User talk:24.214.146.99

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Address the facts. Don't play games with who is posting from what IPs.

You have no way for me to talk to an actual human being by direct email to present FACTS so I have no choice but to make changes to Wiki web pages that are in factual error. Wiki gatekeeper "NLU" or anyone else has not addressed the FACTS I have made in my last post which I am in the Army as are thousands of others who call the M113 the "Gavin" N-O-W, so you or anyone else are in no position to act like God and state that no one is doing something.

Attention:

This IP address, 24.214.146.99, is registered to Knology, an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


[edit] 30 Sep 2006

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Alberto Rivera. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! -Patstuart 00:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Prejudice from Pat Stuart

I actually knew Dr. Alberto Rivera and interviewed him in 1982. He's on the level. The WikiP page on him is not neutral and obviously biased in favor of the pro-Catholic party line. If Pat Stuart is a fact checker and neutrality keeper he's a hypocrite. I resent my changes being tossed out because of a prejudiced Pat Stuart who claims to be a Christian, further compounding his hypocrisy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.214.146.99 (talk • contribs)

As per this comment: these contradictions led to the world-wide Protestant Reformation that re-discovered the essence of the Christian early church is salvation through faith in a pardon by Jesus Christ---not by good behavior in any church. I, for one, am a Protestant, and an unusually dedicated one, so I believe every word of this. But it's clearly a pro-Protestant, anti-Catholic message, and it has no place in the encyclopedia. If you think the rest of the article is biased, I encourage you to work on that. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 15:52, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
BTW, please see WP:NPA. I reverted your edits in good faith. If you have a good reason, and non-POV way of stating them, feel free. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 15:52, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Please stop. If you continue spamming Wikipedia, as you did to M113 Armored Personnel Carrier, you will be blocked from editing. --Nlu (talk) 19:03, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

I am not spamming.

YOU ARE NOT LISTENING.

I AM AN UNITED STATES ARMY INFANTRY OFFICER.

WE CALL THE M113 THE "GAVIN".

WE DO NOT APPRECIATE YOU QUOTING JOHN PIKE OF GLOBALSECURITY AS AN AUTHORITY ON WHAT WE DO; A MAN WHO HAS NEVER BEEN IN THE U.S. MILITARY AS FAR AS I KNOW AND CERTAINLY IS NOT IN NOW.

So stop stating such false statements referenced by Pike who is in no position to speak as an authority on what we in the U.S. Army refer M113s as the "Gavin" and I will not have to constantly correct your erroneous statements.

We have OFFICIAL DoD documents referring to M113s as "Gavins" so we would appreciate you end this non-sense that U.S. forces have "never" called M113s "Gavins" when we have in the past and are doing so now.