!-- bulletproof 3:16 17:18, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks :-) Bmg916Speak 17:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

RE: WWE Raw

Y Done Bmg916Speak 17:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

World Heavyweight Championship (WWE)

The source for the World Heavyweight Championship (WWE) at wwe.com does not state it is a new title. Check out the link for yourself, it says that it's lineage goes back to the WCW and NWA World title. We can't link to a source that has contrary information. - T-75|talk|contribs 03:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

See [1] Triple H is listed as the first champion. There is no question that the WHC is related to the WCW and NWA titles before it. That has already been established. However, it doesn't share their title history.-- bulletproof 3:16 03:30, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't disagree with you, that's why my edit said specifically what is said on the source listed...that its lineage can be traced back to those titles. I really don't want to mess with this article at the moment (maybe tomorrow), but I think what should be clarified is that it is the same belt, and essentially the same title, but under a different name. Just as Ric Flair is the "first" "WCW Champion," HHH is the first "World Heavyweight Chamption," but both of their titles trace their lineage back to the NWA Championship. - T-75|talk|contribs 03:35, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Before you misinterpret things any further let me just make this clear, lineage and title history are two very different things. Lineage is ancestry, confirming that the title is the successor to both the WCW and NWA championships. Title history specifically refers to the champions who have held the title (not belt). Because the WHC's title history and the WCW WHC's title history is clearly not the same, the World Heavyweight Championship is a new belt created from the legacy of the previous two titles. This has already been made clear in the article.-- bulletproof 3:16 03:48, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
If the reason why WWE doesn't list former WCW/NWA Champions in the World Heavyweight Title's history page is because the title was renamed, then why would WWE list former WCW Light Heavyweight and WCW Cruiserweight champions in the history page of the WWE Cruiserweight title if the championship has been renamed multiple times throughout it’s history?-- bulletproof 3:16 03:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't believe the article was clear, I think the article left it quite vague. The way I edited the article did not contradict what you are saying, all my edit said was that the lineage came from the previous two titles. I understand it is a different title, but just as the WCW title traced its lineage to the NWA, and the TNA Title (and WWF title for that matter) trace its lineage to the NWA Title, the WHC Title traces its lineage to the WCW and NWA title. - T-75|talk|contribs 04:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Lineage? Yes. Title History? In this case, No. That's what stated not only in the article but also on WWE.com.-- bulletproof 3:16 04:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Reread my edit, I don't believe I wrote that the title history went back, but that the lineage did. The article as you have it was (and as you undid it back to) does not clearly acknowledge that, it only acknowledges it as a possiblity. Additionally, the source listed for the part of the article I edited does not match with what the article said. - T-75|talk|contribs 04:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
The link from "the championship does not inherit the title history of the two belts" takes you to the WHC's history page which shows that it doesn't inherit the title history of the two titles. The link from "However, it has been made clear that it is the successor to both titles" takes you to the WCW WHC's history page which reads at the top "The World Heavyweight Championship that has recently been carried by such greats as Batista, Chris Benoit and Triple H got its start in WWE back in 2002. But its prestigious lineage can actually be traced back all the way to George Hackenschmidt and 1904. For years, it was known as the NWA Championship; then when WCW pulled out of the NWA in the early 1990s, Ric Flair was recognized as the first-ever WCW Champion. Since that time, top names such as Hulk Hogan, Ron Simmons and Bret Hart carried the championship prior to WCW's demise." which also shows that the WHC is a new title and that the title is related to the WCW/NWA titles which confirms succession. However I will tweak the article to make the lineage thing clearer. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I think we are necessarily disagreeing with each other; I just think the article was vague and wasn't clear that the lineage traced itself back to the WCW/NWA World Titles. My main concern is that the sourced linked in the footnotes (#2 that you quoted) does not say the same thing isn the article as it says in the source. - T-75|talk|contribs 04:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I'll fix it then.-- bulletproof 3:16 04:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Correction made -- bulletproof 3:16 04:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for working with me, I'm not trying to be a pain in the rear, just trying to make sure we keep things in the project as straight as possible so that those outside the project (who don't like the project) away from us. - T-75|talk|contribs 04:43, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
It's no problem really. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:45, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Punisher Dice Morgan

I've put out a protect request, hopefully it'll stop those IP and new user vandals that seem to be plaguing the page at the moment. Darrenhusted 00:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

And cheers for the JB revert. Darrenhusted 00:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Jeff Hardy/WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008

Jeff has been mentioned in an article ([2]), but really not confirmed. The roster is being based on claims from the wrestlers themselves, interviews with developers, and mentions in articles from reputable websites. Socby19 19:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Socby19

Thanks for the source.-- bulletproof 3:16 19:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Benoit

Ugh, some people insist on including non-notable mentions of his death in so many articles, like WrestleMania XX. I will have to wait a few hours to remove it or I will violate 3RR because it's not technically vandalism. TJ Spyke 22:53, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Twice I've asked for protection and they ended up calling it a content dispute. Darrenhusted 21:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Doctor Krabs is a gonner

Just to let you know, indefinete IP block. -- Oakster  Talk  18:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Damm it

That sonnuva bi***! I hope you can come back man. --User:Atomic Religione

As soon as this is taken care of... 3BP16 (75.85.59.154) 00:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Account hacked

If there's something I can help you with, please let me know. You can create a new account with totally unrelated details then use the e-mail user function to contact me. --Deskana (talk) 22:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I'll try. This guy really got me good. For the past couple of weeks I've had to renew my passwords on various sites including photobucket and youtube. I've lost quite a bit of things because of this. -- 3BP16 (75.85.59.154) 00:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
I think you are right about who did this. Let me know if I can help at all. Remember what we talked about on MSN? Maybe you do it. TJ Spyke 04:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Thats the problem. I can't log into MSN, Yahoo, AIM, YouTube, Photobucket or anything! I've been crippled...-- 3BP16 (75.85.59.154) 05:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Please monitor the page to see if anything comes up guys. -- 3BP16 (75.85.59.154) 06:06, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Oh, I thought you just couldn't log into this account. You can't log into anything? That must suck. I hope you find out for sure who did this, and do whatever you can (contact their ISP, report them to authorities, etc.). TJ Spyke 06:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
YES! I got Yahoo back! The password he put was bULLETpROOFsUCKS... 0.o -- 3BP16 (75.85.59.154) 12:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
I've blocked this account as possibly compromised. --Deskana (talk) 00:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks at least now my name cant be used. -- 3BP16 (75.85.59.154) 00:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
I did it because I'm not sure I believe you are who you say you are, so thanking me might not be appropriate. --Deskana (talk) 00:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
What? So after all the things we've been through with Wiki-star, Dragon Emperor, and Taracka back when we first met? -- 3BP16 (75.85.59.154) 00:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
It doesn't matter what I think, really. If/when you get control of the account back, e-mail me or leave a message here and I'll unblock. --Deskana (talk) 00:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
I understand, thanks anyway. -- 3BP16 (75.85.59.154) 00:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
I've been sitting here for the past couple of hours and I finally managed to get my MSN account back. All of these passwords are apparently insults directed at me. Deskana if you have MSN messenger my SN is bulletproof3_16 -- 3BP16 (75.85.59.154) 01:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

At hotmail dot com? I added you as a contact. --Deskana (talk) 01:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Correct.-- 3BP16 (75.85.59.154) 02:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you Deskana. I appreciate everything you did for me today-- bulletproof 3:16 04:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

DBZ Articles

Im sorry to hear that your account was hacked into. Anyway since you are one of the major DBZ article contributors I was wondering if you knew why most of the articles are turning into crap and why alot of the character articles are dissapearing. I tried to change some of this but to no avail. User: jwhyte1

I have no idea. I'm gone for a few weeks and I come back to find the Broly article has been deleted...-- 3BP16 (75.85.59.154) 05:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks Bullet. I'm glad to be back, The Hybrid 00:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

My Apologies

I didn't know you reverted it. Sorry about that. Ryu

No prob. No worries. -- bulletproof 3:16 17:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

I Understand, BUT...

...yet, the matches are still added as announced.--Hornetman16 21:04, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

...Never said they weren't. Just saying that by adding "Check Back as Matches are Announced" makes Wikipedia sound like a news site, something that Wikipedia is not. -- bulletproof 3:16 21:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
can't we leave the subsection heading?--Hornetman16 21:18, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
No hurry for that. WWE should start building towards the event this week. -- bulletproof 3:16 21:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for the inform.--Hornetman16 21:21, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Question

I believe this user's userpage violate policy. Just want an opinion.--Hornetman16 04:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Tough one. I think you should ask Deskana. My head's tired. I need to sleep. Night.-- bulletproof 3:16 05:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Why?

Why are you going around and taging every title picture?--Hornetman16 (talk) 21:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable means replaceable.-- bulletproof 3:16 21:58, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Some of those photo's have been here since I've started here...Why the sudden change?--Hornetman16 (talk) 23:34, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Because up until now we had no other way to replace them. Now we have users buying the replicas and taking pictures of them. Works just as well.-- bulletproof 3:16 23:36, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry but I think that's BS as in THEY WERE FINE.--Hornetman16 (talk) 23:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Then I guess policy is BS.-- bulletproof 3:16 23:48, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
At times...but I'll follow it.--Hornetman16 (talk) 23:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Sorry Aaron but policy is policy. -- bulletproof 3:16 16:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Thebiggestwwefan

Thanks for this revert, that guy had been a pain in the a-double crooked letter, but now is indef blocked. Darrenhusted 12:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Must have been a real pain dealing with this troll. Glad you're doing fine though.-- bulletproof 3:16 16:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Dave Meltzer is not a reliable source?

"Per admin comments in talk page and WP:PW. Dave is not a reliable source" Could you please point me to where this is stated? Why is a published author, regularly used guest for talk shows when wrestling is discussed, and newspaper columnist not reliable? It is true Meltzer may not have the best grammar in the world and some may not agree with his match ratings but he is pretty much universally accepted as a good source even by haters. I think the majority of the IWC would agree that he is reliable enough to put the number at 78,000-ish. It seems the minority is trying to strong arm the popular opinion. RedBirdI55 17:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry but that’s just our community's consensus. Talk:WrestleMania III. Maybe try a pro wrestling wiki? -- bulletproof 3:16 17:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm not going to change the article, but 3 people are the community consesus? Plus I don't see anyone else saying he is not reliable. I just don't see how something that is cited well can be easily dismissed. Do you honestly believe Vince told the truth here? It is very common for promotors and events to exaggerate figures by at least 11%. That would knock it down to 83K but still. I don't think this is all a big earth-shattering deal but Meltzer is as a much a reliable source in wrestling as ESPN is in sports... ok maybe not a good comparison but it is hard to compare anything to wrestling. I encourage you if you ever get the chance to read one of the books that talks about how Meltzer came across this figure. Maybe then you could see he had no malice or motive in his reporting. RedBirdI55 17:33, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
I've read his book, however I've also read the official lease papers for the Silverdome on the day of March 29, 1987 saying a crowd of over 85,000 is expected. That’s a 10,000 more than Meltzer's reported number. Now, one is saying one thing and another is saying another, so its just best to keep it neutral and leave a note saying the number is disputed, which is what is already in the article. -- bulletproof 3:16 17:39, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Sounds fair, but I think a sentence or two would help expand the dispute reference. No more than 2 or 3 sentences though. Maybe, Dave Meltzer has disputed the WWE's claim stating that the number may be closer to blah blah blah following conversations he had with the event's promotor Zane Bresloff? (with citation added from one of his book or some other book) How does that sound? RedBirdI55 17:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Meh. Unnecessary really, because Dave Meltzer has disputed everything WWE has claimed about attendance figures including WrestleMania 23's number. Besides Meltzer is just that journalist and has no say over any decisions WWE makes. The article says the number is disputed which makes it perfectly clear that there are some that don’t believe the attendance number is real. -- bulletproof 3:16 18:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Well technically Meltzer has had say when he worked for them in international relations but that is just being a smartass on my part. I wanted to put in it because it is uncited and could be removed without citation. Meltzer disputes things that are untrue because thats an important job of that profession. RedBirdI55 18:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Ha, no worries. Tell you what, I'll cite it with a third party source that's neither WWE nor Meltzer.-- bulletproof 3:16 18:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Good find on that source RedBirdI55 18:33, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you.-- bulletproof 3:16 18:34, 27 July 2007 (UTC)


Stone Cold

Why did you move Steve Austin (wrestler) back to the less appropratie heading of Stone Cold Steve Austin? Stone Cold is only a nickname he has been using in the WWF/E, whereas Steve Austin has been used for almost all of his professional wrestling career. See my point? Many other people agree with me. George bennett 13:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Please don't perform page moves without forming a consensus first. Thank you. -- bulletproof 3:16 11:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Its best that all memebers of WP:PW be involved in forming a consensus before the page is moved. Cheers. -- bulletproof 3:16 16:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC)


WWF InVasion

I wonder why it was billed as the inaugral brawl then?--Hornetman16 (talk) 19:53, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't know. WWE has a weird way of promoting their events. O.o-- bulletproof 3:16 19:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Super Saiyan 2 Vegetto

See this discussion. [3] Even the Daizenshuus, which are the official encyclopedia books on all things Dragon Ball, state that the only individuals to ever achieve Super Saiyan 2 were Gohan, Goku, and Vegeta in that order. Sorry but per Wikipedia:Verifiability, the consensus is correct and stands. You can speculate all you want, but you are not going to convince us to go against something that has already been confirmed by the series’ creators. -- bulletproof 3:16 03:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

First, that is the exact section I read before and considered to be absolutely ridiculous. Second, I looked around the internet and looked up this Dragonball "Daizenshuus" you mentioned. The first thing I found out of this is the "Official Dragonball Z power levels". Then I notice a couple things (I'm sorry if I'm coming off as pissy, it is not my intention).

  1. 1 According to the Daizenshuus, Goten is by far much stronger than Gohan at their base stages. It says "Son Gohan: 3,000,000" and then further down "Son Goten: 30,000,000". I don't know about you, but I have just a little bit of a hard time believing this.
  1. 2 Also according to the Daizenshuus, SSJ2 Vegeta is much stronger than SSJ2 Goku. It says "Son Goku Super Saiyan 2: 401,000,000" then when I go down further "Vegeta Super Saiyan 2: 425,000,000". Now I may not be a Dragonball Z genius, but I am pretty damn sure that that cannot be true judging from the fights I have seen the two characters in at that level. At most, all they could be is equal at Super Saiyan 2.
  1. 3 There is absolutely NO mention of Vegetto's Super Saiyan level(s) in these Daizenshuus. There is only "Vegetto: 600,000,000", and you and I both know that there most definitely is at least one Super Saiyan Vegetto level.

Also there is no mention of Majin Vegeta.

These all come from the Official "Dragonball Daizenshuus" you speak of. This shows that maybe this Official book may not be as accurate as you think. I did not find an official copy of Super Saiyan levels and who achieved them, but if the creator put as much thought into the Super Saiyan levels section as the power levels section, we may have another inaccurate section on our hands (he may have possibly forgotten to put Vegetto in the known Super Saiyan 2s section).

I can't come out and prove you completely wrong because in the show Vegetto never comes out and blatantly states that he is in his Super Saiyan 2 form. He only says "Call me Super Vegetto". But I can prove that no regular Super Saiyan can have the sparks of electricity like a Super Saiyan 2 and 3 can, and that Vegetto did have those sparks (as you have hopefully seen by now with the video and pics I posted in the discussion section).

I am not a member of WikiProject Dragon Ball like you are, so I have no control over what you decide to do, and I can understand why you would not want to include Vegetto in the known Super Saiyan 2s section considering that he is technically not in the official Dragonball Daizenshuus as you insist he is not, but may I suggest that we possibly include Vegetto's name at the bottom of the list of known Super Saiyan 2s with the words "Unofficial" or "Unofficially" next to it.

Again, it is your call and not mine. I will not push this debate any further after this message as it is really not actually that big of a deal. But I would be grateful if you considered my suggestion.--Lucky Mitch 05:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

The problem with that is that Wikipedia:No Original Research doesn't not allow that. Unofficially, Officially: bottom line is that it implies speculation. You say, "Maybe they just forgot to put him in". That’s Original Research too. Who are we to speculate what might have happened? Wikipedia has a strong policy against adding Unverifiable info. We just have to go with what they give us, I'm afraid. Vegetto did not refer to himself as a Super Saiyan 2, {just as Super Vegetto) therefore he is listed as a Super Saiyan only along with Gogeta.-- bulletproof 3:16 06:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)


xx

I wasn't the one who started the personal attacks. --Endlessdan 20:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Regardless of who started, calling a person a douche is unacceptable. However, I will keep and eye on Hernetman16. -- bulletproof 3:16 20:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC)


Thanks

Thanks for taking care of that comment for me.--Hornetman16 (talk) 20:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

No worries.-- bulletproof 3:16

John Cena infobox image

Could you please comment on which image you would prefer to be featured in the infobox on John Cena's page. Thanks.-- Kip Smithers 22:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

I'll take a look at it.-- bulletproof 3:16 22:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you.-- Kip Smithers 22:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Championship Infobox

can't it be 300 unless otherwise posted?--Hornetman16 (talk) 03:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

how bout a compromise at say...225-250?--Hornetman16 (talk) 03:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
THANK YOU!! Ahhh...the magic of discussion. --Hornetman16 (talk) 03:23, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Do you know

Do you know if I can create a new page.--HBKH 15:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)HHBKH

help moving

I need you to move Dallas Page to Diamond Dalls Page per consensuss on the talk page.--Hornetman16 (talk) 22:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

3-2 is nowhere near consensus, not to mention 2 days is not enough time to obtain consensus for a move. Bmg916Speak 22:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Especially the two day part (even though I'm in favor of the move). Mshake3 22:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
What they said^ ^. -- bulletproof 3:16 22:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
When can I call it closed? How long? How big a difference?--Hornetman16 (talk) 22:40, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
5 days if no consensus is apparent sooner than that. -- bulletproof 3:16 22:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Let me know if you think a consensus is aparent.--Hornetman16 (talk) 23:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
It's been five days the discussion is now closed and the ruling is...drumroll please...TO MOVE. Could you do it since the redirect page has to be deleted first.--Hornetman16 (talk) 20:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
I just got back from Chicago, give me a second. -- bulletproof 3:16 01:07, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Darren Matthews pic

As much as I really agree with what you did we do need another pic that you can see his face with.--Hornetman16 (talk) 23:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

True, any ideas on where to find one?-- bulletproof 3:16 03:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
No idea.--Hornetman16 (talk) 04:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
I got somewhat of an idea. Google Image search?--Hornetman16 (talk) 04:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Request a Block

I request JPG-GR be blocked for 12 hours for being disruptive.--Hornetman16 (talk) 04:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Strongly suggest you don't do that, Hornetman, lest you be blocked yourself - Alison ☺ 04:56, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
You gota admit he was disruptive for about 5 minutes there. I withdrawl my request out of respect to JPG-GR.--Hornetman16 (talk) 04:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Again, he was attempting to have a discussion with you. Regardless, that sounds like a good idea.-- bulletproof 3:16 05:02, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Two matters

Dear 3bulletproof16/Archive 3, you are invited to join the move request for Goku since it's been much slower than expected. I also asked something at WP:WPDB and thought you could help in seeking the answer. Much thanks, Lord Sesshomaru 02:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Will take a look at it.-- bulletproof 3:16 02:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for everything, I warned that ip you reverted. Been needing some thoughts at this section and it would be appreciated if you could be available for comment, that is, if you'd like to. Lord Sesshomaru 04:16, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey man how's it going

Just stopping by to say hey and thank you for your help with the AM Raw logo awhile back. I was hoping to ask you to comment on my current rfa that I have out. With all your barnstars and kindness I would really appreciate your opinion. Later JakeDHS07 20:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)JakeDHS07

No problem. Will take a look at it. Cheers!-- bulletproof 3:16 23:28, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: The doctor is back

Hey there. Sorry about the long delay for a reply but I've been taking a month break from Wikipedia just to clear my head. About Krabs, I think I might have an idea what the new IP address is. I have a suspicion it's 68.44.84.185 (talk · contribs) due to similar edits (some of them hinting straw puppetry) and this address locating to New Jersey (just like the old IP address). I'll try to put a CheckUser for Bratz12 for this tomorrow, but while I'm here has there been any other accounts vandalising as well as this? -- Oakster  Talk  23:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for that. However, theres a block notice on his talkpage, yet hw hasn't been blocked. I've contacted the admin involved. Davnel03 11:51, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah I forgot to remove it. Thanks -- bulletproof 3:16 21:15, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

ECW championship image (no, not that)

Why did you switch it from the McMahon image? It seems to me you can see the main plate better in that one than the Lashley one, especially in the thumb.«»bd(talk stalk) 23:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Are you sure it was introduced in July?

Rob Van Dam, 21 day reign, June 13, 2006-July 4, 2006 - User:sepmix 22:41 22 August, 2007 (GMT)

Poetic's RFA

Finally, Poetic is nominated check it out here :Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Poetic Decay. Atomic Religione 19:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Good for him! I wish my friend the best. -- bulletproof 3:16 20:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Ugh

I saw what you ment so I went and rewrote my statement, I was to caught up in the moment to Think. I hope I haven't damaged his odds. Ugh, such idiocy on my part..... DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 21:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

In a un related note ...

Will you sign my signature book?. --ÄtΘmicR€£igionesїgñ

Haha, Sure!-- bulletproof 3:16 21:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

MSN

You should come on MSN sometime. I've not seen you on it for a bit. :-) --Deskana (banana) 03:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Quite frankly I haven't had the time to get on it. I've been busy with moving to a new house and doing a lot of traveling. I got back from Chicago just a few days ago. I try to get on it when I can. I'll be on it this weekend for sure though. Happy B-Day BTW! Damn man! Unlimited alcohol! God bless the UK indeed! -- bulletproof 3:16 03:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Dave Bautista

Would you please give Dave Bautista a once over. It received heavy editing today by unregistered users and may benefit from a good review. Thanks. -- Jreferee (Talk) 00:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Dragon Ball Z

Dragon Ball Z has received some heavy editing recently. Would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee (Talk) 18:54, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back

Good to see you back. After I finally returned, I was dissapointed to see that you hadn't edited in several weeks. TJ Spyke 03:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Up to date?

Hello, I see you have made some improvements to Citrus Bowl.

I notice the article contains this statement, "The most recent was The Rolling Stones in December 1997." Is that still up to date? There hasn't been a major concert there for at least 10 years? If that is false it should be updated. If it is true then it would be interesting if we could explain why this venue is no longer hosting major concerts. Best, Johntex\talk 00:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

User:Bratz12 = User:Shawty18?

Hiya, I'm not as knowledgeable about User:Bratz12 or anything like that, but a moment ago, I came across User:Shawty18, who appears to be adding false information into articles en masse. Again, I'm not too familiar with User:Bratz12's Modus operandi or anything, having never heard of him/her before today, but both appear to have edited similar articles. See, for example, the edits of Bratz12 [4] (which you reverted) and Shawty18 [5] on Bratz 4 Real. Or, on Bratz: Movie Starz, Bratz12 [6] [7] and Shawty18 [8] [9]. Which has now been redirected (by Shawty18) to Bratz: The Movie (video game), where he has made changes such as [10] [11] [12] and [13]. The list goes on, and on. The additions of "announced soundtrack" sections, with a comment saying all additions must have a source, with additions added without sources; the user name similarities; and the fact that they have edited similar articles, all seem suspicious to me. Would you be able to have a bit more of a look into things, see what you think? --Dreaded Walrus t c 00:39, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

It appears this guy is a Sockpuppet of Krabs502. He seems to be moving into the two Disney Princess Games and the movie Enchanted (made by Disney). His gimmick seems to be adding Chamillioniare into the soundtrack of Disney movies and adding that Bratz/Disney videogames were created by EA with ESPN Integration
Here is a small list of pages he has added with spam/vandalism/non-sense
A lot of his edits are also very sly wherein the data he puts in _could_ be factual but is most likely not correct, such as inputting incorrect ESRB/PEGI ratings to videogames or adding in that the videogames will be coming out for consoles that really are not coming out for that console.
There are also tons of Bratz articles that I'm pretty sure are incorrect but I have no clue about anything Bratz related.
Here is his contrib page
This guy is obviously not editing these articles in good faith but since I'm still pretty new to Wikipedia I do not know how to pull up this guys past sockpuppet list on this page Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets. Can you help to report this guy as a sockpuppet of Krabs502/spammer?
Also, Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Krabs502
Strongsauce 11:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Figured out how to file an SSP Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/216.83.121.194_(5th) and submitted an AIV so I guess you can just ignore this in that regard. Strongsauce 15:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Misunderstanding

Sorry about the misunderstanding we had earlier, and hope it is all settled now. If you wish to help me with One Night Stand (2006), you are very welcome to. Peace, Davnel03 19:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

No worries. I can see how things got a bit heated there as a result of miscommunication. Again no worries and congrats on a fine ONS 05 article. Cheers! -- bulletproof 3:16 19:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. Also, I was wondering if you could look over December to Dismember (2006) at some point as it is currently up for peer review. Thanks in advance, Davnel03 19:34, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Now that all of this is taken care of, WELCOME BACK BULLETPROOF!!! The Hybrid 19:40, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

The Hybrid has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.


Tables

How good are you with tables? The Hybrid 08:10, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

I need to know how to make one truly invisible, since a white background shows up in the wiki. I'm mediating a dispute, and the best compromise hinges on my ability to make a truly invisible table. BTW, you're welcome for the smile :) The Hybrid 08:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Here's a basic table:

Oh my God! Oh my God! Oh my God! Oh my God!




As you can see, it's background shows up, though faintly. I need to know how to get rid of that. Do you know how? The Hybrid 08:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Help desk did it for me, sooo

The Hybrid has given you the blank stare and no longer cares what you say. Possibly due to Hanlon's razor, which states "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.", or because this user knows he is correct no matter what you say. Spread the indifference by ignoring someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. The Hybrid 08:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
What?-- bulletproof 3:16 08:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Lol, you're really out of it, aren't you? Anyway, I was poking around the talk page for {{smile}}, and ran across that thing. So, I've put it at User:The Hybrid/Blank, and use it whenever it seems like it would be funny. I also have User:The Hybrid/Finger. Cheers, The Hybrid 08:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Nite, The Hybrid 08:28, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

LOL, Thanks Hybrid. You made my day!-- bulletproof 3:16 08:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Justapunk

Hey, not sure if I should speak to you about this but Just (who I think you've dealt with before) is on my case about the Australian Wrestling Federation article. If you look on his discussion page you can see what we've said so far. I only am bringing this to your attention because you've dealt with him before. It just doesnt seem like he wants to help build the article. He just wants to reverse all the work I've put in and rub it in my face...

Thanks Parradudes

Bullet, if you take a look at my talk page, and the history of Parradudes - it would appear that he is keen to ignore the WP:NPOV rules to get this off the ground. I got a third opinion - which is also on my talk page. My view is that the article can not be saved. I have searched for sources and found nothing outside the AWF website and fan sites. That is why I have queried it's notability. I even query if any Australian wrestling promotion can pass the notability rules to be honest. In my opinion Parradudes has been quite rude to me, but I'm not complaining. He just has to get some third party sources going - but I wish him luck on that! !! Justa Punk !! 09:39, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject Digimon

At Wikiproject Digimon, we are about to undergo a large project and we wish to see how many people wish to help and contribute. If you wish to help please sign here. Trainra 06:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Hornetman suspicions

Since I hadn't really paid attention to Monit's editing patterns I was actually suspecting Lex94 of being a Hornetman sock, I could be wrong but I get the same kinda vibe off him. MPJ-DK 04:30, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

About my Respectlis

That was just for Mikedk9109, not you or the others, I'll better organize it ok :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by BionicWilliam (talk • contribs) 20:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

MSN

I just haven't had much time to chat, so I haven't signed in. If you do ever want to chat on MSN, just let me know (e-mailing me or contacting me here). I will add the page to my watchlist. TJ Spyke 19:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Images

Can I put in free images?--Hardcore Hak 14:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem

Yeah, i'll watch the page. I guess some people don't realize that you are allowed to delete anything on your talkpage (although I do think that non-vandalism should be archived instead). TJ Spyke 05:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

RE: Your talk page

Yea, I'll take a look out when I can, no problem. Bmg916Speak 15:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

It is on my watchlist already. I'll pay special attention to it whenever I'm on. Cheers, The Hybrid T/C 20:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

hey

Is your user name from the adam sandler and waynes brothers movie bulletproof. Prince Of All Saiyans 16:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

LOL, no but good try though. It’s actually a reference to Stone Cold Steve Austin. Bullet Proof was what was printed on the back of the vest he wore during his entrance for his last match. -- bulletproof 3:16 02:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

WrestleMania XIX

While it was three rock bottoms, they were all broken up with pinfall attempts. Therefore, it's only one rock bottom. I say this because it's apparently agreed that only the moves after the final non-sucessful pinfall attempt count (see Cyber Sunday (2007)). Mshake3 01:57, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Never noticed this was agreed upon. Nevermind then.-- bulletproof 3:16 01:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


WWE Brand Extension and WWE Draft

what do you think we can do to the articles to improve them, or are they good as they are?--TrUcO9311 (talk) 17:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Ok I did, now check them out and tell me if they are good to remove the under construction tags.

Oh and do you want me to archive your talk page?--TrUcO9311 (talk) 18:14, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

I suggest getting a bot to automatically archive your talk page. I use Werdnabot, User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Howto. TJ Spyke 18:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Wow, they've got bots that can do that now?-- bulletproof 3:16 18:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Yep. You can choose how many days after having no replies a discussion will be archived and where it will be archived to. I have mine set so that the bot will archive any section that hasn't had a reply in 7 days. You can copy the code right from my talk page if you want to make sure you don't get it wrong. TJ Spyke 18:30, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Sure, I'll give it a try. Thanks!-- bulletproof 3:16 18:30, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

OK

Now I understand about the images, thanks. Thebluesharpdude--Thebluesharpdude (talk) 03:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Wrestlemania XXIV

I believe 223. I don't have the ticket in front of me at the moment. The ticket I scanned is from a group of seats I bought. For big events like this, I buy several tickets and sell em later on StubHub to pay for my trip. Where are you seated? --Endless Dan 13:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

User:HBK1961

He seems like a sockpuppet to me based on his edits (which are mostly vandalism BTW), what do you think? TJ Spyke 20:01, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanksgiving

A little late, but...

User:Alex Roggio/Thanksgiving

02:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Well

If I'm on I'll keep an eye on the account, but I'm going inactive for a little while. I'll check my talk page every day, but I'm not going to be doing much else. If all hell breaks loose contact me, and I'll pull out my hell-broken-loose axe and see what I can do, but otherwise I'll just be replying, and not taking any action. Peace, and happy day after Thanksgiving :). The Hybrid T/C 07:15, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Checkuser and blocked I see. Good. I won't be saying anything else per WP:RBI and WP:DNFTT, but I have removed his comments from WPT:PW, and your talk page (feel free to put them back if you feel I was wrong to do so). Gotta love ban evading socks... Bmg916Speak 16:21, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Ah good, good good good. BTW, Bmg, when a user evades a ban an admin rollback is performed on their contributions, so it would have been reverted anyway. Cheers, The Hybrid T/C 21:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008

I noticed the WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008 has been having some IP vandalism issues. Do you think it is enough to warrant a semi-protect? Let me know. Nikki311 19:17, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I thought so, but that page isn't on my watchlist, so I wasn't 100% sure. I semi-protected it for two weeks. If anything else every needs it, let me know. I trust your judgment. Nikki311 20:22, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Koavf

Not a big deal, but keep a small eye on certain articles. This user is going around on Wikipedia and moving all articles of people who use initials in their name (like T.J. Perkins and B.J. Whitmer) and putting spaces in their name (like T. J. Perkins). He's not focusing on wrestling articles, but all articles. He is citing WP:NC (p) as his reason, even though that section is in dispute. TJ Spyke 05:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

PAST

Livin in the past, are we?--72.186.91.215 (talk) 06:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Seems to be something you've been doing a lot. -- bulletproof 3:16 06:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I told you I'd block you on PWW if you edited here anymore. I'm surprised that you thought I was bluffing. The Hybrid T/C 06:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

That's what I was banning him for; disruption. While you may not hate him, you aren't the only one he's targeted, and even without the hate any edits by him are disruptive de facto because it's him. Anyway, banning him over a grudge would be an abuse of power, which I, as a Libertarian, would never do. Peace, The Hybrid T/C 06:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I know you didn't mean anything by it, nor were you suggesting that I was blocking him over a grudge. I just like citing my Libertarian beliefs in this type of discussion to show exactly how seriously I take the more forceful aspects of holding power. Anyway, I think that there is more to this than simply the policy aspects. I, personally, don't report non-disruptive sockpuppets, as I believe everyone deserves another chance at redemption. There is no such thing as too much forgiveness. Once a person shows that they haven't changed, however, I show no mercy. That is why I don't show Hornetman any mercy; by claiming to have changed every time, and always showing he hasn't, he has proven that he doesn't deserve anymore forgiveness, so he will not receive any from me. He is the type of person that tries to walk on forgiving people, so I am also showing him that when intelligence is applied to forgiveness people like him end up on the absolute bottom of the pile. The Hybrid T/C 07:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I have a question, this guy "Hornetman" almost blocked me when I first came to Wikipedia. But what did he do wrong? I dont get it even when I read the logs. (Personally, I dont like this guy.)?TrUcO9311 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)


Hi!

Zenlax has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'd like to thank you for signing my guestbook. Zenlax T C S 20:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

You got a Christmas card! → → →


Sig

Where did you go to make your signature? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truco9311 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

RE:Wasup?

Oh, you haven't missed much. I took a 4 day break this week myself. You missed me blowing up at Chronic, and then apologizing for it. My interview is also coming out in this week's newsletter. Other than that, I don't think you've really missed much. Hornetman is already blocked indef on the PW Wikia, and since he's continued his sockpuppetry I won't be unblocking him, ever. Anyways, I hope you had a nice Christmas, and happy New Years Eve to you as well! Cheers, SexySeaBass 08:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

You found it too, eh?

Have a great New Year 3bulletproof16/Archive 3.
 Here's to a bright and prosperous 2008!

From, SexySeaBass 08:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh my God, that made me laugh so hard! Oh, wow. Cheers, SexySeaBass 08:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

RE: New Year

Thanks for the message! Happy New Year. Nikki311 18:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

RE: Bring on the '08

The Chronic has given you a bottle of Cristal! Cristal costs $350, and hopefully this bottle has made your New Year's Day better. Spread the spirit of the New Year by giving a bottle of Cristal to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Give a bottle of Cristal to someone else by adding {{subst:User:The Hybrid/Finger}} to their talk page with a friendly... wait...

Happy New Year's

I would like to return the happy new years, but my short name is not Bionic it's BioWill, but still no hard feelings.

BionicWilliam (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

And a happy and healthy new beer (uh...year?) to you and yours bulletproof :-). Bmg916Speak 01:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Contributions to Royal Rumble (2008)

Please do not delete the background week to week information. It is important that it be there so that it is clear just how personal the match will be. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 15:51, 4 January 2008 (EDST)

List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball

King Vegeta, Onio, Seripa, Toma, etc., if you don't mind my asking, how do they pass in notability? I removed some of the minour character pics because we can't have so many images due to this guideline (far as I'm concerned, we shouldn't have any). Can you please respond here or on TTN's talk? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 01:49, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, I was just giving TTN a hand. I'll remove the images, but do you think we should list every character possible? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Never mind the images, I'll let someone else do it. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Okay, I guess it's fine where it stands. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Uncivil user

I blocked that user for incivility. I warned him yesterday for similar behavior. He's been blocked for 72 hours. Once the block is up, let me know if he continues his personal attacks. Nikki311 15:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

VG lists reply

Today is fine with me. RobJ1981 (talk) 23:38, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

If a game doesn't have a sequel, then what? The prose for Smackdown vs Raw 2008 revolves around new and returning characters and nothing else. WWF WrestleFest is one example of a game with no true sequel, but features a tiny roster. So I suppose listing all of the roster in prose would work fine. But a game with a bigger roster, such as WWF No Mercy would be a different prose. Listing people as the teams they are in could be one way to go, to help prevent a bigger prose just listing every person. Also, I think listing non-playables isn't useful (and I've only seen it personally on wrestling and a few fighting articles I believe). Thoughts? RobJ1981 (talk) 23:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I've managed to go through most of the WWE/F articles already and the following don't need roster cleanup: Wrestlemania (amiga), WWF Superstars (both versions: console and handheld), Betrayal, European Rampage Tour and With Authority. In-game arenas might need to go as well, they are basically level lists: which most game articles don't have. A summary of them could be in gameplay, as I see levels mentioned in that usually. "The game features PPV and television arenas based on WWE programming" or whatever, should work better. RobJ1981 (talk) 00:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
The editor has been blocked. I did some checking, all the edits by that IP were indeed false information. Add WrestleMania Challenge to the list of games that have fine rosters. I think I will look through the other wrestling games in Category:Professional wrestling games and see what else is left. The main issue appears to be the Smackdown games at this point. RobJ1981 (talk) 02:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
There is a discussion here about this here: Talk:WWE_SmackDown_vs._Raw_2008#Consensus_Time. It's the same user that was reverting me before. RobJ1981 (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

WWE TV

Do you watch WWE programs live? Do to circumstances I can't control, I will be without cable for awhile and thus won't be able to update what happens during their shows right away. This means I also won't know when an editor is adding BS (unless it's something obvious like vandalism). TJ Spyke 01:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

That would be great. Only things that would be noted here though (like PPV match announcments) since I intend to download the shows and watch them later and want to go in as fresh as possible. Actually, it might be faster if you just do it. TJ Spyke 01:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

NASCAR Fan24's Secret Page!

The Secret Page Detective Award
This user has found NASCAR Fan24's secret page! Congratulations!

NF24(radio me!) 02:55, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

WrestleMania 21

Would you be interested in joining me and LAX in expanding WrestleMania 21? Zenlax T C S 20:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome aboard. Do you think we should expand the MITB feud? Zenlax T C S 20:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
I have a question. Did Orton turn heel when he slapped The Undertaker? Cheers, LAX 01:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I just wanted to know because I plan on finishing the feud some time soon. Cheers, LAX 02:33, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

WrestleMania 23 Production

Superb. I really want to get that FA in the future, and I feel you've just made it get a step closer with the new paragraph! :) D.M.N. (talk) 21:10, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: User:Thebluesharpdude

Yeah, I dunno. He's young and enthusiastic but doesn't quite seem to "get it" as far as notability goes. I tried explaining it to him (see his talk page history) but I'm not sure that it sank in. Do they have forcible adoption here? Precious Roy (talk) 16:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Minor Barnstar
For fixing all of my minor mistakes on WrestleMania 21. Cheers, LAX 03:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
No problem, you deserve it. I'm actually quite surprised that you don't have more barnstars than what you. It seems like you work your ass off, and you don't get the rewards you deserve, but I'm sure everyone realizes your hard work. Cheers, LAX 19:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

ECW

Did you watch ECW? I know Shelton Benjamin is now in the RR, but was he just put in or was his match against Nunzio a RR qualifier? wwe.com doesn't say anything about it being a qualifier but I can't check myself until someone uploads it to YouTube (which is how I watched last weeks SmackDown and this weeks RAW). TJ Spyke 05:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Better Source

I found a better source for the 2008 Royal Rumble being the first PPV in HD. Here. It's the banner from here.--72.186.91.47 (talk) 19:37, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I found an article on WWE.com that's better, located http://www.wwe.com/inside/news/wwehdfaqs here]. Please add it. To me if it comes from WWE it's official.--72.186.91.47 (talk) 07:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

yeah

many people on wikipenia like OWENx, TJ spyke an probbably you have ran into me many times. I have heard of you before, I'l check my talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Altenhofen (talk • contribs) 09:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. I guess he's been a little more carful with this sockpuppet though since it has edits going back to September. You want to report it? I'm about to log off for the night (almost 5AM in my timezone). TJ Spyke 09:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Award

Hey 3bulletproof16!
Congratulations on finding the page that does not exist. Here is your reward; you've earned it.

The Hidden Link Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to 3bulletproof16 for finding the super secret hidden link on Selfworm's page!
Good job!

Congrats! selfwormTalk) 15:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Yo yo yo yo, pop a 40 and check your rollies; it's Hyb Tyme. Anyways, don't ask for details, but it is imperative that I be informed of anymore Hornetman socks personally. So, please inform me of any that appear. Cheers, SexySeaBass 03:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't want you offering him a deal; I'm giving him a second chance on the Pro Wrestling Wikia, but there is a time frame of a minimum of three months on it. If we are seriously going to consider giving him a second chance, then we should us that as an indicator. If you promise not to offer him a deal, I'll give you his email address. However, if I do you need to double-check anything he may say about me or the deal we arranged with me so I know he isn't lying to you. SexySeaBass 05:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I'll email you his email address now. Remember, double check everything he says about me or the deal with me. Cheers, SexySeaBass 05:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't think any less of you; I'm just glad that I don't have to try to stop you. With the experience both of us have, and the friends we both share that could have put some serious strain on the project. Hopefully this will die now. Cheers, SexySeaBass 00:43, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


Help needed with Colin Delaney‎

If you have time, can you help me keep an eye on it? Editors (mainly IPs) keep adding every loss he has had, and week-by-week events dispite the warning in the article and on talk. Perhaps a request for protection might be needed. RobJ1981 (talk) 06:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Royal Rumble

No. And the usuall source I use to update PPV articles (Wrestling Observer Newsletter) won't be updating until 8:45 EST (about 15 minutes from now) since today is Meltzer's sons birthday. TJ Spyke 01:30, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

I guess this is futher proof WWE doesn't care about the ECW Title. The ECW Champion (Chavo Guerrero) is in the Rumble match, the first time one of WWE's "world" champions has been in the match since 1991. Even though Chavo won't win, theoretically that he could win and challenge one of the other champs to become a dual-world champ. TJ Spyke 03:41, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Protection requested

Hey I seen you have been helping revert vandalism WMXXIV page. Just a heads up, I requested the page be protected. I figure with the Rumble ending and 'the road to Wrestlemania' heating up, this page will be a huge target for vandalism and unsourced junk. --EndlessDan 16:08, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Event

I think its time for us to contribute to the WrestleMania 21 Event. Zenlax T C S 20:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

NWA tag team championships

Here's my source for changing the article [14] Secretaria (talk) 17:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I've done the editings you've asked on the list of champions. Secretaria (talk) 14:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Smackdown vs Raw 2008

There is a new poll on the talk page concerning the prose/list issue. RobJ1981 (talk) 14:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
For finding the very needed image of the new HD logo of WWE Friday Night SmackDown!, I, TrUCo9311, award this barnstar to BulletProof, for his contributions. TrUCo9311 04:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
No problem, you deserve it. It was a very needed image. CONGRATS!--TrUCo9311 14:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Signature

Thank You. I would like it to say GuffasBorgz7. Bold and underlined. With every first letter in blue, and every second letter in black. Cheers. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 09:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

That is very good. How do I now set it so that when I type " ~ ~ ~ ~ " (without the spaces obviously) that it will come up with that colourful thing you made for me? GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 07:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for doing that mate. I really appreciate it. You're a good bloke. Lets just hope that when I save this, that it works! :) -GuffasBorgz7- 07:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hmm, I was just thinking, is it possible to have an animating one? -GuffasBorgz7- 07:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Bugger, thanks for spotting that. -GuffasBorgz7- 07:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: 8th Horseman...

I would be honored if you'd join. I feel you are an experienced member of WP:PW who would definitely help us with our expansion of pay-per-views. I'm going to ask the other members if they don't mind you joining. Cheers, LAX 10:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Congrats, you are now a member of The Kliq. Cheers, LAX 23:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey, please go check out the new discussion at The Kliq's page. iMatthew 2008 18:52, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above *member*. About a leader. you saw that one also? iMatthew 2008 18:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
It just to have somebody to keep the projects flowing well. Making sure everything gets done the way they are supposed to be done. Up until now, we have way to many projects, because some we started, and kept putting on hold. A leader in the group can make sure that they get done before any other projects are started. iMatthew 2008 19:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Wiki

If you ever feel like visiting, I have a video game wiki I occasionally work on (which I will try and attract visitors for a reason you are about to see): http://spyke.a.wiki-site.com/index.php/Main_Page Feel free to edit there. You know how I work, don't worry about using a free pic if there is a better fair use pic and other lax rules.

Unlike my wrestling wiki (which I haven't edited much lately), I have financial incentive. That brings me to this. Do you use Amazon? If you, would you mind using me as a referral ([15])? I joined Amazon's Associates program, which lets me set up a free store for a site (which I picked my Wiki). You will be ordering straight from Amazon (so I won't know anything about the people who order), but I will get a referral fee from Amazon. The website "TVshowsondvd.com" has a similar feature. I don't drastically need the money, but I my family could use it since I have mentioned possible money problems before (which is why we currently don't have cable since that is a luxury). If you know anybody else who uses Amazon, could you please ask them to use this referral site (including using it when someone asks about if a video game is out)? Thanks in advance if you do. TJ Spyke 11:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

SmackDown

I'm all for it, in fact I'd go as far as requesting a speedy deletion on the WWE SmackDown redirect to move the article quicker. The only problem is how do I cancel the current move request? -- Oakster  Talk  11:07, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Need a second opinion

Have you seen Bardock: The Father of Goku in Japanese audio w/ English subs? There's a thread going on here and some user claims that the whole Burdock power level thing is a hoax. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Appreciate the backup. I asked you a question at the discussion and was hoping you could answer. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Archival

Would you like me to archive your talk page?--TrUCo9311 04:03, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, No problem.--TrUCo9311 04:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Thankyou for the barnstar, I never really did get along with Mshake. Oh well, thanks I will keep that in mind.TrUCo9311 14:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Maybe I wouldn't have minded if he wasn't screwing up the article talk pages. Discussions older than 8 days? Come on! Mshake3 (talk) 16:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

New poll up at The Kliq's talk page iMatthew 2008 15:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Please go vote iMatthew 2008 22:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)