User talk:24.61.21.244

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia if you're new. I reverted your edits on anarchy because they were a) Original research and b) Uncited. Wikipedia establishes its articles based on secondary sources, and isn't suppposed to be doing the work as far as saying which sources are correct and false. If what your edits said were somewhere said by a famous anarchist or other individual, feel free to add that, as per policy. Thank you, --Urthogie 18:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Caillou

While it's very clear (and much appreciated) that you tried to find sources for your points on Caillou, unfortunately those sources are not verifiable. The tv.com reviews are written by site users, as is the Associated Content link (written, apparently, by a user named "Superdork") and thus, neither of the sources you site are verifiable. Regretfully, because you obviously tried, I've reverted the information you added. Sorry....if you can find verifiable, independently-published major sources saying the same thing, by all means feel free to re-add.Gladys J Cortez 16:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)