User talk:24.34.222.139

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Fräulein

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Fräulein, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Vandalize my page if you're so inclined, but it'll just be reverted about and forgotten in a matter of seconds. Thank you. -WarthogDemon 04:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Fräulein. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! --Rrburke 04:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Fräulein. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -WarthogDemon 04:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Fräulein. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. -WarthogDemon 04:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:SnowFire

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a user's page, as you did with User:SnowFire, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -WarthogDemon 04:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reversions to Fräulein, blanking of user pages, disregard of WP:NPOV, etc

Please review WP:VAN, WP:3rr and WP:NPOV and feel free to participate constructively when your block expires. --Rrburke 04:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

User has not been blocked yet. -- ReyBrujo 05:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your vandalism of User:KF, User talk:KF, User:SnowFire, User talk:SnowFire

The pages you blanked "accidentally" belong to editors you were engaged in disputes with on the page Talk:Fräulein, when you were contributing variously as 152.163.100.11, 205.188.116.72, 152.163.100.196 and 152.163.100.136. I would suggest that if you wish to lend even minimal plausibility to the claim that these blankings were "accidents," you might wish to avoid adding an edit summary that reads "blanked the page".

Additionally, repeated unexplained removals of content such as you effected at Fräulein are customarily treated as vandalism, especially when suitable warnings and directions to relevant Wikipedia policy (such as WP:NPOV)) have been issued.

I apologize if you found my response to your vandalism unwelcoming; however, you hardly qualify as a "new editor" inasmuch as you have been flogging this same argument about "Fräulein" since June 2005.

--Rrburke 06:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Block

Excuse me, why was I blocked? I do not recall receiving a warning?24.34.222.139 03:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

You didn't seem to need one. Avoid such behavior in the future, and you won't get blocked. Simple. :) Luna Santin 03:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
That's right, and you've been blocked again. I also blocked the sockpuppets you made to vandalise Lucille Ball. Antandrus (talk) 05:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Block

How Long will this ridiculous block last?

We block people when they vandalise and are otherwise disruptive. It wastes our time. Are you going to vandalise again when the block expires, or are you going to stop? Antandrus (talk) 05:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reverted once more

I have again reverted your edits to Fräulein. They seem to reflect your own biases rather than undisputable facts. If you are unhappy with the article, discuss matters on the talk page. Simply reverting will likely get you banned again. All of this has been explained to you before. Don't complain if other users lose patience with you. Kosebamse 19:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)