User talk:38.117.232.33

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Benjamin Zev Koblentz. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. tmopkisn tlka 20:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Benjamin Zev Koblentz

Your recent edit to Benjamin Zev Koblentz (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — FireFox (talk) 15:23, 03 August '06

[edit] 2006 Rose Bowl

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 2006 Rose Bowl. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --JFreeman (talk) 21:11, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Continuing vandalism to 2006 Rose Bowl

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to 2006 Rose Bowl, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --JFreeman (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Tim Tebow

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Tim Tebow , you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --St.daniel 21:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

No, you are blocked. If, when the block expires, you continue with this childish vandalism, the blcoks will get longer. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Karol Sheinin

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Karol Sheinin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RJASE1 Talk 18:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Chicago Manual of Style. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:36, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Indulgence has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sam Korn (smoddy) 19:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Tye Tribbett has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:22, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Edward J. Normand has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Crazy Boris with a RED beard 20:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC)