Talk:23rd Army (Soviet Union)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
23rd Army (Soviet Union) is part of the WikiProject Russian history, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Russian history. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the assessment scale.
23rd Army (Soviet Union) is part of WikiProject Soviet Union, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the Soviet Union. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the class scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Slaughterhouse

yes I have, the Army is on page 317...but I just added it without looking (copy and paste) with all the other stuff. Its not very good--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♣ 07:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] OOB formatting

I'm not sure why you did that, but the standard way to present an OOB, which is what this is, is in a table format. Eventually the subunits and COs will be added, and this is best done in the table format. In fact this is how it is presented everywhere else in Wikipedia--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♣ 11:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Er, no. When I ran through 51st Army (Soviet Union) to A-class status I had to change it to text, and one of the recommendation to fix 5th Army (Soviet Union) to A-class was that as well I think; anyway, that's how I did it following the recommendation for the 51 Army. If it's got a heading immediately over it, it looks better, but 'Includes:...' is not a style that gets articles promoted; strictly a temporary arrangement. Buckshot06 (talk) 11:54, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, this is not ready for the pretty table of the A-class article, so I hadn't done one. I guess there is no restriction in having a table OOB in the class it is in now, is there?--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♣ 12:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)