User talk:218.186.9.3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To edit, please log in.
Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. |
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since this IP has been receiving warnings from February 2006, these warnings are likely stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks. | ||
---|---|---|
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it. | ||
January 2007Your recent edit to Total refraction (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 10:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC) Your recent edit to I Belong to Me (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 10:22, 16 January 2007 (UTC) I am sorry that my correction to Augustus was wrong. However, it does not merit a "vandalism" tag. Please do not think that I am so free as to go around vandalising. Do not generalise and discriminate against IP addresses please. --218.186.9.3 15:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Why am i blocked! my brother did it. stupid brother...PLz unblock me...i have contributions to make. Can I make an account? Then you can ban the IP or something apart from it and it should be fine. I didn't actually make any of these edits, and I want to contribute. Also, to the person above me, GTFO my IPz. :D -218.186.9.3 (talk) 08:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC) Why?I've a account in Wiki(Paul_1953),but why so many computers are locked t' the IP address?I've never vandalized anyone's page(s),yet keep getting blocked.PLEASE,everyone pls have consideration for every self! -Paul 1953 February 2007Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Glossary of ballet. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. H4cksaw (talk) 00:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Billboard Hot 100. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - RJASE1 06:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Most common words in English. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -SpuriousQ (talk) 08:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Proton Waja, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Big Brother 1984 09:35, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Edit to California Gold RushThis is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Ronbo76 14:44, 16 February 2007 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to DNA, you will be blocked from editing. TimVickers 18:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC) Your edit to Fat feminismWelcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Heimstern Läufer 05:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Sales, you will be blocked. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Davidkazuhiro 15:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Regarding edits made to Kyoko HasegawaThank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 218.186.9.3! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \.photobucket\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 03:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC) Regarding edits made 26 February 2007 to Daniel RadcliffeWelcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Rettetast 09:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC) Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Unity Secondary School. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Prolog 07:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
March 2007Regarding edits made 4 March 2007 to Sleight of handWelcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. 84.49.149.1 10:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Regarding your edits to Goods and Services Tax (Singapore):Your recent edit to Goods and Services Tax (Singapore) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 11:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Your edit to D-CyberPlease do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to D-Cyber. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Mschel 15:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC) Thank you for experimenting with the page Dust Bowl on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Quintote 12:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Dust Bowl on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Prolog 12:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Junk Rig. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Quintote 12:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Regarding edits made during March 12, 2007 (UTC) to President of ChinaWelcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Myanw 11:50, 12 March 2007 (UTC)Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to World Trade Center, you will be blocked from editing. Real96 09:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to World Trade Center, you will be blocked from editing. -SpuriousQ (talk) 09:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for chronic vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. John Reaves (talk) 09:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
John Reaves (talk) 09:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
April 2007
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — Moondyne 12:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
— Moondyne 12:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
June 2007This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to StarHub, you will be blocked from editing. --Kbdank71 15:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Your recent edit to Ang Soon Tong (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 01:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC) June 2007This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ang Soon Tong, you will be blocked from editing. James, La gloria è a dio 02:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
July 2007Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cao Cao, you will be blocked from editing. Xiahou 01:23, 21 July 2007 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Imroy 10:02, 22 July 2007 (UTC) Your sexual fantasies about your schoolOn this edit of yours: It's hard to fuck a school, but if you really want to fantasize about doing so please write this up on your own user page and not on mine. -- Hoary 12:21, 22 July 2007 (UTC) This is your last warning.The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:Hoary, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 16:39, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Acalamari 17:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Acalamari 17:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
August 2007Your edit to HuntingWelcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Hunting do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Dave (Talk | contribs) 15:03, 4 August 2007 (UTC) Your edit to Deer huntingPlease do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Deer hunting. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. — Dave (Talk | contribs) 15:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Regarding edits to Daren Tan Sze WeiThank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 218.186.9.3! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule img\.photobucket\.com/.*\.jpg\b, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 09:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. AntiSpamBot 09:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC) October 2007Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tara Reid, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. PTSE 17:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
ThanksDespite all these other very negitive comments, thanks for fixing up some obnoxious wording on Phillips Exeter Academy. --iriseyestalk 18:27, 13 October 2007 (UTC) You're a witty fellowYou're a witty fellow, but this edit of yours belongs on your talk page, not mine. If you'd done it to a third party's user page, I'd have written something angry here. You wouldn't want that, I'm sure. -- Hoary 03:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Renji Abarai worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ryan Postlethwaite 11:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC) November 2007Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to GetAmped, you will be blocked from editing. Mentifisto 05:18, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to GetAmped, you will be blocked from editing. --Oxymoron83 08:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a period of 3 months from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Jmlk17 11:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
February 2008Hi, the recent edit you made to Catholic Junior College has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 13:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Sump pump, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Global Indian International School Singapore do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Warning NoticeAlthough everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, your recent edits on Feb 8, as you did to Yusheng, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed:
If you revert or continue with your controversial edits again, it is considered as vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges next, and embarrassment for the individuals and groups who were being promoted. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 10:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC) February 2008Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Singapore Flyer, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Singapore Flyer was changed by 218.186.9.3 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-02-09T12:13:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2008 (UTC) The recent edit you made to Tony DeBlois constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —Animum (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)) Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to James Henry Pullen. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Antonio Lopez (talk) 15:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC) This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to John Laycock. —Animum (talk) 19:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC) |
Caution
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Grizzly bear, you will be blocked from editing. P|^|C (talk) 10:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Scarlett Johansson, you will be blocked from editing. P|^|C (talk) 10:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
-- Ed (Edgar181) 10:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your recent edits to User talk:218.186.9.3 have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Vivio TestarossaTalk Who 11:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
With regard to your comments on User talk:218.186.9.3: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Vivio TestarossaTalk Who 11:43, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |