User talk:24.130.9.210

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Polly Young-Eisendrath has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 18:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I think you've changed your mind, but maybe I should have spelled out my reasoning in Discussion, too. I've done so, now.

24.130.9.210 (talk) 19:00, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Taos

Thanks for the note. I've deleted two of the three tags, leaving the one about the plaza. The Hum has its own sourced article; I don't see why we need a citation, when the information is on the page that's linked there. With the other bit, I deleted the tag, not because the sourcing was enough, but because there's already a tag one sentence later. Since there's no source for anything in the paragraph, the single tag suffices to mark the entire paragraph. Nyttend (talk) 04:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Yep. I guess that makes the point well enough. Thanks.
24.130.9.210 (talk) 06:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)