User talk:24.127.156.41

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop removing content from articles. Please read my comment at talk:the eXile. If you still feel that WP:BLP is not being followed, explain your reasoning there. Dsol 08:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

I am rapidly losing patience. How can you say the eXile was the only source for the Wines incident, when I already noted in my edit summary that there was a link to yahoo news? You are not even making an effort to be careful and your indiscriminate blanking verges on vandalism. I am assuming good faith on your part, and that this was an error, but please try to be more careful. Dsol 10:15, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

After multiple warnings and a complete refusal on your part to engage in any discussion or to justify your blanking of pages for over a week, you have been reported for vandalism. Dsol 11:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

from the linked article which you seem not to be willing to read: "The eXile say they settled on Wines for, among other faults, his fawning coverage of current president Vladimir Putin." --April 11, 2001 © 2001 Media Life Dsol 20:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Note: WP:3RR

Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in The eXile‎, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the 3RR. As it is written, the information appears to be sourced, and debatably subject to BLP - please continue the discussion before blindly reverting. Kuru talk 00:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continued edit warring at The eXile. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Pascal.Tesson 02:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
After your block has expired, if you still feel strongly about this issue I hope we can reestablish discussion in a nonbelligerent way. I am open to almost any rewriting of the content as long as well-sourced information is not removed, and suspect that other editors who have disagreed with you have the same opinion. Dsol 08:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC)