User talk:219.78.220.232

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

• The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
• The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
• The ability to start new pages.
• The ability to rename pages.
• The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
• The ability to upload images.
• The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
• Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with four tildes (~~~~), which will let others know who left it. --Casper2k3 13:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Multiple IP vandalism warning

You have repeatedly been warned to stop your vandalism of articles on Wikipedia when you came here using other IPs. Please stop. You are welcome to contribute real edits to Wikipedia but all vandalism done by you will be reverted and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor and create an account. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own.

--Casper2k3 13:12, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Accusation denied. If this was the USA I would have sued your arse by now.

[edit] Please don't edit other user's user pages: User:Gwernol

Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent, as you did with User:Gwernol. It may be seen as vandalism. --Casper2k3 13:18, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Final Warning - Further vandalism will get you blocked: Jellyfish

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Jellyfish, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Casper2k3 13:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] FYI

From WP:3RR#Reverting_vandalism: "In cases of simple vandalism... the three-revert rule does not apply" --Casper2k3 13:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Final Warning - Making further legal threats against other users will get you indefinately blocked

This is your last warning. If you continue to make legal threats against other users, you will be indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Casper2k3 13:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for WP:3RR violation

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Gwernol 13:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

I haven't read all of what's gone on but it seems like 2 experienced users have hounded yet another anon out. This must stop and I think you'll agree that it is completely against Wikipedia's ambition. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.73.32.176 (talk • contribs) .

Yes you have read it all, since it is clearly the same user posting from a dynamic IP. Please at least have the honesty to admit who you are.

I don't follow. Please explain what you mean here.

You were in violation of WP:3RR on at least two occasions today. The addition you were making to Jellyfish was inappropriate for multiple reasons:

• It was unsourced, so unverifiable

Correct if wrong but the whole article is uncited. Please be reasonable.

• It included a completely irrelevant reference to Golden showers

Wrong. User was making distinction between the two acts.

• It used inappropriate informalo language (piss instead of urinate)

Piss is a widely accepted term. Even has a disamb page.

You were politely asked to discuss your change, but insisited on edit warring to include it. You then trolled by talk page and that of User:Capser2k3 with inappropriate warning messages. If this is the quality of your contributions, Wikipedia is improved by you not posting here. Gwernol 14:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Please add your comments below previous comments, instead of interleaving them. Please sign your comments by adding ~~~~ after them. Your justification for not sourcing your comment ("the whole article is uncited") is incorrect; just beacause there are other unsourced statement does not allow you to make them. The use of the colloquial term "piss" instead of "urine" is unencyclopedic. Its also worth noting that people rarely urinate on other people's jellyfish wounds; in fact most beaches have vinegar bottles to neutralize stings and even if thye did resort to urine, they would rare have another person directly urinate on them as you claim. Yet anotehr reason why your spurious inclusion of "golden showers" was nothing more than internal linkspamming. Stop pretending you are not the same user; you are clearly a sockpuppet on a dynamic IP. Gwernol 14:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

I may be wrong but I didnt see anything in the rules about not interleaving comments or signing comments. Is it compulsory I do these things or are they just guidlines? Please stop trying to dictate your own personal preferences onto others. I still have no clue what you are referring to regarding the IP thing. I hope you can come down from your high horse in the near future.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.73.32.176 (talk • contribs) .

These are conventions that are followed everywhere on Wikipedia talk pages. Signing is just plain good manners, not interleaving makes it much easier to follow conversations. You are the same editor who was blocked from editing as User:219.78.220.232. Your edit patterns and IP address confirm this. Gwernol 15:02, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Your conclusions are unfounded. Such accusations are childish and incorrect. You remind me of a young Hitler.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.73.32.176 (talk • contribs) .

I'm a rather mediocre painter from turn of the century Vienna? One of the more interesting insults I've seen flung about by a troll/vandal. Well done, at least you are imaginative as you continue your crusade to damage Wikipedia. Gwernol 18:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]