User talk:24.11.163.197

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] CCI

Do you have first hand knowledge about CCI ? Tintin (talk) 14:14, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

yes i do

  • Different online sources give different numbers for the capacity of the Brabourne Stadium (20,000, 25,000 or 35,000). Do you know if there are any official numbers which are accepted by CCI ?
Also, it would be good if you could take a look at the article on Brabourne Stadium. We are planning to expand it considerably over the next few weeks. Tintin (talk) 15:07, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Yes, I am a member of the CCI club, if you have any questions let me know. I will find out the exact figure, as we just made new renovations to the cricket stadium.
Thank you. Wikipedia also have verifiability rules. So it would be good if you can also quote a source (CCI journal for 2005, or something like that) Tintin (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Kcordina Talk 15:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


Who the fuck are you to tell me what vandalism is regarding RSS or Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh. That organization represents vandalism, at least Britannica gets it stuff right, unlike u.. little bitches, asking me about CCI CLUB or brabourne stadium.

[edit] April 11, 2006

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 21:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop vandalizing

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pilot|guy 23:29, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove notices from this page, it is considered vandalism. Thanks TigerShark 23:35, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Please see the removing warnings entry here. Thanks TigerShark 00:12, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 2006- Vandalizing The Lakshmi Mittal Page

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Lakshmi Mittal. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki 03:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

I second NawlinWiki's request to stop vandalizing the Lakshmi Mittal page. You have continued re-inserting irrelevant/nonsensical information even after these repeated warnings. Wiki administrators attention is called to this user. Jedimindtrick

Reply to Unsigned Message from 24.11.163.197 (also posted on Jedimindtrick)

Firstly, please create an account and sign comments (using 4 tildes: ~) during any such discussions on Wikipedia

Second, please note that while you are always encouraged to be bold in editing, some norms for inputting information exist. One of these is that all such information needs to be verifiable. If, as you claim, it is a well known fact that this 'Devesh Poddar' is the nephew of Lakshmi Mittal, then please cite sources. If it cannot be verified, then such information unfortunately cannot be on Wikipedia, even if it is true.

Third, there is also the question of relevance. On this Wikipedia has the following to say: " If an allegation or incident is notable, relevant, and well-documented by reliable published sources, it belongs in the article — even if it's negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it. If it is not documented by reliable third-party sources, leave it out"- see Rules for biographies of living persons.

Unless, therefore, you are able to provide some reliable third-party source for this information, I am afraid no Wiki editor will be persuaded of its relevance and notability. Jedimindtrick 10:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding this information unless you can cite a source. Thanks TigerShark 22:09, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks

With regards to your comments on User:Jedimindtrick: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users." Please keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. TigerShark 22:03, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Repeated Vandalism/Personal Attacks on the talk page for Jedimindtrick

I am mentioning this vandalism of my User Talk page here because it seems related to the above comments by TigerShark and also seems likely to be the same person committing the vandalism:

Can whoever is deleting the talk page and its contents (unregistered user at 67.172.89.186, possibly the same as the unregistered user at 24.11.158.76 and 24.11.163.197) kindly stop doing so? Please do not remove notices from that talk page, it is considered vandalism. Please see the removing warnings entry here.

The contents of the talk page are valid and relevant to the user and cannot be deleted. If the vandalism persists, your actions will be reported to administrators and you may be banned from editing this page. Thanks for your cooperation.

Jedimindtrick 16:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC)