User talk:24.116.200.178

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I noticed you are known only as an IP address; that means you are not signed up. To sign up, you only need to click Create account and choose a username and password. You don't need to provide any personal information. If you sign up, you'll have a username that others can use to recognize you and leave you messages on the wiki. You'll be able to sign your name just by typing four tildes (~~~~) when you leave someone else a message. Plus, you (and others) will easily be able to see a list of all your contributions to Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, ask at the Village pump, or feel free to ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ReverendG 19:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

No offense intented, I just noticed that you didn't have a user account.

[edit] Your edits to High fructose corn syrup

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 24.116.200.178! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 23:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


All contributions are strongly appreciated and encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Crossmr may be offensive or unwelcome. In case you are the user, please login under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Kuru talk 02:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the User:Crossmr page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. KatalavenoTC 02:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 15

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Titoxd(?!?) 02:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Titoxd(?!?) 02:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Blocked? A dynamically assigned IP? Whatever! 24.116.200.178 02:40, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edits to my talk page

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users. Thank you.--Crossmr 21:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. --Crossmr 03:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia.
If you feel this block is in error, please place {{unblock}} on this page and explain why, or e-mail me or any other administrator. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.
—bbatsell ¿? ✍ 03:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trying to make it sound different than what happend.

You do realize people can go back and look at a complete record of all edits. Your claming that Crossmr ---- "Maybe Crossmr should not be removing large portions of discussion with no discussion. Improper, irresponsible, arrogant, and just plain wrong. Crossmr is guilty of this over many articles. I guess if you disagree with Crossmr, your opinion / position / comments / discussion just don't count" So somehow this translates into you being able to say --"I am the Egg Man. Coo-coo-ka-choo. " and "Pimp Daddy" (down the whole page) and some other vulgar stuff. You do this and you expect to be taken seriously? Then on Antandrus's page you put "will continue to "abuse" Crossmr as he does them. Perhaps if he toned down his ego a bit, people would have fewer problems with him?" If you continue to 'abuse' anyone, any article pages you as per wiki rules will be the one in trouble due to abuse and vandalism. So please be a good editor you've actually made some in the past why not continue to do so and stay away from vandal edits especially like some of the more vulgar ones in your history [[1]] Thanks for your time. --Xiahou 01:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

You do realize that it's possible I'm talking about edits of comments under, perhaps, a real usre name and not an IP? Hmmm? Maybe? 24.116.200.178 02:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
so you save your IP for the vandalism then? --Xiahou 02:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Suggestion

Why don't you try a different approach? Talk to people sincerely and respectfully; drop the rhetoric such as "arrogant" and "irresponsible"; pay careful attention to our policies such as civility and no personal attacks (gentle hint: they're policies, they're not suggestions) -- you may find that it becomes a whole lot easier to collaborate on article writing. Threatening to "continue to abuse" people cannot help your case. Back off from it for a minute: you're angry. When people are angry they can easily overreact and say things they regret. If someone has done something you consider to be wrong, instead of abusing them, point it out gently and respectfully, and always consider the possibility that you yourself could be wrong. It takes strength to do that but it's worth the trouble, really. Sorry to be a little bit preachy or school-marmy, but I'm just giving you a suggestion from my many decades of life experience, especially in conflict resolution. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 01:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

If you continue to use such attacks as calling other users arrogant, you will be blocked from editing again. --InShaneee 22:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Is that so, InShaneee? Are you Crossmr's sock puppet? Or do you simply not like discussion? I've been engaging in discussion. Have you? 24.116.200.178 23:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Block for escalating incivility

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of one week as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. ~ trialsanderrors 23:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I'll pull a new IP, or be back after a week. Banning my dynamically assigned IP is beyond silly. ADDRESS THE PROBLEM: Crossmr. 24.116.200.178 23:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Any attempts to circumvent this block will result in its extension, as well as subsequent IPs/Usernames being blocked on sight. Incivility is inexcusable. --InShaneee 23:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Since you're being blocked for a pattern of behavior that won't make a difference. You'll just be blocked with any account or IP that continues the incivility. ~ trialsanderrors 01:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)