User talk:24.225.240.212

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Judith Krug

It is generally considered highly inappropriate to post the public idewntities of wikipedia users unless thsoe users have chosen to make the connetion between a wikpedia ID and a legal name public. Users have been banned from wikipedia for repeatedly posting such information. Please debate content issues on their merits, not on the basis of personalities. DES (talk) 21:53, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

I've deleted the personal information from the edit history of this article. Please don't do something like that again. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 22:50, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Before you lard a short article with non-notable soundbites, you might want to first start dealing with the copyright violation that makes up the introductory paragraph. --Calton | Talk 05:20, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Carlton - As you know you have been overruled by other Wikipedians and anyone can see your obvious bias as illustrated by your actions and your tone. As to non-notable soundbites, as you term them, the number one person in the USA responsible for ensuring children have continued access to p**rnography in public libraries and public school libraries saying that a 911 terrorist should not have been turned in to the police by a librarian is definately not non-notable. While these quotes standing apart from any background might in and of themselves be non-notable, what makes them extremely notable is the status of the person who said these quotes and the near total control she has over what goes on in American libraries and has had for decades. If the quotes were non-notable, they would not have been censored out by Judith Krug's deputy director (who, in respect of Theresa Knott, will remain nameless) in the first place and repeatedly thereafter until DES resolved the situation, leaving a sample quote and a link to the quotes in the article. Actually, see how DES has contributed significantly to improving the article overall. Please take DES's words and actions as an excellent example for you to follow.

[edit] Section headers

Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings)#Capitalisation specifies that headings should be in sentance case (only the first word and proper nounds are capitalized), and not in title case (all sginificant words are capitalized). I don't fully agree with this, but it is wikipedia style. DES (talk) 16:22, 3 November 2005 (UTC)