Talk:2 Become 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2 Become 1 article.
Article policies
Good article 2 Become 1 has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.

Should an article like this rather be included within a subsection of the band's page and then have the title redirect to the band's page?--Fuzzball! 00:13, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

That was done ages ago. DrippingInk 16:28, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:2become1-uscd2.jpg

Image:2become1-uscd2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA pass

  • Some refs are reused heavily in the "Chart performance" section - you could trim down on the reuse and just have the ref at the end of the paragraph
  • "Sometimes the closing scene would not be shown on television due to the song fading out to an instrumental which lasts for forty seconds." - Ref, and it's a standalone sentence, move to a paragraph
  • Avoid wikilinking individual years.

If you have an issue with this review, you can request a reassessment. If you are happy with it, please consider reviewing another GA candidate. Cheers, Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 09:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 09:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)