User talk:24.203.217.224

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You appear to have made very similar edits 4 times in 24 hours. Please read Wikipedia's rules regarding multiple reverts. Please note: the 3RR rule is not a daily allowance for reverts, it's a maximum limit, and you may still be blocked if you try to game the system. -- The Anome 23:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. The Evil Spartan 23:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
An editor has expressed concern that this IP address has been used by AryeitskiySaldat.
Please refer to [1] (before blocking puppet master) and after blocking the puppet master: [2]. Numerous similar examples exist across multiple articles for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.
You people are saying this about everybody, including one guy who's from New Orleans and another who's from London.

[edit] Contention about the British National Party infobox

Thanks for getting back to me about this. The recommended way of sorting these sorts of issues is to apply Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View (NPOV) policy to achieve a compromise which is acceptable to all sides. This would normally be resolved by a statement on the lines of "X says this, Y says that". I think the problem here is applying NPOV to the tiny space inside the infobox: which is difficult to put inside an infobox.

You might also want to take a look at Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot, and Wikipedia:Edit war. -- The Anome 06:52, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Addition of tangentially related link to British People's Party article

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. --Kuzaar-T-C- 18:32, 13 August 2007 (UTC)