User talk:24.131.169.133

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, c-24-131-169-133.hsd1.mn.comcast.net, is registered to Comcast, an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log
An editor has expressed concern that this IP address has been used by 24.118.153.134.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

Contents

[edit] Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ministry of Magic. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. faithless (speak) 02:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. C'est moi Parlez 03:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user is possibly a socketpuppet of User:24.118.153.134 who got blocked on 4th Dec, 2007 for 2 months. Most of the edits and edit summaries are the same old poor grammer, incorrect speculation source or deliberately mis-interpretation of sources and self-revert edits that make no actual contribution. MythSearchertalk 05:44, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I concur, the edit history from 24.118.153.134 reflects this. --Corsair Armada (talk) 07:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Stop your non-sense in the Late Universal Century article, according to Sunrise official site and Bandai official site for G-Saviour, it is listed under both web-site without ANY mention of it being uncanon. If you want to continue to introduce your own imaginary blatantly distorted "fact" into the article, at least provide a real source and NOT use a source that contradicts you own opinion based imagination. MythSearchertalk 05:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of states with nuclear weapons. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. MythSearchertalk 05:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

You have to stop inserting this unreferenced information and taking out other, sourced estimates. If you keep this up we will have to block you from editing Wikipedia.

If you believe you have valid sources for this information please discuss them on Talk:List of states with nuclear weapons and explain why you believe this is valid, sourced, reliable information.

Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 07:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wilhelmina Slater, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --Corsair Armada (talk) 12:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Robotech has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 12:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to I Am Legend (film), without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 18:03, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Mobile Ops: The One Year War‎, you will be blocked from editing. --Corsair Armada (talk) 20:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to First Robotech War has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Majorly (talk) 00:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Code Pink, you will be blocked from editing. SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Operation Odessa has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 21:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to One Year War, you will be blocked from editing. The newer version did not say anything about unknown, and Gundam Officials claimed the exact number. MythSearchertalk 07:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Antarctic Treaty (Gundam).
    Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. MythSearchertalk 07:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 16:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 3rr

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Directed-energy weapon‎. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Enigma message 16:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Texas, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -MBK004 18:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —C.Fred (talk) 19:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Canon or not

Listen, lack of information does not mean it is not canon, as long as there are other sources backing its canonity, it is still considered canon. Your edits are not straight logic and thus considered [[WP:OR|original research]. Persistently refusing to listen to actual logic puts you in the category of vandalism since you are knowingly introducing errors into the articles. MythSearchertalk 09:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Late Universal Century

Thanks for experimenting with the page Late Universal Century on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Edward321 (talk) 23:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Late Universal Century. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Edward321 (talk) 04:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] G-Saviour

Thanks for experimenting with the page G-Saviour on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on G-Saviour. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on G-Saviour. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Edward321 (talk) 23:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to G-Saviour constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ——Ryan | t • c 23:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Enigma message 04:55, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in G-Saviour. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Edward321 (talk) 04:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 05:13, 23 May 2008 (UTC)