User talk:217.33.92.186

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Lincs FM Group articles

Hi there.

I am concerned with the removal of verifiable text from the Trax FM article, relating to the re-location of Trax FM from Bassetlaw to Doncaster. I also noticed that all but one of your contributions to Wikipedia have been to Lincs FM Group articles, so I have reason to believe you may have connections with the aforementioned radio group. This could be in violation of conflict of interest guidelines.

If you could be as kind to declare your involvement with the Lincs FM Group (if any) preferably under the current discussion on the conflict of interest noticeboard (at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard under the title of Trax FM), on this talk page or the Trax FM talk page.

Thank you for your co-operation. --tgheretford (talk) 15:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Another editor has reverted your changes that you have made to the Worksop article. Please note, that due to the edits that you have made and as to how I believe there is a conflict of interest, I have resubmitted my concerns at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard, where you should declare your involvement with the Lincs FM Group and you can comment further on the edits you have made in relation to Wikipedia policies. --tgheretford (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Trax FM

The following warning is specifically dealing with the with the removal of the co-location paragraph of the Trax FM article:

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Trax FM. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --tgheretford (talk) 09:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

To add, the other edit you made to another paragraph in the article was in violation of netural point of view policy with no verifiable information, and so I agree with its removal from the article. If you do have a problem with the inclusion of the co-location paragraph, you need to discuss your objection to its inclusion on the articles talk page. Please don't keep removing the paragraph without reason, as removal of verifiable content from articles, regardless of whether you agree to it or not, can be seen as vandalism and you may be blocked if you continue to remove verifiable content without reason. See also Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. Regards --tgheretford (talk) 09:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] To confirm

217.33.92.186 does indeed resolve to lincsfmplc.co.uk, which indicates that the person making these edits is an employee, as members of the public would not have such ready access to this system.

I am concerned that this user has also made edits to the page Trust AM, which seems odd for someone from another station to do. This is how I found this talk page as I was also trying to verify the identity of the mystery editor. TrustAM 01:30, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Philip Oakey, you will be blocked from editing.

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to LUTV has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Closedmouth (talk) 06:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC)