3 inch Gun M5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
3 inch Gun M5 | |
---|---|
M5 on carriage M6 on display at Fort Sam Houston, Texas. |
|
Type | anti-tank gun |
Place of origin | USA |
Service history | |
In service | 1943- |
Used by | US Army |
Wars | WWII |
Production history | |
Produced | 1942-1944 |
Number built | 2,500 |
Specifications | |
Weight | combat: 2.21 t |
Length | 7.1 m |
Barrel length | bore: 50 calibers |
Width | 2.2 m |
Height | 1.62 |
|
|
Shell | 76.2x585R |
Caliber | 76.2 mm |
Breech | horizontal block |
Recoil | hydropneumatic |
Carriage | split trail |
Elevation | -5° to +30° |
Traverse | 45° |
Rate of fire | 12 rounds per minute |
Maximum range | 14.7 km |
3 inch Gun M5 was an anti-tank gun developed in the United States during World War II, using a barrel of the 3-inch anti-aircraft gun T9 and elements of the 105 mm Howitzer M2. The gun was issued exclusively to the US Army tank destroyer battalions starting in 1943. It saw combat in the Italian Campaign and in the Northwest Europe. From early 1945 the gun was gradually removed from frontline service. However, as of 2005, it was still used by the US Army for ceremonial purposes.
Contents |
[edit] Development and production history
Late in 1940 the US Ordnance Corps started a project to adapt the 3 inch anti-aircraft gun T9 to the anti-tank role. The barrel of the T9 was combined with breech, recoil system and carriage, all borrowed from the 105 mm howitzer M2.[1] The pilot of the weapon, named 3 inch Gun T10, was ready by September 1941. Although the subsequent testing revealed minor problems, it was clear that the gun, eventually standardized as M5 on carriage M1, presents major performance improvement over existing designs.[2]
Production began in December 1942. In November 1943 a slightly modified carriage was standardized as M6. In this carriage a flat shield borrowed from the 105 mm howitzer was replaced by a new sloped one. In January 1944 AGF requested to upgrade the guns built with the early carriage M1 to carriage M6; consequently most of the guns that reached the frontline had the M6 carriage.[3]
Production of М5, pcs.[4] | |||||||||||
Year | 1942 | 1943 | 1944 | Total | |||||||
Produced, pcs. | 250 | 1,250 | 1,000 | 2,500 |
[edit] Description
As stated above, the barrel was adapted from the 3 inch Gun T9; it had rifling with uniform right hand twist, with 28 grooves and one turn in 25 calibers. It was combined with breech, recoil system and carriage from the 105 mm Howitzer M2. The breech was of horizontal sliding type, manual; the recoil system hydropneumatic. The carriage was of split trail type, equipped with a single equilibrator spring beneath the breech and wheels with pneumatic tires.[5]
[edit] Service history
External images | |
---|---|
3 inch Gun M5 on Carriage M1 [1] |
Despite the performance advantages, it turned out that no branch of the US Army wanted the new gun. The Infantry considered it too large and heavy. The other possible user, the Tank Destroyer Center, preferred more mobile self-propelled weapons. Finally, a pressure from the head of Army Ground Forces, Gen. Lesley McNair, resulted in the gun being adopted by the TD Center. McNair's opinion was apparently influenced by the experience of the North African Campaign, where self-propelled guns were found to be hard to conceal.[6]
On 31 March 1943 AGF ordered to convert fifteen self-propelled tank destroyer battalions to a towed form; eventually AGF decided that half of TD battalions should be towed. A towed TD battalion included three companies, each with three four-gun platoons, in total 36 pieces.[7] M3 Halftracks were issued as prime movers. The organization from 1 September 1944 authorized M39 Armored Utility Vehicle instead, but these only reached frontline in spring 1945.[8] Typically, a tank destroyer battalion was attached to an infantry division.[9]
In October 1943 the first towed battalion - the 805th - arrived in Italy. Subsequently the M5 saw combat in the Italian Campaign and in the Northwest Europe.[10]One of the most notable engagements came during the German counterattack on Mortain in August 1944. The 823rd TD battalion, attached to the 30th Infantry Division, played a key role in the successful defence of Saint Barthelemy, destroying 14 tanks and a number of other vehicles, though at the price of losing 11 of its guns.[11]
In addition to the anti-tank role, the gun was often used to supplement divisional field artillery[12] The gun could keep up a steady accurate fire when used as a support weapon; a combat report from the 614th TD mentioned a two-gun section firing 143 shells at enemy post in about 40 minutes and achieving 139 hits.[13]
Although the M5 easily outperformed older anti-tank guns in the US service, it was large and heavy - making it hard to manhandle into position - and its anti-armor characteristics were found to be somewhat disappointing. In part that reputation reflected initial problems with fuses of APCBC/HE shells. It also must be noted that APDS round was never developed for the 3 inch gun;[5] a 3 inch APCR round existed (see ammunition table below), but it is not clear if it was ever issued to towed TD battalions.
As a result of the aforementioned shortcomings, commanders and troops generally preferred an alternative in form of self-propelled tank destroyers, which offered better mobility and protection.[14]
The greatest test of the TD battalions and their M5 guns came during the Battle of the Bulge. In this battle, towed tank destroyers fought much less successfully and suffered much higher losses than the self-propelled ones. A report from the aforementioned 823rd battalion said that "tank destroyer guns were one by one flanked by enemy tanks and personnel driven from guns by small arms and machine guns fire". Taking the recent combat experience into account, on 11 January 1945 the War Department confirmed a request to convert the towed TD battalions to the self-propelled form.[15] This decision meant gradual removal of the M5 from frontline service, a process that continued until the end of the war in Europe.
As of 2005, the M5 was still used by the US Army for ceremonial purposes.
[edit] Ammunition
The M5 utilized fixed ammunition, with the same 76.2x585R cartridge case - designated 3-inch Cartridge Case Mk IIM2 - as other descendants of the 3-inch M1918 anti-aircraft gun.
Available ammunition[16][17] | |||||
Type | Model | Weight, kg (round/projectile) | Filler | Muzzle velocity, m/s | |
AP-T | AP M79 Shot | 12.05 / 6.8 | - | 792 | |
APCBC/HE-T | APC M62 Projectile | 12.36 / 7 | 792 | ||
APCR-T | HVAP M93 Shot | 9.42 / 4.26 | - | 1,036 | |
HE | HE M42A1 Shell | 11. 3 / 5.84 | TNT, 390 g | 853 | |
Smoke | Smoke M88 Shell | 6.99 / 3.35 | Zinc chloride (HC) | 274 | |
Target practice | TP M85 Shot | ||||
Practice | Practice M42B2 Shell |
Armor penetration table[16] | ||||
Ammunition \ Distance, m | 457 | 914 | 1,371 | 1,828 |
AP M79 Shot (meet angle 30°, homogeneous armor) | 109 | 92 | 76 | 64 |
APC M62 Projectile (meet angle 30°, homogeneous armor) | 93 | 88 | 82 | 75 |
HVAP M93 Shot (meet angle 30°, homogeneous armor) | 157 | 135 | 116 | 98 |
Different methods of armor penetration measurement were used in different countries / periods. Therefore, direct comparison is often impossible. |
[edit] Notes
- ^ Hogg - Allied Artillery of World War Two, p 152; Zaloga - US Anti-tank Artillery 1941-45, p 17.
- ^ Zaloga - US Anti-tank Artillery 1941-45, p 17.
- ^ Zaloga - US Anti-tank Artillery 1941-45, p 17, 18.
- ^ Zaloga - US Anti-tank Artillery 1941-45, p 21.
- ^ a b Hogg - Allied Artillery of World War Two, p 152-155.
- ^ Gabel - Seek, Strike and Destroy - US Army Tank Destroyer Doctrine in World War II, p 46-47; Zaloga - US Anti-tank Artillery 1941-45, p 17.
- ^ Gabel - Seek, Strike and Destroy - US Army Tank Destroyer Doctrine in World War II, p 47.
- ^ Zaloga - US Anti-tank Artillery 1941-45, p 20-21.
- ^ Gabel - Seek, Strike and Destroy - US Army Tank Destroyer Doctrine in World War II, p 51, 56.
- ^ Zaloga - US Anti-tank Artillery 1941-45, p 22-23, 33-34.
- ^ Denny - The Evolution and Demise of U.S. Tank Destroyer Doctrine in the Second World War, p 50-54.
- ^ Zaloga - US Anti-tank Artillery 1941-45, p 34.
- ^ Lee - The Employment of Negro Troops, Chapter XXI: Artillery And Armored Units In The ETO.
- ^ Gabel - Seek, Strike and Destroy - US Army Tank Destroyer Doctrine in World War II, p 63; Zaloga - US Anti-tank Artillery 1941-45, p 22-23, 33-34.
- ^ Denny - The Evolution and Demise of U.S. Tank Destroyer Doctrine in the Second World War, p 57-61.
- ^ a b Hunnicutt, R. P. - Stuart: A History of the American Light Tank, p 501.
- ^ Technical Manual TM 9-2005 volume 3, Infantry and Cavalry Accompanying Weapons, p 49.
[edit] References
- Denny, Bryan E. (2003). The Evolution and Demise of U.S. Tank Destroyer Doctrine in the Second World War. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. PDF copy
- Gabel, Christopher R. (1985). Seek, Strike and Destroy - US Army Tank Destroyer Doctrine in World War II, Leavenworth papers no. 12. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. PDF copy
- Hogg, Ian V. (1998). Allied Artillery of World War Two. Crowood Press, Ramsbury. ISBN 1-86126-165-9.
- Hunnicutt, R. P. (1992). Stuart: A History of the American Light Tank. Presidio Press. ISBN 0-89141-462-2.
- Lee, Ulisses (1966). The Employment of Negro Troops. US Army Center of Military History. Web link
- Zaloga, Steven J. (2005). US Anti-tank Artillery 1941-45, illustrated by Brian Delf, New Vanguard 107, Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-84176-690-9.
- Technical Manual TM 9-2005 volume 3, Infantry and Cavalry Accompanying Weapons, War Department, 1942.
[edit] External links
|