User talk:3bulletproof16/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Re:Hello!

lol, You didn't miss much. Somebody messed up the Broly page, though. Made a bunch of random redirects trying to move the page, then 3 people reverted it and the page ended up disapearing completley for a little while. Oh, and I'm pretty sure Deskana's getting pissed off with This guy.--KojiDude (Contributions) 18:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, welcome back. Nothing major for wrestling trolls, although some people formatting PPV pages the wrong way even after being told the correct way to do it (which could count as trolling). TJ Spyke 20:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Not yet, but my Spider-senses tell me he will, very soon.--KojiDude (Contributions) 00:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Wait a minute, no offense but, I thought Deskana was a female... Anyways, Takuthehedgehog was the one messing up the Broly article with a bunch of random redirects and I fixed it up a bit. And about that block incident, I was badly misinformed and shouldn't have stuck my nose in the person's business. By the way, I have apologized and won't do it again. --Power level (Dragon Ball) 15:58, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
I was male last time I checked... --Lord Deskana (swiftmend!) 01:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Barn star

The Original Barnstar
For your good contributions to Wikipedia, and just because I feel like you deserve one.--SUITWhat!? 42! 21:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Piper's Pit

Please check out WP:PW, there is an effort to make Piper's Pit its own article due to how importent it has been in wrestling. TJ Spyke 03:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

As I stated in the edit summary, the article was just a list of some random "Memorable" moments. If you believe Piper's Pit deserves its own article due to its importance in Wrestling then create an article for it that states why it is important to Wrestling. As it was, the article was just plain listcruft. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I feel you can't just simply revert it back without discussing it first. Major changes (like redirects) should be discussed first. Why not help make the article not be listcruft? Piper's Pit is a notable interview segment. If I remember right, there was some agreement that the article should exist (in a section on the PW project talk page). RobJ1981 07:54, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I've posted on the PW talk page and Roddy Piper's talk page about this. The interview segment is notable. The article should exist, Piper's Pit shouldn't just be a short note on Piper's page. It seems like it will be an article again, since (as of now at least) you are the only one calling it listcruft. RobJ1981 16:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

I need a little help here...

We're having an argument over at Talk:Rou Dai Kaioshin about the spelling of Majin Buu in the english manga. I said that they could either check volumes 24-26 of the DBZ manga or Majin Buu's page (under "manga name") to prove that I was right. TTN had changed "Boo" to "Majin Buu" on the article to avoid revert wars, but they still argue about the spelling on the talk page. Now they're demanding manga scans that prove that I'm right. Do you know how hard it is to find manga scans of a specific page on the internet? Hopefully, you and possibly someone other users, besides Suit and myself, can talk some sense into them. Thank you. // Sasuke-kun27 20:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm attempting to weigh in on the matter. Perhaps the fact that I have literally zero knowledge on the subject in question will give me some sort of objective view. --Lord Deskana (swiftmend!) 21:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I apologize for not responding sooner. I just signed on a couple minutes ago. I'll take a look at the matter as well. -- bulletproof 3:16 02:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
No rush. They seem to be a bit calmer than before. // Sasuke-kun27 02:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

eh... that was fast... -- bulletproof 3:16 02:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

I've seen faster... // Sasuke-kun27 02:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
...No I mean that was a fast response... -- bulletproof 3:16 02:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Oh, I know. Enough of these small comments for me, though. My signature takes up too much space and I don't want our talk page to become too crowded becuase of that or anything. I should shorten it soon... // Sasuke-kun27 02:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Not a prob. Glad everything cooled down on Kaioshin's talk page. -- bulletproof 3:16 02:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Power level (Dragon Ball) → User:Big foot123456789

Seems that the Power level guy is suspected of being a sock puppet of good ol' Big foot.--SUITWhat!? 42 04:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Hmm... interesting. WP:RCU should clear things up. It should also help determine whether or not User:Recoome is in fact User:Zarbon. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
See my talk page for the answer to this craziness. Power level (Dragon Ball) (talk · contribs)

Holy Crap

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
You have more than 10,000 edits and damn, it's still going up, you truly deserve this award. Regards, SUIT

--SUIT 18:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Woh... not even I knew I had more than 10,000 edits! -- bulletproof 3:16 18:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Here's a link--SUIT 18:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Wrestling titles

Would you mind posting your thoughts on the SS 2006 article and at WP:PW regarding listing titles in matches where they are not on the line? TJ Spyke 02:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Absolutely. I believe the listing of titles in non-title matches was discussed before in the WP:PW talk page. -- bulletproof 3:16 02:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

The Jackie Chan vandal

You want to report him, or should I? He's violated the 3 Revert Rule, and is still reverting, so some sort of action should be taken.--SUIT 04:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I think it would be best if you let me report him. He has already shot himself in the foot quite a few times so a block is inevitable.-- bulletproof 3:16 04:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Sure.--SUIT 04:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
I would advice that you also cease to revert. Trust me, I speak from experience. Even if you are just removing some troll's vandalism, you'll still end up getting blocked. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Pressing backspace is the same as reverting? Hmm... Oh well, I guess I'll stop that.--SUIT 04:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Can you please use more edit summaries when editing in the main namespace? It's hard to see what you're edits are doing. Thanks. --Deskana talk 16:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Whats so wrong about rvv? [1] [2] [3] [4] -- bulletproof 3:16 16:58, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Edit summary usage for 3bulletproof16: 29% for major edits and 11% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.
That's what I'm talking about. It's hard to see what you're doing sometimes. --Deskana talk 18:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I can tell you what's wrong with RVV and RV: Apparently it's better to type revert vandalism/nonsense/etc.. than rv or rvv since new editors won't know what it stands for, and other abbreviations etc. Well that's what I was told on my editor review.--SUIT 18:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
rv is fine (as far as Im concerned). Im talking about when you leave no summary at all. --Deskana talk 18:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

The Coola picture

I don't see what's wrong with the picture. I wrote on the page the exact adress of the page I got it from, and on that page it says that she doesn't care about copyright. You can go and see it yourself.--Chili 06:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

The problem with the picture is that she doesn't own the copyright. Copyright is owned by Toei Animation. This is why the image is a copyvio. -- bulletproof 3:16 06:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Should I talk to them and ask them if it's ok?--Chili 06:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


Trouble in paradise

We're having a little problem we're trying to resolve. Another move request over at Talk:Hercule (Dragon Ball), since apparently winning the last one didn't "count." Care to weigh in? Onikage725 07:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Survivor Series 2006

Alright, good point on the poster on the page - it's just every other PPV has the poster in that place rather than as a seperate window.

I know, but thats only done for seperate brand PPVs. PPVs such as Survivor Series, Royal Rumble, and SummerSlam have the logo in the infobox and the poster on the article. -- bulletproof 3:16 03:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

RAW

can you give me de RAW results , please KingOfDX 00:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Dragon Ball Lists

I agree, they aren't necessary, and the troll reverting thing, leaving some warnings on their talk page should work.--SUIT 03:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Andre the Giant

His role in Conan wasn't a cameo, a cameo relies on recognition of the persons fame, Andre was not recognisable and not even credited!Halbared 09:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Ummm ... Deskana, what's the deal here? Why're you signing yourself as Halbared when the edit history clearly shows you're Deskana? Oh, forget about it. I see what happened now :) Yuser31415@?#& 19:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

TRASH Belt = old ECW Belt

I'm not going to disagree with you on the "nn" count, that's ECW fans' call, but I don't know how to change your opinion on the "incorrect... Rhino" count except to invite you to TRASHionals in Maryland this April to see and touch the belt for yourself. The belt is pictured on the TRASH page; that picture is from TRASHionals 2 years ago. Wikipedia is verifiability; TRASH can verify their possession of the belt, Rhino cannot. Robert K S 23:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

ECW December To Dismember

Can you give me the results, Please. KingOfDX 01:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Dragon World

Please see Talk:Dragon World dispute for your vote on whether we should keep the Human (Dragon World) article or have it merged into Dragon World. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 15:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

My User Page

Why do you care about what I have on my user page? Who are you? Do you run Wikipedia or something? What I have on my page is non of your business.

If you can explain to me those questions and that statement, I will understand and we can all move foward. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RYANonWIKIPEDIA (talk • contribs) 23:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC).

Please do not include non-free images (images uploaded to Wikipedia without the permission of the copyright owner, or under licenses that do not permit commercial use) on your user page or on any subpage thereof (this is official policy and the usual wide user page latitude does not apply, see Wikipedia:Fair use criteria for details). Non-free images found on a user page (including user talk pages) may be removed (preferably by replacing it with a link to the image) from that page without warning (and, if not used in a Wikipedia article, deleted entirely). It is Wikipedia policy. Per Wikipedia:User page, you are not allowed to use these images on your user page. If you disagree with these official policies and guidelines, then you are free to discuss them here (Wikipedia talk:User page).-- bulletproof 3:16 23:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I see the rules. But why do YOU care about what I'm doing? Do YOU run Wikipedia or are you some stupid little member messing with people?

I'm not trying to cause problems but why should I listen to you when I don't even know who you are and I don't even know if you run Wikipedia or something. —the preceding comment is by RYANonWIKIPEDIA (talk • contribs) RYANonWIKIPEDIA: Please sign your posts!.

I'm an administrator, and I suggest you do what he says RYAN. He's perfectly in line with WP:FAIR. --Deskana talk 00:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

WrestleMania VII and Jake Roberts

It is true that Roberts refused to wrestle unless he was granted a release. He said so himself on the "Pick Your Poison" DVD that WWE released last year. TJ Spyke 02:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

VII?-- bulletproof 3:16 02:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
I meant VIII. TJ Spyke 06:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Dragon Ball redirects

To be honest, I pretty much agree with you. A DVD list is pointless, there's a video game template, and the current state of DB episode lists is confusing enough. Onikage725 13:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:JohncenaUnforgiven.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JohncenaUnforgiven.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Requested move Hercule (Dragon Ball) to Mister Satan

It's happening again. Place your vote/comment on the respective talk page for which name Wikipedia should use; a censored name, or an orignal name. Power level (Dragon Ball) 15:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Human(Dragon Ball) and Dragon World

Hello, my name is Sir james paul and I am here to resolve the dipute inbeetween Animedude360 and you. Both of you need to work on this fast so you can get this over with. I would like to ask both of you to be civil, and follow policies and guidlines at all times during this. What we will have to do is reach an agreement on the article talk pages. I would like the articles to be 2 while we are talking about this, if we agree to merge them, then we will, vise versa. If you have any questions regarding this you can talk to me here[5]. Have a nice week and god bless.--Sir james paul 02:01, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

  • I would like to tell you that I am here to help in resolving this mess and am not going to choose sides. Lets work to try to get this over with by December 24, okay. Also I would like to ask you to be oppened minded, we are not going to get anywhere if you guys are stubborn. Also make sure that you are talking to him.--Sir james paul 04:38, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • The best compromise for us is to merge it into a article called races(Dragon Ball). Voice your oppinion at my desk. Have a nice week and god bless.--Sir james paul 11:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Poll

You are invited to vote in a poll on Kiwi (Dragon Ball). -- Master 21:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

PL (DB) Comment

When you can, see Talk:Power level (Dragon Ball)#Okay, let's get these power levels right!, thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 19:20, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Go read this

Go to Broly: Second Coming talk page and see what this Jrapidfire has done if it is still on there. Heat P 22:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for doing that on Broly: Second Coming talk page. Don't know why I do that myself but mainly we left it because we where trying to get the Admin to banned him. But you way is just find. Just have to keep a close eye on the article.

Heat P 23:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
No prob... I was getting sick of hearing the same old crap from that troll. If he keeps this up, I'm sure Deskana will block him.-- bulletproof 3:16 23:46, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

The fanboy

I know you are busy but I have repoted User:Jrapidfire's conduct to WP:AN/I if you think or know of something that isn't there please add it, thanks for your time --Dark Dragon Flame 03:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey I seen he was. I was about to write a comment to him but you guy keep push me back then I seen HE got blocked. Must have been really commenting some major vandalism while I was gone huh? Heat P 20:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Hopefully he learns to be more civilized after this, see you around --Dark Dragon Flame 21:46, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

re: dbz

sure sign me up, although i'm not sure how much help i'll be lol, i'm pretty busy these days Plough | talk to me 04:27, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello

I was just wondering if you were the one that changed my edits to the Saiyan page.Kazekun 04:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Kazekun


Wiki Project

Yes.Darkwarriorblake 12:31, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

thanks for adding my message to User:Deathphoenix's talk page, I didn't even noticed that I added it on the wrong place, thanks --

Notaproblem-- bulletproof 3:16 22:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

I protected his talk page so he can't edit it. --Deathphoenix ʕ 23:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Dragon Ball Wikiproject

Yes, I would like that very much! Thanks, Bullet! Jienum 10:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Reverting my edits

Is there some reason you reverted my edits on Rogers Centre, Safeco Field, RCA Dome, Ford Field, etc? As I explain on Template talk:Sequence#Deprecate?, the biggest flaw in using this template in its current form is when a sequence of these templates are used in a row. Compare the formatting and layout of this sequence box addition versus this succession box addition. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

I did not revert your edits to Rogers Centre, Safeco Field, RCA Dome, or Ford Field. I simply removed the WrestleMania succession boxes from the merge you performed on the other sports related succession boxes in the artilces. Hope that clears it up -- bulletproof 3:16 03:38, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Royal Rumble 2007

I can't do it right now since I am editing on my Wii, could you put the Batista/Kennedy match back on top and fix the tag match (the Hardy Boyz link and listing Mercury first)? TJ Spyke 04:10, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Sure no prob -- bulletproof 3:16 04:11, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh, and changing "&" to "and". Thanks. TJ Spyke 04:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Someone put that stupid Undertaker winning his first rumble back in. I can't remove it without reverting another edit as well. TJ Spyke 06:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar :)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For quietly plugging away at the vandalism, lest your efforts and other contributions go unnoticed. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 02:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Thanks!

Of course. :) Couldn't let that sort of thing get past me. Luna Santin 03:02, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Little request

Since I can't do it without blanking the page (one of the drawbacks to editing with the Wii Browser is that you can't edit large sections, one of the reasons my editing has been limited until I get my computer fixed), can you change the userbox on my page from 15,000 to 20,000? Thanks in advance. TJ Spyke 02:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

notaprob.-- bulletproof 3:16 03:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Royal Rumble

I appreciate the concern, but if you'd check Wikipedia's own elimination records for every single Rumble you'd see that I'm right about Viscera and the record. It's verified by this very site. Please stop changing it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by ScreenwriterJeb (talk • contribs)

I would appreciate it if could provide a link to the records that you speak of. -- bulletproof 3:16 07:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

At the bottom of the Royal Rumble article page are individual links to articles on each individual Rumble. In each of those articles is a chart that breaks down the order of entry, the order of elimination, and who each person was eliminated by. I have gone through every single article. Viscera stands at the highest with nine. You're welcome to look for yourself. Unless you're suggesting that the information in those is wrong, but it seems to me they've been checked pretty well. What more verication do we need?—Preceding unsigned comment added by ScreenwriterJeb (talk • contribs)

Not at all. I just needed a source from which you obtained your information. Cheers!-- bulletproof 3:16 07:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you.  :-)—Preceding unsigned comment added by ScreenwriterJeb (talk • contribs)

Fair use rationale

Thanks for adding the fair use rationale to the DBZ logo I uploaded. Your contributions are much appreciated. Hucz 06:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

No prob.-- bulletproof 3:16 05:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Requesting someone with experience

In this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_Goku_%28Dragon_Ball%29 I saw someone labelled the name '孫悟空' as Japanese? But it is actually Chinese, the Japanese name is 'カカロット' and it is Kanji, could someone solve this problem and see if my edit is good enough? Because it is definitely Chinese as my language 'Korean' has Chinese/Korean = Hanji, so I know whats Chinese and whats Japanese aswell. ( Seong0980 03:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC) )

I think it’s all been taken care of here. -- bulletproof 3:16 05:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Reverting Son Goku

If you have a reason for reverting my changes on Son Goku (removing the 'Behind the child' and 'Behind the hero' sections) could you discuss them on the talk page? I've laid out my reasons why they don't belong, and as yet nobody has voiced there disagreement. Not that I don't think there is any legitimate counter arguements, but reverting without explination doesn't help. Deus Z 17:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Deleting half a page without an explination doesn't help either. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Actually it's more like two paragraphs than half the page, but I digress. I placed my explination in the talk page like I said, I assumed you would have seen it there before reverting. Anyways, are you actually in favor of keeping them? I'd like to know before making anymore edits. Deus Z 07:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

WWE PPV's (December to Dismember)

WWE seems to have NOW made it official:

http://www.wweaffiliates.com/ppv/calendar/ppv/ (e-mail princeofspace1@gmail.com, passoword raiders). 22:26, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Cool, thanks for the link. Its about time! -- bulletproof 3:16 22:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey

Thanks for signing my autograph book! Cheers, —mikedk9109SIGN 16:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Gokua

I got those pics off wikipedia isnt that ok? Dok5555555 22:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

You misinterpreted your own source. The site was talking about Trunks going super saiyan to defeat him. Please see [6]. Hope that clears it up. -- bulletproof 3:16 22:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

my bad, ur right i did interpert it wrong. Dok5555555 22:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

no prob. -- bulletproof 3:16 22:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment

Mphyire (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) - just forget his user talk page. Reverting his blanking isn't going to accomplish anything. Keep an eye on his future edits. Let me know if you need any help, Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 03:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

ECW/CZW Invasio

While the storyline did not progress it was a revival of ECW as it was stated to be an ECW invasion of CZW at their first appearance at Viking Hall, and was supposed to progress further but due to the actions of The Sandman and other factors it did not progress. This may have not been seen in the mass media as much or as long as the "Aliance"/"Invasion" in WWF/WWE but it is just as valid a revival, with Todd Gordon - the founder of ECW - and so many other important ECW wrestlers participating. If it is not recorded this period in the history of ECW will slide away into obscurity for not reason. Even Tommy Dreamer was part of CZW for a period of time before moving on to WWF/WWE. User:Der.Gray

The section is on the Revivals of the promotion. Though CZW used former ECW talent, It is not, in any way, shape, or form, a revival of ECW. Therefore, the CZW text is deemed rudundant. -- bulletproof 3:16 01:03, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

I know I did not include all the references that would have been desired to meet Wikipedia standards, but I was hoping those with further knowledge would fill in the gaps or I would be able to track down further information.

I do not understand why you removed the entire section regarding this, it may have been a one time event but it was not trivial in regards to ECW as Todd Gordon, The Sandman, and Rocco Rock were there. This is not meant as a flame, just an honest question so that we do not become involved in an edit/restore war as we are both fans of ECW and probably other similar interests. Thanks, User:Der.Gray

If it is something that occurred mainly in CZW, then I believe the text is better suited for the CZW article. -- bulletproof 3:16 01:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

PPV

If you had rad my edits (which I doubt you have, since you have the reverts are also messing up links), you would know I am not reverting. I was changing it to something that sounds better (SummerSlam 1997 took place on August 17, 1997 and emanated from the Continental Airlines Arena in East Rutherford, New Jersey). No one has objected to this. TJ Spyke 04:33, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

No one objected because you started reverting before you claimed it sounded better on the project talk page. It doesn't sound better. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Emanated is grammatically correct though, and it sounds better. So why revert it? TJ Spyke 04:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
It doesn't sound right though. Keep it simple. And like I said, do not blatantly revert just because you don't like other edits. Wait, talk it out, and see what happens. We were discussing it on the Project Talk Page, but you had to go ahead and revert anyways without a discussion first. Why do you think this happened? I've been on Wikipedia longer and already you have more consecutive 3RR blocks than I do. Remember talk things out first. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
I am willing to talk it out, that other guy shouldn't have gone throught and changed about 30 articles after talking to only 2 people and for less than a day. The articles should be back to how they were before he did it while it's still being discussed. Also, 2 of the 3RR blocks I got were from reverting vandalism (so I shouldn't have been blocked to begin with. IF there is a consensus (which I doubt will happen), then he can go back and change them. "Emanated from" sounds better than "at" though. TJ Spyke 04:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Listen, when someone says, "It took place... (on).... (at)...(in)..." what more do you need to say? If you say "It took place... (on)... AND EMMANATED FROM ... (in)..." it sounds like you are repeating the same thing. It’s like saying "Something took place here and here again". It just doesn't sound right. The other way is better because it’s simple and gets straight to the point. Remember that certain words are best used in the right situations. In this case "AND EMMANATED FROM" is completely unnecessary. For now, there is this you should worry about, [7]. Good luck with that. Cheers! -- bulletproof 3:16 05:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
It's that "at" doesn't sound natural to me. The real issue I have is that a huge number of articles were change with very little discussion. Also, I posted a response and the medition BAM requested. TJ Spyke 05:09, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

A new Dragon Ball attack list

I should let ya know too. Whenever you can, please see Talk:List of Dragon Ball special abilities#Garlic Gun. If you see that Garlic Gun there, that is just a sample of how the techniques should be classified and titled. I am going to change all of the techniques on the list (except Kamehameha, Dodonpa, Genki Dama, Kaio Ken and any others that were used as romaji names in the English manga/anime) into their literal English translation in about five days from now. This change will be similar as to how Bardock was changed to Burdock (name pun) and Hercule to Mr. Satan (which was his original Japanese/romaji name). Please comment on anything else if you have something you may want to add on to it. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 23:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

No prob. -- bulletproof 3:16 05:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

WrestleMania 22

The only reason I would consider putting it in is because a similar mention is made at the WrestleMania VI page (about DDP being the driver of Honky Tonk Man and Greg Valentine's car). Maybe if it was sourced? I think I could find a source for it if that matters. TJ Spyke 23:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, the only reason why I found the WMVI/X8 thing notable was because coincidentally Edge and DDP both returned to compete at a WrestleMania after making an appearance at one before. Not only that but I find it even more interesting that they would return to a WrestleMania in the same stadium they appeared in before. I think it should be added if CM Punk goes on to compete at 23. However, I’m not too sure if he actually was one of the gangsters that appeared at 22 so a source would be need. I'll look for one. -- bulletproof 3:16 23:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
It's not a big deal to me either way. Here are some sources though: [8], [9]. TJ Spyke 23:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

WWE Affiliates

I have checked WWE's affiliates website, and can't find any mention of the 2008 PPV schedule. Can you tell me where on their site it is? Lrrr IV 07:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC) Do you have MSN? I need to talk to you but you don't have e-mail enabled. Lrrr IV 11:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC) I explained it in the edit summerary, but I reverted the edit. Sites like Rajah and PWInsider often post rumors and act like they are real. None of the official sites (WWE's main site, the WWE Corporae website, or the WWE Affiliate website) make any mention of the 2008 PPV dates. Taking a look at your edit history, you seem to only add in things after WWE makes them official, so I don't know why you added in these unofficial dates. Lrrr IV 04:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I actually did find the dates posted on WWE Affiliates site around the same time the article was released by PWInsider. I usually do not accept any sort of information that has not been released by WWE officialy, however, in this case I actually did find the dates posted on the site. I don't know why they were taken down from the WWE Affiliates page though. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Maybe WWE decided to change them. If you remember, they also briefly had Armageddon in early November. I would treat those previous dates as unofficial now. Lrrr IV 04:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. WWE probably took them down after mistakenly releasing the dates.-- bulletproof 3:16 05:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Can you still log onto the page? I just tried (with the princeofspace account) and it now says the e-mail is not registered. Lrrr IV 06:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Bleach

Konban-wa, Bulletproof-san! I recently proposed a Bleach WikiProject at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals and thought that, although you're more of a Dragon Ball kind of guy than you are a Bleach kind of guy when it comes to articles on Wikipedia, you might be interested in voicing your opinions. A couple of the project's goals are listed on the proposal page and if the project passes the proposal, I will get started on an official to-do list. I'm willing to hear any and all criticism, comments, and ideas to help improve the project. Thank you for your time! // PoeticDecay 23:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Dragonball Wiki

  • Hi there. I noticed you're a member of Wikiproject Dragon Ball, and I'm trying to recruit some people from that to contribute to the Dragon Ball Wiki. It's in terrible shape right now with pretty much no consistency or policies, and only this week have I been able to get Angela and Sannse to create some Forums for us over there. I've got a proposed Manual of Style going over there and would like some people to contribute to that to set up some policies and start making the wiki bigger, better, and more intelligible/consistent. If you're interested, please hop on over or talk to me. Thanks for the time, whether you're interested or not. Wildyoda 02:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Report

Yet again, user Wrestlinglover420 has vandalised the Ultimate Spider-Man (story arcs) page, and seems unable to learn from mistakes; he's done the very thing that got him banned from editing that page in the first place, adding information about a forthcoming Storyline that has no verifcation or source. In previous times, he has vandalised my own page with abuse; he has a frequent history of doing so. I would suggest banning him from editing Wikipedia at all, as he seems unable to learn from mistakes. SaliereTheFish 11:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Cleanup on List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball

Since you requested the cleanup, I'm informing you I went ahead and did some major (really MAJOR) reworking of the list. I get the feeling it'll be reverted, but nonetheless went ahead with it. This wasn't on a whim, I actually thought it over on how to better the list. Just letting you know.--Nohansen 05:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Super Saiyan

A user continues adding Super Saiyan 5 to the list. Apparantly I've reverted three times already and I was wondering if you could help. Thanks--양복42 23:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Fixed your problem

Fixed it. See User talk:Deskana#WP:DBZ_page_moves. :-) --Deskana (Alright, on your feet soldier!) 01:00, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Deskana!-- bulletproof 3:16 01:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

WM X-Seven

This user upload a pic over yours that IMO looks worse. Do you still have the old pic saved on your computer? TJ Spyke 23:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Took care of it. -- bulletproof 3:16 00:39, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

WWE Smackdown! vs. RAW 2008

Regarding this tagging, I can't find any evidence of a previous AfD discussion, and there is no previous deletion in the logs. Could you elaborate? Thanks. Rockpocket 08:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Here you are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/WWE_SmackDown_vs._Raw_2008 -- bulletproof 3:16 19:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Excellent, thank you. I have speedy deleted the article. Rockpocket 20:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
No, thank you. -- bulletproof 3:16 20:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Multi-brand PPV's

It looks like all WWE PPV's will now feature all 3 brands (as announced on WWE's corporate website): [10]. TJ Spyke 23:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Olympics WikiProject membership update

The Olympics WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.

Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code #{{user|USERNAME}}, in order to renew or cancel your membership.

The Olympics WikiProject team

Obsessed with Wrestling

Until I can get it removed from the spam list, the only way to remove vandalism on pages that link to OWW is to edit the individual sections (so if the vandalism is in the results section, just edit the results section). If you try to edit the entire page, you have to remove the link (or at least remove the www. part). TJ Spyke 23:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

This is annoying, I have had to put the link back in on several PPV articles. Do not revert entire pages. Go back to the last unvandalized verson of the page, copy the correct section and then paste it in the current article. This way you revert the vandalism without removing the OWW link. TJ Spyke 23:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Recent edits to Hulk Hogan

It is getting tedious, isn't it! Gretnagod 23:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I know. -- bulletproof 3:16 00:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Another sock

You said: "Since I've noticed that you have been involved with socks on WP:PW, I just wanted to bring another sockpuppet user to your attention. User:Zenon2007 and User:Jet2006 have been editing Wrestlemania 25. It is suppose to be a redirect page mainly because nothing on the subject has been verified or even acknowledged anywhere and the only thing these socks have been adding is rumors and speculation such as..."It has also been rumored to be in Boston, Massachusetts." They have also been adding the page to 2009. The reason I believe they are both socks is because of the similarities in their user names and edits. Both have edited the same articles such as those that are soccer related and have reverted the redirect on Wrestlemania 25 to the same version as the other. It would really appreciated if you could protect the page and leave it as a redirect."

Done, protected the redirect for one month. You are right, likely sockpuppet and crystal-balling. --Yamla 21:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. -- bulletproof 3:16 22:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

WM 23

Help me here, I'm kinda frustrated with this dude that keeps adding the note on the page. Should i warn him? Killswitch Engage 17:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

If he persists then yeah do warn him. It seems he’s cooled down a bit though. I'll look into it. -- bulletproof 3:16 17:32, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for helping deal with that user who seems to have a vendetta against me. TJ Spyke 20:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

No prob man. Glad to help. -- bulletproof 3:16 20:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
I filed a sockpuppet report, if you think he has any other sockpuppets (or think you know who the true sockpuppet mast is), the report is here: Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/TJ_Spike. TJ Spyke 23:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Yea, I'll see what I can do. I can get in touch with Yamla and Chris Kreider if need be. I just got back from dinner so I should be able to keep an eye out. What are the names of the socks so far? I can go through the logs and see if they created any sleeper accounts through those socks. Bmg916Speak to Me 23:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
They've not. Unforunately for us they're smarter than that. They're all blocked now anyway. --Deskana (talk) 23:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
The damn socks wont stop! User:Rightman2's contribs -- bulletproof 3:16 10:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm, it's a distinct possibility. We'd have to run another check user though. Bmg916Speak to MeLeave Your Mark 12:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Personally, I think he should be blocked indefinitely for violations of WP:CIVIL and WP:SOCK, not to mention that video he keeps trying to add deliberately places Wikipedia in legal jeopardy because it's definitely a copyright violation as pertains to linking to copyrighted works (because the video is on a third party site) not to mention a violation of WP:EL. If a check user comes through that he's using socks for ban evasion, then he should be blocked indefinitely, period. Bmg916Speak to MeLeave Your Mark 12:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
This vandal won't stop: User:SUCKDXIT. TJ Spyke 22:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
I know I just reported him. Damn socks!!! -- bulletproof 3:16 22:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Nope: User:Debris420. TJ Spyke 21:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Somehow he is back: User:Unstoppable247. TJ Spyke 23:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
He got banned (of coarse) and all the edits were reverted back. TJ Spyke 04:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your tireless effort to help deal with those sockpuppets who have something against me. You will be an admin for sure someday TJ Spyke 22:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for signing my autograph book! Bmg916SpeakSign 00:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: WrestleMania venues template

No problem. Thanks for the props on the template. I had to add a "nowrap" back in to make it not wordwrap one of the arenas, but that does look a lot better than what I originally did. It was based on this template that I made for NCAA college bowl game stadiums. Anyways, thanks a lot for the positive feedback. -- FPAtl (holla, holla, holla) 00:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

2008 PPV's

I know we just use WWE, but an updated WrestleMania 23 promo my cable company sent has the dates for Royal Rumble 2008 and No Way Out 2008. I can take a picture if you want. I won't add it though unless you think we should. TJ Spyke 19:04, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

If its official then go with it. -- bulletproof 3:16 20:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Not the best pics: [11] [12]. TJ Spyke 20:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
I couldn't see a damn thing but still its cool. -- bulletproof 3:16 20:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, my camera sucks when it clomes to close-up pics. It has info on getting the WrestleMania III DVD for free for ordering Backlash, and has the 2007 PPV release dates and the release date for NYR/RR/NWO/WM 2008. TJ Spyke 20:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
No problem. Go ahead and add the info then. -- bulletproof 3:16 21:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Should I do Royal Rumble though? At this point, the only info that is confirmed is the date (January 27) and it's not the same as just making a new section. So for the next 6 months or so, the page would just be:
Royal Rumble 2008
Details
Promotion World Wrestling Entertainment
Brand (s) RAW
SmackDown!
ECW
Date January 27, 2007
Venue TBA
City TBA
Attendance 16,118
Pay-per-view chronology
New Year's Revolution 2008 Royal Rumble 2008 No Way Out 2008

Royal Rumble 2008 will be the twenty-first annual Royal Rumble professional wrestling pay-per-view event from World Wrestling Entertainment. It will take place on January 27, 2008. TJ Spyke 21:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Whats going to stop vandals from adding nonsense even if its left as a redirect anyways? -- bulletproof 3:16 21:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

WM 3

Thanks for the heads up. I'll keep an eye on it. -- The Hybrid 05:31, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

You got it. -- The Hybrid 22:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Could you please make up warnings when you revert him? I would like to get him blocked for all of these copyvios. The next one should be a final warning. You can use {{warning}} if you want. Peace, -- The Hybrid 02:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

I just finished opening a WP:SSP report, as he made one of his typical copyright violations with the account. Peace, -- The Hybrid 23:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem. I hate all of the copyright violations that take place on this site, and sockpuppets. -- The Hybrid 23:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Watchlist

I am getting the same problem. It was fine just a few minutes ago though. I wonder if anybody else is getting this problem. TJ Spyke 05:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

My problem is back. -- The Hybrid 23:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it's acting up for me again too. It showed that Fab was the last to edit WM23, then I saw you had made like 6 edits after. I am also seeing pages on my watchlist right after I edit them. It's pretty annoying. TJ Spyke 23:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Mine has about a 20 minute lag. One of your reverts at like 23:09 just showed up. -- The Hybrid 23:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm logging off. I don't feel like dealing with this. Later, -- The Hybrid 23:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, it is in there now (I added it with the sp edit), and my watchlist is working for the moment, but I wish that Jimbo and the Stewards would work on this. Peace, -- The Hybrid 04:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

A bit of help would be cool

Hey, bulletproof, how's it going? Well anyways, are you familiar with Ranma ½? A lot of the articles are in bad to terrible shape (bloated plot summaries, bad grammar, original research, & speculation; see Ranma Saotome) Could you perhaps help me out with this? --$UIT 03:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

The Undertaker

You sent me a message after I reverted one of your edits that more than puzzles me. In talking about you edit to The Undertaker article, it is you who in fact deleted valuable information that, while arguably original, does not need to be sourced, as it is within the article (I am operating under the assumption that my unsourced statement--which was not even mine, since it was simply a revert of your edit--was the "undefeated at Great American Bash 3-0). Further in that topic, the undefeated streak at GAB had it's own section under the Legacy subsection that lasted for a good period of time before it was seen as unneeded. The fact of the matter is that it is a true statement if only for the sake of the fact all 3 GAB matches are mentioned within the article itself. Secondly, related to this matter, is that you needed to appropriately tell me what information you were talking about that you posted on my talk page. I do not appreciate decoding automated messages about unsourced information on a multi-level revert of information I was policing without having added it myself.

Cain/Kane the Undertaker is, and has been under debate on the talk page and I would have been unopposed to changing it alone, and not in a article-wide edit where others could not revert it separately if they disagreed. The original discussion can be found here, as it gives information pointing to "Kane the Undertaker". If a conclusive source could be found and used, that would be wonderful. As it is, the debate can go either way.

The Great American Bash 2004 and Armageddon 2004 links (which were the reason for my revert almost entirely) were correct the first time. They pointed to the article containing the correct event. As you have insisted on otherwise, the links are currently incorrect and do not point to any article. Explain, as per your reversions reason, why the GAB links are "bad".

On a side note, the difference between current/reigning and "better" free use image are both matters of opinion between editors. I don't care one way or another, and I, personally, agree with you on the image. Nevertheless, it will always be one of those opinionated matters.

I hope none of this has been taken as an attack, it was not meant to be. After all, it is only information. But on another note, it is information. Sorry about the length, I tried to be to the point in the matter. Thank you for your time, please respond when you get a chance. --Enhanceddownloadbird 02:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

You mentioned fan cruft on your revert of my reversion. While I agree that the article has quite a bit, I failed to see any in the edit.

The "Cain/Kane the Undertaker" ref cannot be added until a source is presented that can verify what the correct name actually is per Wikipedia:Verifiability. The GAB links are still not correct as they lead to redirected pages and not directly to the actual article. The links were properly formatted before your edits, which was another reason why they were reverted. And last but not least, the trivia about Undertaker being undefeated at the GAB is certainly not as notable or as important as his undefeated streak at Mania. I removed it as a non-notable. I hope this cleared up any misunderstandings. If you have any further questions feel free to comment on my talk page. Cheers!-- bulletproof 3:16 03:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

WWE RAW

What is up with that IP? I showed him that the current logo is the one WWE uses, but he insists we use that other one (which has no copyright info and no source info). TJ Spyke 01:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I know, he has already broken 3RR. I have warned him about this. If he continues, I will report him. -- bulletproof 3:16 01:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
It could be the IP of the guy who uploaded the pic because now he is doing the same thing. TJ Spyke 01:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Edges Undefeated streak

It was pointed out that WWE counts non 1 on 1 matches diferently . WWE could very well hold that because Edge did not have a fair and resonable chance of winning the match due to being pulled out, they will say he remains unbeaten. TNA did the same with Samoa Joe. He lost a triple threat match, but because he wasn't pinned, they claimed he was still unbeaten. Killswitch Engage 06:03, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Survivor Series 2007

"It will also mark the tenth anniversary of the Montreal Screwjob. Survivor Series 2007 was originally scheduled to take place in Montreal, Quebec but was rescheduled for unknown reasons."

How is this not notable? mad_cat_42 06:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

It is not notable because all events are booked, re-booked, scheduled, and re-scheduled all the time. For this to happen to Survivor Series 2007 doesn't make it any different. The statement about it being originally booked in Montreal, Quebec is: 1) Unsourced and 2) redundant for the reasons above. Another thing is the 10th anniversary of the Screwjob. That is also not notable because: 1) WWE has yet to make any reference to this for the event and 2) The note isn't that important. -- bulletproof 3:16 06:59, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

protection time again

Hey BP3:16 I think we may have to ask the Admin boys to put protect back on Super Saiyan page again. At less from outside vandalism. Any thoughts on that? Heat P 18:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

WM III

Do you want to report him for 3RR or should I? I hid the comment (using <!--- --->, but he just removed those. TJ Spyke 22:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Theme Music

Can you explain to me why you are removing theme songs from wrestler articles? Everyone knows Triple H uses the Game by Moterhead and it adds to the article, so there's no referencing issues there. King of Kings is attributed to Triple H on Wreckless Intent. I don't want to start a problem, but I want to know why legit edits are being removed. Killswitch Engage 03:23, 18 April 2007 (UTC)]

Well for one, the info is not used in wrestler articles because the info is already found in Music in professional wrestling. And second, you also removed the referrence section of the article.-- bulletproof 3:16 03:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Oh, I'm sorry, i didnt realize that I removed the reference section. My bad. Killswitch Engage 03:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Edit to Son Gohan

Hey, I noticed that you removed this from the Gohan article:

It is never explained in DBGT why Gohan regained his golden hair trait when he powered up to Super Saiyan, being at the end of Dragon Ball Z, his hair stayed black when he transformed into a Super Saiyan.

Out of curiosity, what is the explanation for this? Thanks. Paul Haymon 04:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

The text that reads - It is never explained in DBGT why Gohan regained his golden hair trait when he powered up to Super Saiyan, being at the end of Dragon Ball Z, his hair stayed black when he transformed into a Super Saiyan - is OR because it incorrectly states that Gohan's hair remained black even as a Super Saiyan by the end of DBZ. There is no way to prove this because in the period of time between Super Buu transforming back into being Kid Buu and the end of DBZ, Gohan isn't seen transforming into a Super Saiyan. Therefore, the IP that inserted that text is assuming that by the end of Dragon Ball Z, Gohan's hair stayed black when he transformed into a Super Saiyan. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Ah, I see. Thanks for letting me know (and quickly, too!). God bless. Paul Haymon 04:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

RE:TJ Spyke

Any thinking person can see that you aren't TJ Spyke. Any allegations of such a connection are absurd. Hmm, TJ's gone. This is really quite shocking. I wonder if they'll repudiate the indefinite block. The Hybrid 10:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Moe Epsilon!?! He thought that you were socks!?! WTF is happening to Wikipedia!?! We are being overrun by copyright violators; we don't need the good users trying to kill each other off. The Hybrid 10:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Iv'e known you for quite awhile ( I was under another name), and I really think that this a waste of time for editors to accuse "SOCK" on somebody that would have absolutely no reason to make one! You and TJ are definately two different people and the usercheck is a waste of time. --User:Atomic Religione

Ki disscussion

Hey bulletproof I just wanted to notify you about a disscussion going on on the Wikiproject Dragon Ball page about the ki article. We just wanted to know everyones thoughts so let your voice be heard! DBZROCKS 01:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Images

show me how my images are copyrighted give me a url. UnDeRtAkErFaN01 01:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Files that are uploaded directly from cameras usually have Metadata info on their page [13]. Images that are taken from websites, however, do not have this info. (See Image:Stonecold.JPG *obviously not taken by you*, Image:Warrenbrothers.jpg, and Image:Jimmy_wayne.jpg)-- bulletproof 3:16 02:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I didn't upload them directly, I saved them to my computer to send some of them to my friend via e-mail and as looking through wikipedia I noticed they needed pics. the Bobby Pinson however I did upload diretcly. UnDeRtAkErFaN01 02:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Not this one-- bulletproof 3:16 02:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

That one I didn't take however it was on my camera. UnDeRtAkErFaN01 02:16, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Any explanation as to why I found the exact same image on a PWI magazine?-- bulletproof 3:16 02:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I Don't know how but for some reason the picture was on my camera and I thought it would help if I uploaded it. UnDeRtAkErFaN01 02:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

No worries, but it would certainly be appreciated if you would upload your photos directly from your camera next time instead of uploading them to another site first. -- bulletproof 3:16 02:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Next time I'll do that then. sorry if I made you mad or anything. UnDeRtAkErFaN01 02:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

It did nothing of the sort. Its just that we've recently been detecting an increased amount of copyright violations on images in articles with users claiming that their images were self-taken until it is discovered they were really copyrighted, not released into the public domain, and taken from another website. Wikipedia policy states that fair use (copyrighted) images should never be used if there is a free (un-copyrighted) image available. This is so that Wikipedia doesn't end up getting sued by the true owner of the images. Users who violate this policy end up getting blocked also. -- bulletproof 3:16 02:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

"World" Tag Team Titles

Could you help me clean up Category:World Champion professional wrestling tag teams? Someobody went and added teams that only won indy belts like the CZW Tag Titles and the PWG Tag Titles. TJ Spyke 08:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Thanks!

You're welcome. Have a great Saturday! --Ann Stouter 18:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

WWE Tag Team Championship

WWE.com lists dates of title changes according to the date it airs on their Title History page. Furthermore, their Power 25 for April 21, 2007 lists Londrick's reign as 334 days. I know Power 25 is trash and all in kayfabe, but you have to recognize the importance of explicitly listing the length of their title reign inspite of the questionable quality of the Power 25. (I don't know when you'll be able to check this out, so in case you don't check WWE.com until next week, I took a screenshot) WikiFew 22:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Although we don't add the title change until it airs in the US, when it does we list when the title change happened. SmackDown! was taped on April 17th so that is when the title change happened. Therefore Deuce 'N Domino have been Tag Team champions for 4 days now. -- bulletproof 3:16 20:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

So you're going to just outright ignore WWE saying "The title reign was 334 days, from 5-21-06 to 4-20-07" in multiple sources?WikiFew 00:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Again! SmackDown was taped on April 17th. The show is never aired live! Therefore the title change had already happened before the show aired in the U.S. Please see WP:PW-- bulletproof 3:16 00:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
And I will reiterate, I have an official citation from WWE that says they are basing the length of a title reign on when it aired, not when it was taped. With all due respect to Wikipedia, WWE knows more about what they consider their official title reign than a group of editors on Wikipedia. So what if historically Wikipedia has been edited based on when something was taped? When it comes to WWE title history and what they recognize, their word goes. WikiFew 01:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry man, but that’s just the way Wikipedia policy is. If you still disagree with it then I invite you to discuss this with other members of our WikiProject at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling-- bulletproof 3:16 01:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Wikifew, we go by when they actually win the title, not when it airs on TV. WWE doesn't admit that that SmackDown is taped. Sorry bulletproof, I wasn't able to help the last 2 days since my broadand connection decided to be all screwy. TJ Spyke 04:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

RE:WCW

Sure, but I'm only on for like 5 minutes a day now. When I'm on I'll watch it, though. Peace, The Hybrid 05:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

WWE Judgment Day

Would you mind taking a look at this page? User:Maestro25 keeps adding in that Khali use the chope in the 2006 event. He has already violated 3RR (and I can't revert back without violating it myself), so if he reverts again then there would be no reason not for him to be blocked. I tried to discuss the issue with him by telling him to discuss it with me on the talkpage, but he chose to just revert it again. TJ Spyke 23:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Sure. I'll take a look at the page. -- bulletproof 3:16 23:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Yamcha Vs. Yamucha

I was wondering if you good see this Yamcha Vs. Yamucha discussion and say what you think the article should remain titled. Thank you. ~I'm anonymous

I'll take a look at it. -- bulletproof 3:16 14:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for spotting the super saiyan 2 and the other stuff I missed when I was deleting what that IP vandal said on Future Trunks. DBZROCKS 00:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

No worries. -- bulletproof 3:16 00:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again

Thanks for reverting that IP on the Budokai 3 page! DBZROCKS 22:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

No prob. -- bulletproof 3:16 22:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Re:Another Doctor sock

I've got all his redirects speedily deleted. I'm wondering if there's anyway to get this guy blocked permanently? We already know the IP address involved and the guy's been doing this for almost two years now. It's getting annoying. -- Oakster  Talk   14:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the late response. I just got back from a week long Wiki-break. Yeah this guy is really annoying. There are ways to ban this troll indefinitely. We can file a report on Community sanction noticeboard and have him get a community ban or we could request that he have a Long term abuse page like the one our 'ol pal JB196 got at Wikipedia:Long term abuse/JB196. Lord Deskana and Yamla can help us do this properly. This troll is getting on my nerves. What is up with that obsession he has with WWE and some brand of dolls anyways? I had to put all Bratz related articles on my Watchlist just so I could hunt his socks down. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Another sock! User:Cholo1132 What is up with this guy?-- bulletproof 3:16 01:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I've had a look into a way around this. Considering only one IP is involved I think community ban is tad bit extreme. Plus it looks like reporting him to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets is going nowhere. Do you think a request for checkuser would work in this occasion? --Oakster 13:00, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
It would certainly help in this situation, yes.-- bulletproof 3:16 16:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Alright, I'll do it in a few minutes. While I'm here, I noticed the conversation on Adam1090 below and while I haven't watched this guy, I've noticed in his upload log something I've seen from another user over at Commons. Since I'm a little suspicious over there now, any chance you can tell me a bit this about guy? -- Oakster   18:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Trust me he's not Verdict. Adam was just some 14 year old kid who had a tough time with our policies. His edit history is much different than Verdict’s. I've been watching the situation over at Commons. -- bulletproof 3:16 18:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I know that he's not Verdict (clearly not enough Lesnar love). However, I'm more alarmed though over the upload summary from the Commons user I'm talking about. Compare this with this. "Better quality using HP Photosmart Premier" is what's making me suspicious. -- Oakster   18:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Very interesting. Most of the images the user on commons uploaded are the same images Adam edited on here. I can tell you another thing; those WrestleMania X-Seven images are not free. I saw them on a set/stage design site. Hmm lying about copyright status... Think you got him-- bulletproof 3:16 19:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I thought I've seen them before (in particular the one with Jericho/Regal on the stage), probabily from a PSD website or something like that. Well if it is really Adam, it does lead to a possible second sock Austin3:16 (whose images I have marked for deletion) and a Flickr account with some WWE.com copyvios. I think this is as far as I can go so far with this. Now before I forget I'm just going to report Krabs. Thanks for the help. -- Oakster  19:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
No problem really.-- bulletproof 3:16 05:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Hell ... The CheckUser has given the right result and shown right the IP address. Now all I need now is a way to get the IP address blocked. -- Oakster  Talk  09:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


Input request

Hi 3bulletproof16, there is some discussion currently going on here, and I noticed you have {{User anime}} on your userpage. If you are not too busy, I would appreciate it if you could drop some of your ideas on how to reform the portal on the aforementioned talk page. Thanks! « ANIMUM » 21:46, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

I'll take a look at it. -- bulletproof 3:16 21:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

The Coach

The coach may not be a GM but he is the person in charge of Raw!--Hornetman16 22:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)


Uhh no. The person currently in charge of RAW is Mr.McMahon. He became interim General Manager on December 12, 2005 when he fired Eric Bischoff. Coach is just his executive assistant. -- bulletproof 3:16 22:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
You're right until Mr. McMahon won the ECW Title and then he was moved to the ECW Superstar list!--Hornetman16 22:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
See Vince's bio on WWE.com Coach is just his executive assistant.-- bulletproof 3:16 22:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Vince Mcmhaon

I seriously suggest we protect this page. I cant keep up with the constant death edits. Killswitch Engage 03:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Dude, be careful, your running close to breaking the 3R rule. Killswitch Engage 03:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
WWE doesn't make it easy for us sometimes, do they? I have a feeling this will easily end up in the WrestleCrap Hall of Fame, right up there with the Road Warrior Hawk drunken stage dive and the Katie Vick necrophilia angle. Now the page has been fully protected and reverted to the version before RAW. Lrrr IV 03:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
At least Vince's page has been protected for a few days, hopefully the trolls and marks will calm down by then like they do with PPV articles. Lrrr IV 04:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't know about that one. It got so bad on the talk page that Metros had to extend the protection period to the 25th of June.-- bulletproof 3:16 04:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Maybe it's for the best. People have to realize that we can't go around adding things like death dates to people who are alive since that clearly violates WP:BLP. If Vince were to die in real life, WWE would be making a much bigger deal about it (or maybe less, if they weren't sure about him being dead). The fact that it went up within minuted of RAW ending should have made it clear it was fake. Lrrr IV 04:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Hopefully the trolls will calm down by then. However I wouldn't be surprised if Metros had to extend the page's protection period again. -- bulletproof 3:16

Reverts

Ah, okay, sorry about that. It looks like we will have to band together, and help get rid of these marks. Maybe someone should get a admin to lock the page? Kris 03:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Damn Marks-- bulletproof 3:16 03:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm willing to help any way needed. This is getting rediculous. Killswitch Engage 03:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
You know, I bet this is WWE's way at getting back at Wikipedia for being IWC central-- bulletproof 3:16 04:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
They are really going the whole 9 yards with this arn't they? WWE.com has a full page pic of the flaming limo with the headline screaming MCMAHON PRESUMED DEAD!!!. Wow. Killswitch Engage 03:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Good god...-- bulletproof 3:16 03:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Geez. Another crappy angle, and one that is causing headaches for un non-marks at WP. Lrrr IV 04:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Friggin' Marks... thats all I'm going to say.-- bulletproof 3:16 03:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm confused as to why Mark is such a vicious term to employ. I wish I could be a mark again. Then wrestling would be that much more enjoyable. Alas... I'm here to help with the Mark-defenses.Garistotle 13:25, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Lol, yeah, well, at least we locked the page. We showed them! I guess...Kris 17:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Actually, a mark can be someone who just really enjoys wrestling as well. These are usually called smarks though (smart marks). I agree that wrestling seemed a little more enjoyable when I didn't know about all the backstage stuff and thought it was real.

IP on Shane McMahon article

Don't worry. He is in violation of WP:BLP. If he continues to revert, he will be blocked. In the mean time I advice that you too stop reverting as this aggravates the situation. -- bulletproof 3:16 20:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

OK. Maybe the article needs to be locked!!!! Just saying!!!  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Right now that doesn't seem necessary since it is only one troll that is causing this chaos. BTW its "protected" not "locked". This isn't a board or a forum. Just saying. -- bulletproof 3:16 21:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
I agree with you!!!! But, there's been a lot of nonsense on his article!!!! But, hey, I'm not a PRO here!!!!  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
No one's a "PRO" here. Just a little bit more familiar with the policies and guidelines than others. Anyway, it seems as though the troll has finally calmed down. Good.-- bulletproof 3:16 21:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Then that's good news for US!!!! But, they will RETURN!!!!  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:13, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

You can get on my nerves!!!

Most of the CORRECT edits i do you undo. WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hornetman16 (talk • contribs)

Wohwohwohwohwohwoh hold on there. Most of the "correct" edits you do are reverted because they are not correct, plain and simple. Read Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Image use policy. Non-free (copyrighted) images, such as the Hall of Fame logo, are not to be used for decorative purposes. The overuse of copyrighted images is a direct violation of WP:FU and therefore has to be reverted. Please calm down and remember that these reversions are not being made to antagonize you in any way. This is just Wikipedia policy. It is your choice whether or not you wish to follow our policies. However, I wouldn't suggest not doing so while you're editing here. Thank you. -- bulletproof 3:16 21:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I didn't put that logo there for decorative purposes but ok. How come something is allowed next to the name of olympic gold medalist but not WWE Hall of famers huh?--Hornetman16 21:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Because the images next to those names are not copyrighted. They are free images and can be duplicated freely. I suggest you read through our image use policy before you make any more edits involving images. It is best for one to be familiar with our policies before contributing to the project. -- bulletproof 3:16 21:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
In the mean time WP:PW would appreciate it if you would remove your logo from the rest of the articles. I have to clean up WWE Intercontinental Championship so I am kind of busy to do it myself. Thanks.-- bulletproof 3:16 21:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Sure, BUT I don't want the picture deleted. so what do I do with it--Hornetman16 21:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I won't delete the image but I can't say an admin won't either since your image is made obsolete by Image:Wwehalloffame247.jpg.-- bulletproof 3:16 21:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Mine was uploaded after his but ok!Can't in be used for a userbox--Hornetman16 21:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
help from anyone you can get would be nice!--Hornetman16 21:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
The image cannot be used in a userbox because Wikipedia:Non-free content states that copyrighted images cannot be used in a User page. -- bulletproof 3:16 21:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Signature

Could you give me some help tomorrow with my Signature. I know it's look like I got it but I wanna make sure it follows the rules!--<span style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC">[[User:Hornetman16|<small>'''<span style="background:Green;color:White"> &nbsp;Hornetman16&nbsp;</span>'''</small></span>]] 03:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Woh... well then how do you want it to look?-- bulletproof 3:16 03:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

something like this-->User:Hornetman16/Sandbox#Customizing my signature!
Oh I see... Are you trying to make it look like it does in Template:Hornetman16Signature ?-- bulletproof 3:16 03:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Exactly.--<span style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC">[[User:Hornetman16|<small>'''<span style="background:Green;color:White"> &nbsp;Hornetman16&nbsp;</span>'''</small></span>]] 03:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Well first of all... signing your comments with {{Template:Hornetman16Signature}} instead of ~~~~ just isn't going to work. What you should do instead is go to "my preferences" at the top of the page (next to "my watchlist"). When you get there copy the following text that is in bold only:
<span style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC">[[User:Hornetman16|<small>'''<span style="background:Green;color:White">  Hornetman16 </span>'''</small>]]</span><span style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC">[[John 3:16|<small>'''<span style="background:DarkBlue;color:Gold">John 3:16</span>'''</small>]] </span> <span style="font-family:Eurostile">[[User talk:Hornetman16|<small>'''(let's talk)'''</small>]] </span>
Then paste it inside the field that reads Signature:. Once you've done that click on the box below it that reads Raw signature. Finally just click Save on the bottom of the page. Tell me if it works. Your signature should appear the way you want it to just by signing like this ~~~~.-- bulletproof 3:16 04:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I guess I can deal without the bible verse. Cause it caught it of (not enough room!!!)-- Hornetman16 04:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Yeah I was about to say it looked kinda long.-- bulletproof 3:16 04:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I wish u would have warned me!-- Hornetman16 04:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry. Anyway, I advice that you add {{db-author}} to Templates:Hornetman16Signature so that you don't get anymore messages like the one below. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
DONE!!! One question, do you like John Cena?-- Hornetman16 04:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I respect him. He works his ass off every day. Because of that he's one of the top draws in the company's history. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
u think his wwe title has been too long?-- Hornetman16 04:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I think the length of Cena's reign as WWE Champion shows how much the company has trust in him. Currently he sells the most merchandise, he represents the company well in other media, and has never screwed up or done something stupid like what Rob Van Dam did. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

FINALLY, SOMEBODY AGREES WITH ME!!!!!-- Hornetman16 05:01, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Woh woh woh... I didn't say I was a Cena fan... I do, however, respect him and his accomplishments. -- bulletproof 3:16 05:02, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I never said you were a fan, I said you agree with my point of views!-- Hornetman16 05:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Are you familiar with the ProWrestling Report show?-- bulletproof 3:16 05:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Nope. What is it?-- Hornetman16 05:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Its a show on the net. You might want to be interested in this episode [14] Once you click on the link don't click on anything else on the page and wait for the video to load. They're really intelligent people actually. Not like all the other cheap pro wrestling news shows you see on YouTube and such. Anyway you can check out their website at PWRshow.com. They put up weekly shows on their "TV Shows" section. Just something I thought you might be interested in. Tell me what you think. -- bulletproof 3:16 05:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
So... any thoughts?-- bulletproof 3:16 06:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Good show! Those against Cena were contradicting themselves. Seeya l8r, I'm sleepy!-- Hornetman16 06:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


You also might want to add {{db-author}} to Template:Hornetman16Signature BTW.-- bulletproof 3:16 18:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I thought I did that.-- Hornetman16 19:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
You actually made two template pages by accident. Templates:Hornetman16Signature was deleted but you also created Template:Hornetman16Signature. That one needs to be deleted as well.-- bulletproof 3:16 19:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Nope... that gif image is made from copyrighted material so no. -- bulletproof 3:16 19:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

How bout this one...and before you mention it I'm gonna read the Image policy in a minute. Template:JohnCena-- Hornetman16 19:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Any image made from television footage is also copyrighted. -- bulletproof 3:16 19:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Does that mean I can't use even if Vince himself gives me permission (although I doubt it)?-- Hornetman16 20:01, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Nope. Remember, no copyrighted images are allowed in user pages under any circumstances. -- bulletproof 3:16 20:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I thought I read on the policy that images copyrighted could be used on usrpages as long as they were free use.-- Hornetman16 20:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Free images could be used because they are not copyrighted. Copyrighted images can't.-- bulletproof 3:16 20:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Also please note that every image that you make containing copyrighted material, such as the spinning belt graphic, is still copyrighted and therefore you cannot credit yourself as the creator of the uploaded image. -- bulletproof 3:16 20:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)