User talk:24.44.45.54

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Your edits to Woodbridge, Connecticut

Your edit summary states "reverted from vandalism" but it seems as if you only removed statistical data which is referenced. Please be more careful about which instances of vandalism you revert, please.

~Kylu (u|t) 03:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 24.44.45.54). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type {{helpme}} on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have.

Please note these points:

  • Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
  • Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
  • If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
  • Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Both adding such unreasonable information and editing articles maliciously are considered vandalism.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia.

Anyway, it's not the correcting of the page that I reverted in that case, it's the removal of US Census data. If you can correct this all at once so it looks good, that's fine, but when you remove factual data from a page and simply put "reverted from vandalism" it looks awfully suspicious. Please don't take it personally. :)
As far as not having a username, if you are going to contribute on a regular basis, I'd really encourage you to register! You might not know it, but actually having your IP attached to your edits is more a privacy invasion than whatever username you might come up with. There are many frequent contributors that I am aware of, but only one who regularly fights vandalism and is an IP (You might find his user talk page kinda interesting, actually.)
Lastly, thank you for replying to my message. If there is anything else I can help you with, please feel free to ask!
~Kylu (u|t) 04:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Smith Act on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. Newton2 19:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lieberman

Might as well revert all the way back: I was trying to keep up with the POV as it was being inserted, but decided to wait for it to finish. You can revert over all of my edits, as I was just trying to keep up with the POV inserts; and the Table of Contents was destroyed with that whole series of edits. Sandy 01:27, 29 July 2006 (UTC)