User talk:24.203.217.170

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Nordic theory. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Spartan-James 23:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The influence of Nordicism on Nazism is overwhelmingly demonstrated by sources. I suggest you read Rosenberg's The Myth of the Twentieth Century and read some of Himmler's speeches. Paul B 14:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Because Nordicism was not enshrined in law, whereas "Aryan" (mostly meaning non-Jewish) identity was. Also because the Nazis needed all the support they could get during the war. Nordicism is crucial to Nazi ideology. Even the image you have tried to delete comes from an SS publication. There is no dispute about this at all. Paul B 18:26, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sock puppet of banned Neo-Nazi

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of Laderov.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

Note the IP address from Montreal, the neo-Nazi POV-pushing and the strange over-use of the word "rendering" in his edit notes. This person has usesd several accounts and IP addresses. At least one of his accounts has a message saying the account has been "banned indefinitely." Spylab 20:29, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Changes to quotations

You have repeatedly changed quoted material on the British National Party page. Please don't do that - it's a central rule of good scholarship that direct quotes exactly duplicate the original. If you feel that the quotes need clarification, please add the clarification after the quote. VoluntarySlave 22:08, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on British National Front. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. ~ Wikihermit 02:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Nordicism

  1. Please sign talk comments using ~~~~
  2. Please check the edit history, not my changes to the article.
  3. It's "insinuate"... :)

Rgds, Rich Farmbrough, 20:38 24 June 2007 (GMT).

[edit] British National Party

I flagged the statement you made on the British National Party article as needing a citation. You should add a citation to the article using the ref tag, rather than just removing the "fact" tag. Have a look at WP:CITE for more information. Also, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 22:56, 24 June 2007 (UTC) ) at the end of your comment. -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 22:56, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NPA warning

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

This was the edit which you will be well-advised not to repeat. --John 23:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alison ☺ 23:16, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
  • self-confessed sock-puppetry[1], not to mention revert-warring, incivility, personal attacks, etc - Alison ☺ 23:16, 24 June 2007 (UTC)