Image:2nd Lancet Iraqi death count Figure 4.gif

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

• Image
• File history
• File links

No higher resolution available.
2nd_Lancet_Iraqi_death_count_Figure_4.gif‎ (657 × 441 pixels, file size: 14 KB, MIME type: image/gif)

Figure 4 from Gilbert Burnham, Riyadh Lafta, Shannon Doocy, and Les Roberts (2006) "Mortality after the 2003 invasion of Iraq: a cross-sectional cluster sample survey" The Lancet (published online October 11, 2006) DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69491-9

Copyright: (c) 2006, The Lancet

Fair use rationale: used to illustrate the journal article from which it is taken (the "object in question") in its Wikipedia article, Lancet surveys of mortality before and after the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

This work is copyrighted and unlicensed. It does not fall into one of the blanket acceptable non-free content categories listed at Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images or Wikipedia:Non-free content#Audio clips. However, it is believed that the use of this work in the article "Lancet surveys of mortality before and after the 2003 invasion of Iraq" : To illustrate the subject in question Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information On the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation ([1]), qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Copyrights. To the uploader: this tag is not a sufficient claim of fair use. You must also include the source of the work, all available copyright information, and a detailed non-free use rationale.

[edit] Graph explanation

Figure 4 from the October 2006 Lancet survey of Iraq War mortality, showing a comparison of 3 mortality estimates. Two letters subsequently published in the Lancet journal discuss this graph [2] [3], and the authors of the study replied [4]. The authors wrote: "Josh Dougherty and Debarati Guha-Sapir and colleagues all point out that figure 4 of our report mixes rates and counts, creating a confusing image. We find this criticism valid and accept this as an error on our part. Moreover, Dougherty rightly points out that the data in the US Department of Defense source were casualties, not deaths alone."

The 2006 Lancet study household survey estimate uses the mortality rate scale to the right. The Iraq Body Count project and the Department of Defense (DoD) estimate use the total-deaths scale to the left.

The purpose of the graph according to the Lancet article is to show that these 3 mortality estimates all indicate an increasing rate of deaths over time. The increasing rate is shown by the increasing steepness in the slopes of all 3 graph lines.

DoD estimates are from here:

• http://www.defenselink.mil/home/features/Iraq_Reports/Index.html

The last DoD report before the October 2006 Lancet study came out was the August 2006 DoD report. [5]

The 3 studies come up with different casualty and death totals due to differing methodologies for estimating deaths.

For more info, and for explanations of various mortality methodologies and their wide variation in estimates of deaths, see Casualties of the conflict in Iraq since 2003.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

• Search for duplicate files
• Edit this file using an external application

  See the setup instructions for more information.

File links