User talk:217.171.129.71

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 217.171.129.71, is registered to 3 mobile broadband, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] November 2007

Your recent edit to Bath Rugby (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tai shogi

Hi,

Could you tell us your references for your changes to Tai shogi? You're removing a lot of pieces. I know a lot of the info in the article is suspect, since the Japanese article is inconsistent, but I'm afraid it will get hopelessly confused if we're not careful. The changes you made are safe in the page history, so we can always restore them, and I put a note on the Discussion page so that people know you were there. Thanks, kwami 22:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Talk:Total Nonstop Action Wrestling

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. TJ Spyke 22:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Your recent edit to Spider-Man (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 21:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Confirmed as vandalism — Blanked page and insert Homophobic comment. Richard Harvey (talk) 09:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Warwickshire (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Confirmed as vandalism — Insert Homophobic comment into text . Richard Harvey (talk) 09:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Final Warning Your vandalism to the Richard Dannatt article has been reverted. Editing the page of a living person to indicate they have died is seriously bad editing and not funny at all. Please refrain from vandalising articles. Continued vandalism may result in your IP address being blocked. Richard Harvey (talk) 09:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during February 2, 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Kenny Lunt page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers. John254 20:52, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bebo. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Cometstyles 15:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Northenden, you will be blocked from editing. Nepenthessss (talk) 20:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Enoch Powell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. CounterFX (talk) 22:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] edits for Feb 21, 20-08

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Dlohcierekim 23:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Carrot Top has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 20:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to NASA, you will be blocked from editing. EJF (talk) 20:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Slogans of anti-gay ideology, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 16:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, as you did in De Havilland Comet‎, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ... richi (hello) 23:19, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Superdrug, you will be blocked from editing. ... richi (hello) 23:20, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] April 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Mitch Hewer, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CardinalDan (talk) 01:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Clitoris (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 03:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pubic hair. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pubic hair was changed by 217.171.129.71 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-04-24T03:22:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:22, 24 April 2008 (UTC)