User talk:24.114.255.83

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page Malton, Ontario on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Extraordinary Machine 21:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Tie Domi. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -Kubigula (ave) 02:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] 06-Nov-2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Soni Pabla on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.Chris Kreider 19:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Toronto Maple Leafs. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JDtalk 17:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Toronto Maple Leafs, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JDtalk 17:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Diurnal animal, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Bart133 (t) (c) 22:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Juba (sniper)

Your recent edit to Juba (sniper) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 03:53, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] March 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Grapefruit. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sir Vicious 19:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during April 23, 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Jurassic Park (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 11:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ walkie-talkie 16:51, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Question ... why did you undo the addition of past employees to the Past and Current Employees section on the CFTR (AM) article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.114.255.83 (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2007 (UTC).

Further to the re-undone edit to the Past and Current employees section of the CFTR (AM) article... You removed the addition of past employees to the article, labelling it "irrelevant clutter added by an ip with vandal history". My contention with this is that the existing list of "past and current employees" is entirely current employees. Some of the journalists who've worked at this station since its launch are among the most accomplished and respected broadcasters in Toronto radio history. Some others began their career at 680 News and moved on to noteworthy careers elsewhere. If past employees are not to be listed under "past and current employees", the heading should be changed. To consider Toronto broadcast legends such as Dick Smythe, Evelyn Macko, Larry Silver and others "irrelevant clutter" belittles their contribution to the station described in the article. If they are irrelevant, then so is, for example, John Landecker, cited in the History portion of the article. As for the IP with the vandal history -- I can't speak to any previous edits made from this IP, as it's a shared pool. This is the first edit I've made on Wikipedia.

Many thanks for your consideration.

Hi there. My deepest apologies if I have pegged you inappropriately as a vandal. I recommend creating your own account before you make any more edits. That way, your history is your own, and not sullied by the villainy of others. As far as the edits in question, I still believe a long list of past employees is an example of clutter, not information. It is one thing to mention notable present and past employees, but I believe you list goes too far. You are right that the heading "past and current employees" is misleading, and I think it ought to be changed to "Notable past and current employees." I have stressed the word "notable" twice now, so I guess I've made my point. I hope you continue to contribute meaningfully to Wikipedia, and do not let my hyper-vigilance when it comes to anonymous edits turn you off. --Janus Shadowsong (talk)/(contribs) 19:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Velupillai Prabhakaran. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. snowolfD4( talk / @ ) 21:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC) Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Velupillai Prabhakaran. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. snowolfD4( talk / @ ) 21:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] June 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. James, La gloria è a dio 13:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Margita Bangová

Hi, I noticed on the talkpage of Margita Bangová, you showed interest in the article. This is just to let you know User:Desiphral has listed the article for deletion (I suspect for his/her own personal agenda). I invite you to have your say at Margita Bangová. Thanks, --125.237.100.214 10:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Hippocrates, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron83 12:27, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] August 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Mohammed Abdillahi Ogsadey, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~ Wikihermit 18:44, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maksimir Stadium. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Katieh5584 19:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please Use Edit Summaries

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Tiptoety 22:33, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

You have recently vandalized a Wikipedia page, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own. Tiptoety 22:33, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia talk:Featured articles, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron83 01:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Montreal Canadiens, you will be blocked from editing. --Djsasso 19:53, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Squirt (disambiguation) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cream (talk) 17:38, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Michelle Branch has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Werdan7T @ 00:08, 23 May 2008 (UTC)