User talk:24.229.120.27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Regarding edits made during March 4, 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Fergalicious, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. John254 20:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What?

Why do you have a problem with my legit edit?

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. IrishGuy talk 20:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Merope 20:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Mandy Moore, you will be blocked from editing. Spellcast 14:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Fergalicious

Your recent edit to Fergalicious (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 18:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. FJPB 18:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning for editing Saint Hill (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // MartinBot 13:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Antofalla, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrew Hampe Talk 13:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. – Riana ऋ 13:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Leet speak isn't funny. Maurauth (...)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Paris Hilton, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. KaragouniS 17:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Acalamari 17:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Vandalism

  • Decline reason:

You are not auto-blocked; I blocked you directly for vandalizing pages. — Acalamari 17:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Vandalism

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- Yamla 16:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)