Talk:.280 British

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Firearms; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page where you can find a list of open tasks. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (general topics): Military technology and engineering task force Weaponry task force

[edit] Inconsistent Statistic

I think there is an inconsistency in the rated energy statistic in the ballistic performance section of the right panel. 19880 ft-lbs/27037 J is WAY to high. It might be increased by a factor of 10 over the real value. I don't have any official source with energy figures, so I don't want to change it. 71.207.227.18 03:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Nice catch, I must have stuttered when I typed it. It's fixed now. Thanks. Arthurrh 04:26, 8 August 2007 (UTC)