User talk:218.186.9.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:
This IP address, 218.186.9.2, is registered to StarHub. It is currently the subject of an open abuse report, which can be found here. If you block this address, please contact the investigator or contactor listed there by posting on their talk page or the talk page of the report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, StarHub, to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).
Attention:

This host, 218-186-9-2.cache.maxonline.com.sg, is registered to StarHub (Singapore), an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log
To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network.

In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Comments: 3 month block


Contents

[edit] October 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Eva Perón, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. F-402 15:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Addition of http://www.iHipo.com external link

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to internship. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. -- SiobhanHansa 14:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edits in question, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Your edit to November 8

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page November 8 worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Accurizer 02:59, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Richard Dawkins, you will be blocked from editing. Triwbe 05:58, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Richard Dawkins, you will be blocked from editing. Triwbe 05:59, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Only Warning

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Wangan Midnight, you will be blocked from editing. You have do too much thing which were seen as vandalism.

[edit] October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Rothschild family. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Triwbe 08:03, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Illuminati, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. Triwbe 08:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to World peace. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Triwbe 09:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Book of Revelation. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Triwbe 09:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] November 2007

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Chelsea Charms. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tabercil 13:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Triple Nine, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Triple Nine was changed by 218.186.9.2 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-16T08:33:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 08:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of Dead or Alive characters, you will be blocked from editing. Harland1 (talk) 17:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Such behaviour is not tolerated on Wikipedia - when you return from your block, you are encouraged to take a fresh attitude to the encyclopedia and make constructive contributions. If you require assistance in editing Wikipedia, you may be interested in this useful resource. Once again, vandalism is not welcome and will not be permitted.

Kind regards,
Anthøny 18:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by
adding the text "{{unblock|your reason here}}" below this text, or contact me.

[edit] January 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Regimental Police worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Maser (Talk!) 10:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Team Galaxy (TV series) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 06:27, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 10:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Kamus Dewan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Acs4b T C U 11:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ultraviolet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 11:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism to Ultraviolet - warning bv

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Ultraviolet, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 11:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 11:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Blood plasma has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Werdan7T @ 14:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the LAST WARNING you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Singapore, you will be blocked from editing. -- Dave1185 (talk) 09:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nude beach has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Becksguy (talk) 08:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Schools in Yishun. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Schools in Yishun was changed by 218.186.9.2 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-13T13:23:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to North View Secondary School, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: North View Secondary School was changed by 218.186.9.2 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-13T13:25:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Central Java. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SatuSuro 14:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Central Java. Waggers (talk) 14:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Diwali, you will be blocked from editing. From-cary (talk) 09:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked for a period of 3 months from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

GBT/C 09:58, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request to unblock

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "it's a shared IP on a cache serverI don't think that I've been able to edit one page on wikipedia in the last 2 years without having to log in first because this one IP is blocked for 1, 2 and now 3 months for the occasional actions of a few total idiots and some moderators flagging vandalism which is nothing of the sort. 4,000,000 people live in Singapore, perhaps 500,000 of them access the internet through this cache server. All repeated blocks of longer and longer duration do is prevent the majority of people who make constructive edits from making them without registering an account, which most people won't bother to do. The moderators of wikipedia really should look at the total history of edits from an IP, especially one so obviously shared, and deal with the very small percentage of moronic posts by reversion instead of just wholescale blocking the contributions of ... well a country. That's what moderation is about, not just turning off the tap, it's about (in this case) reverting the small percentage of garbage in a stream of mostly good content"

Decline reason: "Given the level of vandalism from this IP it is unwise for us to unblock it at this time. However, the good news is you may still edit. Simply create an account at a different computer, or if that is unfeasable, you may request that an account be created for you by emailing accounts-enwiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org with your requested username and password. Then, an account will be created for you, and you can edit Wikipedia freely without fear of being caught by this block. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 16:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

That stock form reply really didn't answer the point raised. I doubt most people in Singapore who are forced to use that IP (as it's one of THE cache servers for Starhub) will ever go to the trouble of creating an account to edit wikipedia. So you're allowing the actions of a few to prevent many people making legitimate edits. As moderators you shouldn't just block, block and block, sometimes you need to revert bad edits and vandalism but leave the ability of good posters to post.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.9.2 (talk • contribs)

Your ability to edit is not harmed. Just create an account as described. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 14:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Pardon me for intruding into the conversation here and for saying this: As a fellow Singaporean, I do think it would be for the greater good and common interest of every wikipedians to have yourself a registered account in order to start edit and be accountable for your own edits. Anyway, we do appreciate good edits and even those edits in good faith but the mis-understanding which this particular IP address has caused for the wiki-community is beyond description, last I counted there was twenty six bad edits OR online vandalism logged to this IP address alone for the six month period from October 2007 to March 2008. So what say you now? To register OR not to register? --Dave1185 (talk) 20:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Why not talk to your ISP about subscribing to an RSS feed of this page and taking action against vandals who use this IP? I'll bet people would be much less likely to vandalize if they knew they'd get busted for it. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 00:22, 24 May 2008 (UTC)