User talk:217.42.223.93

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Stoke-on-Trent

If you wish to do such wholesale removal of tags without adding any information for which they were placed, you really should discuss it first on Talk:Stoke-on-Trent.  DDStretch  (talk) 22:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Please don't keep reverting the removal of tags on that article - go to Talk:Stoke-on-Trent and argue the case for removing them. As it happens, I agree with you and have said so there, but you're going about it the wrong way. -- Arwel (talk) 23:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Stoke-on-Trent. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --John 23:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

This is your last warning.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Stoke-on-Trent, you will be blocked from editing. —AldeBaer 23:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Stoke-on-Trent

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Regan123 23:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Stoke-on-Trent. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — TKD::Talk 23:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.