User talk:.:Debil:.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Warnings

Alright, I apologize for that. However, you have no right to put incessant warnings on my page. Now leave it be, or I will call a moderator!

I will not replace the warnings because I'm tired of fighting with you, but be warned that such behavior is not tolerated. You are not in the right here. Calling an "admin" (not moderator, this isn't a forum) will not help you, as you are the one acting against the rules. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 07:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

The personal attacks are also unacceptable. I've been civil with you thus far. I'd suggest you rethink how you comment on situations. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 07:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Good. I could go into replacing MY warnings on your talk page because you went off and deleted them, but I'd like this whole thing to be over. I honestly detest you, and your stubborness to the point of arrogance, but I'm not going to do anything else and I'd just like you to leave me alone. I'd like you to be warned that your behavior in this matter will not be tolerated either. .:Debil:. 07:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Your warnings were inappropriate, because I performed no act that warrented them. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 07:17, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Is deleting everything I put up on wikipedia civil? You are hardly an easy person to deal with, and have no problems getting into edit wars with multiple people. .:Debil:. 07:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

It's the other way around. You edit warred with three different editors at once your first time around. I have no problem with the majority of editors. It's a select few which draw my attention. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 07:17, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I don't get you. What's your deal? You seem terminally arrogant, deathly stubborn, and have no respect for anything anybody else writes. You also hide behind Wikipedia's menagerie of rules and regulations, instead of just talking one on one with people that offend or irritate you. If you had just said "Hey, that was pretty uncool what you did to my page" I would have apologized on the spot. But instead you decided to vandalise my page with three paragraphs of warnings and then warn me, having no authority, that I was going to get banned for taking down that vandalism. .:Debil:. 07:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

It's not vandalism to report others for vandalism. Understand that. I don't get how you can remain ignorant of Wiki policy. it was made clear to you that removing such warnings was vandalism, yet you continued. You seem ignorant even now, yet you've been told why it is so. You still use personal attacks and make vast generalizations, yet you know these are wrong, too. Let me make this clear. I would not mind your edits if you did them well. If you make stupid "my ass" comments in summaries, you're bound to get reverted. Thus far, you have not made very helpful edits to Naruto articles (elsewhere I do not comment on). Another editor liked your Jiraiya addition, so I rewrote that. Understand that if you simply become thorough i wouldn't be a problem. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 07:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

The Jiraiya section did NOT need a rewrite! I covered all major points to their relationship, and all points were presented with correct grammar and spelling. You introduced broken paragraphs and ideas, spelling errors and gramatical inaccuracies to the article that I spent 45 minutes writing up! It's clear you did that to have YOUR way with things and to try to prove a point. This is unacceptable, I only revert or change your edits when absolutely nececcary, and I take mutch time to consider the points you make and the way you present the information. Please stop being so stubborn and arrogant. .:Debil:. 07:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Stop removing all the warnings. ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk | Contribs) 16:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Inverted, you have no place in this, now go away. This is not your issue, the issue is dropped, and you are the one putting incessant warnings and crap on MY talk page now. You have no right, Go away. .:Debil:. 20:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Every editor has a place everywhere. He has the right to enforce the warnings on the page if he wishes. Also, stop cold reverting pages. You're removing other content besides mine. You can go into the history and retrieve your text if you wish, but don't undo hours worth of changes to preserve yours. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 20:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Aye, I'll just get my text. I disagree, however. This is MY page on wikipedia, you have no right to mess it up, just like how I have no right to mess with yours. .:Debil:. 20:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

On the contrary, this is not only your page. Nor is mine only my own. Your are allowed leeway with this page, since it is under your name, but it is still licensed under the GDFL, and any editor has the right to edit it. In particular, the removal of warnings is something anyone can correct should they feel like it. Lastly, if you're going to keep readding your text, clean it up. I recognized and fixed the errors I made. Yours still has several, particularly in capitalization. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 21:02, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I am Content with the text, I actually like it. It adds in some new information and flows quite nicely without ousting my paragraphs. Glad we could reach a compromize. .:Debil:. 21:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

If you want to hide the warnings so much, archive them. ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk | Contribs) 06:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Fuck off. And stop messing with my page, the orphaned fair use part is not needed anymore, as the image was deleted. Stop being an asshole. .:Debil:. 07:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm not being an asshole, and don't tell me to fuck off.

Anyway, maybe you should have a look at WP:DWV. Quote:

Deleting the comments of other users from article Talk pages ... The above does not apply to the user's own Talk page, where users generally are permitted to remove and archive comments at their discretion, except in cases of legitimate warnings, which they are generally prohibited from removing, especially where the intention of the removal is to mislead other editors.

The warnings are completely legitamate and should not be removed. ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk | Contribs) 15:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

You have no part in this. The dispute is OVER, the warning has been recieved, and you are just being an asswipe now. And you are now vandalising my page by putting that image notice back up repeatedly. Kindly FUCK OFF, because I'll have to add warnings to your page if you don't stop vandalising mine. .:Debil:. 21:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

You also have no right to remove things I have said to make your point. enough of this now. Stop.

Reported to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:.:Debil:.. Hopefully this will be the end of this. ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk | Contribs) 09:45, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

You are such an asshole, inverted.

[edit] We share the same idea

What can I say, I'm very impressed by your opposition against that stupidly conservative Someguy... because most of everybody here seems to be afraid of him, except you. Interesting enough, I have the same idea with you and totally agree with you. Someguy... always thinks that he's true, he's the best, he's never wrong and looks down on every editing of new members. He never respects others' ideas and just makes everything in his own way. Me and my friends have recently joined Wiki community and all our contributions related to Naruto have been brutally deleted by him, he reverted every line, every word. I never see what a vacuous person before. I don't know how able he is, how much knowledge he possesses but his malpractice is unbearable. Causesobad 14:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

I get your advice but "the first one to call people who have authority to stop the arguement" or "what he's doing isn't okay" are somthing out of my ability. If I could do that, I would have done for a long time ago. I'm just a newcomer here while he's a canniness full of experience and acquaintanceship and he considers my ideas not as a rag. He is an experienced editor, doesn't mean that an always-true appraiser. Maybe you have read my arguement with him about Kakuzu thing. In fact, for me Kakuzu is regarded as a "greedy" or "having a strong desire for money" is not important. The important thing is I must struggle and protect my idea. The more we appease him, the more arrogant he is and the more confident he thinks of his never-wrong opinion. Since the appearance him, "Naruto" section is just like an inaccessible mecca where all the enter-permission must go through the annoying "firewall" Someguy... My friend advises me that the best way is to avoid him as far as possible and edit the other things instead of wasting time argueing with that vacuous guy. I hope that you'll support me if you want. Causesobad 14:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)