User talk:24.39.123.238

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily semi-protected from editing to prevent disruptive actions.

 Editing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled to prevent 24.39.123.238 (talk • contribs • block logauto) and other new users from making disruptive edits.
See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 24.39.123.238). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in.

When you edit pages:

  • Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
  • Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
  • If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
  • Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on my talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. Antonrojo 03:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Antonrojo 03:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

Yoshiaki Omura

The statements you have asserted with the Shinnick citation are not supported by the source. Please read the discussion pertaining to that. Even Richard agreed that the source didn't actually say that.

Also, please explain who you are and how you're familiar with the discussion, and why you suddenly appeared to have such interest in this article. - Che Nuevara 23:35, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

He did.
WP respects anonymity. For reasons. Who are you The Grand Inquisitor of Wikipedia?
I'm nobody in particular, and I don't claim to be. But there have been several borderline abuses on that article, and your sudden appearance as an anonymous IP might get you into trouble that you don't necessarily deserve due to the trigger-finger attitude at the article. I didn't mean to ask anything about you as a real-world person, but rather about you as a Wikipedia editor, and possible relations to other editors. Wikipedia does indeed value privacy, but you may be subject to accusations of deception at an article like Omura's. It's clear to me that you're familiar with the discussion, even though your comments in your edit summaries are misrepresentative of it, and anyone is bound to wonder why. - Che Nuevara 23:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
You are attempting intimidation. Any of a number of people have interest in this entry. Anonymity is appropriate. If you feel otherwise, feel free to provide your phone number. 24.39.123.238 00:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm not attempting intimidation, and I don't want your phone number. All I want to know is a) if you have ever edited Wikipedia under a unique name, and b) if you were asked by someone to approach this article. Neither one of those answered either way will condemn you, but I feel it's appropriate to be transparent. My answers are a) no, and b) I was asked to step in as a mediator.
I'm trying to collect all relevant information on this article and its contributors. I am in no way trying to convince you not to edit the article. - Che Nuevara 00:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

The Bi-Digital O-Ring Test is a widely known and respected tool. Conventional medicine is hostile to this tool. I will not be intimidated. I will maintain my anonymity. I will not discuss this further. 24.39.123.238 00:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry that you feel that way, and I won't pursue the issue further. But I assure you that intimidation is not my intent; I have no interest in BDORT one way or the other. All I care about is responsible use of sources, so please keep that in mind when you add information. - Che Nuevara 00:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Omura and Arbitration

A request for arbitration has been filed for Yoshiaki Omura. Please see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Current requests. - Che Nuevara 22:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Legal threats

Your recent edits could give other users the impression that you may consider legal or other 'off-wiki' action against them. Please note that this is strongly discouraged under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats are often blocked indefinitely until their legal case is withdrawn or resolved. Please try to keep a cool head and work positively with other editors. Thanks. -Will Beback · † · 19:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:3RR

Dear anon-IP. Please read carefully WP:3RR. If you revert more than 3 times in any 24 hour period you'll be blocked. If you'd like to suggest changes, please do so in the Talk page. Again, further reversions can result in a block. Thank you. Crum375 22:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Dear New York IP user, your recent edit, despite your assertions, is considered a reversion for purposes of WP:3RR, as supported by WP:3RR and ArbCom precedent. Please stop - there is no point in you making such reversions, as they will be quickly undone (less than ~20 minutes), and will just result in you getting blocked. --Philosophus T 23:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

24 Hour block for 3RR violation on Yoshiaki_Omura -- 23:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 24 hours due to your violation of the Three revert rule on Yoshiaki_Omura. In the future please be respectful to other editors on the articles you work on and discus major changes on the talk page. ---J.S (T/C) 23:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Notice of Illegal Activities

Wikipedia is lending support to an illegal conspiracy which has engaged in slander, libel, and defamation of character, and supported a conspiracy in restraint of trade. These are criminal and civil offenses under American and International Law. I suggest you unblock this IP as a demonstration of good faith. If you do not do so it will constitute further proof of your active support of clearly illegal activities, and will be judged appropriately. 24.39.123.238 23:34, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

We have already warned you that posting legal threats like this will result in an indefinite block. --Philosophus T 23:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

You are engaging in clearly illegal activities, both as individuals and as a non-profit tax-exempt organization. That is not a threat. It is a statement of simple fact. If you continue to block those who attempt to correct this situation you compound your culpability. Your actions are morally reprehensible and legally indefensible. You are engaged in a conspiracy to support "conventional" medicine and its profits, and to strangle those brave people who are creating an alternate, superior approach to diagnosis and treatment. It is wrong. It is illegal. --Fact, not threat.

If you wish to engage in litigation, that is your legal right. However, I am acting to enforce the rules on wikipedia in which you are in violation. Please readWikipedia:No legal threats. Any threats on this page will not be tolerated and may simply be removed without response. Notice of litigation and/or cease and deist letters should be sent to the Wikimedia foundation here. Have a nice day. ---J.S (T/C) 00:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Enforcing illegal rules makes you a conspirator under American and International Law. Have a nice day.
I'm about an inch away from protecting this page to prevent further implied threats. ---J.S (T/C) 00:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Repeat: I am not making threats, and you know it. You are looking for an excuse to suppress this information, as you have been doing for months, depriving patients of alternative treatment, and professionals of their livelihood. I am INFORMING you. I am not THREATENING you, and you know it. Stop being a Good German, and do the right thing -- Demonstrate Good Faith!

Please review the guidelines about making personal attacks. Also, I have only been involved with this for a few hours. Your assumptions of bad faith are unfounded, I'm a practitioner of alternative medicine. ---J.S (T/C) 00:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
I judge a person by their actions. Yours are those of a "Good German." If you want to demonstrate good faith, then end this block which was made in bad faith, as many others have been made, to suppress information.
I was wondering if you were going to invoke Godwin's Law. ---J.S (T/C) 01:00, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Final warning about legal threats

This is your last warning. If you continue to make legal threats against other users, you will be indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Will Beback · † · 23:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

I have not threatened ANYTHING. I have WARNED you, FOR YOUR OWN GOOD, and that of WIKIPEDIA, that what you are doing is ILLEGAL. If you PRETEND not to be able to TELL THE DIFFERENCE, that is further proof of CULPABILITY. You are conspiring to suppress proven, documented, revolutionary new diagnoses and treatments which have been repeatedly demonstrated around the world, and widely evaluated and published, and which could ease the suffering of MILLIONS. That is a FACT. What you are doing is WRONG and ILLEGAL.

Like all of us your here on this website as a guest. You are trampling all over our rules. That is indeed also wrong.
If you are empowered as a legal-agent of the subject in question feel free to contact the wikimedia foundation.
In the meantime, while your block timer ticks down, I would like to encourage you to read our rules on verifiability, neutrality and original research. ---J.S (T/C) 00:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Yoshiaki Omura

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Yoshiaki Omura. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Yoshiaki Omura/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Yoshiaki Omura/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Srikeit 16:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. | Mr. Darcy talk 22:37, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Making legal threats against Wikipedia or other editors is forbidden. If you continue to make such threats, the block you are currently under will be extended. | Mr. Darcy talk 23:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

I have blocked this account for one month for inappropriate editing of BDORT and its talkpage in violation of the Arbitration Committee decision in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Yoshiaki Omura. Newyorkbrad 22:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)