User talk:24.159.223.134

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Vegetarianism. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia.--Kubigula (talk) 23:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Mental retardation. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -FisherQueen (Talk) 15:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Loyola Catholic School, you will be blocked from editing. Chris Bradshaw 14:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning


Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Ian. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Will (aka Wimt) 15:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ian, you will be blocked from editing. Will (aka Wimt) 15:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

He did it again on Lagos, reverted. Lio 20:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sam, you will be blocked from editing. -SpuriousQ (talk) 14:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sam, you will be blocked from editing. -SpuriousQ (talk) 14:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Sam (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] You have been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours for vandalism. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. – Rianaऋ 14:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Hi, the recent edit you made to Printing press has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gurchzilla 15:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -SpuriousQ (talk) 15:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to List of saints, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tanthalas39 (talk) 17:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Cue the Strings (talk) 16:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fred Rogers, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 13:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

The recent edit you made to Jesse Crain constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 13:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC))

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nero has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Catgut (talk) 19:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC)