User talk:24.45.47.102

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Mail-order bride. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. Tangotango 14:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Hey, just a note; when removing sections from an article, make sure to always use an edit summary. Thanks. ~ PseudoSudo 15:00, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello; I did enter some information on the discussion page; I will read on how to do an edit summary; How do you send messages??? Michaellovesnyc michaellovesnyc

Sorry I hit the wrong tab there, and you fixed it back faster than I. --Alf melmac 13:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Richard Nixon. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Randy Johnston 06:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your to Rudy Giuliani

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

--FrankCostanza 03:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Mail-order bride, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Cometstyles 17:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Screw you; who are you piece of filth to threaten me; stop lying about me and President-elect Giuliani michaellovesnyc

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Personal weapon has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gary King (talk) 20:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)