User talk:216.93.229.62

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] We get the idea - you don't like Hillary

Please quit adding your point of view to articles. --B 05:00, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Christopher Dodd, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gamaliel (Angry Mastodon! Run!) 15:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article, as you did to Chelsea Clinton, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Crockspot 00:09, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Phil Hendrie

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Phil Hendrie. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tabercil 15:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Gamaliel (Angry Mastodon! Run!) 16:44, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Gamaliel (Angry Mastodon! Run!) 23:47, 21 August

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Phil Hendrie, you will be blocked from editing. You've been warned on many occasions. Not to insert false claims to about Hendrie's demise. Or others notable people's demises. You, once again-- have directly violated the the WP:BLP guidelines.ELO MnLynx Fan77 15:20, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removing of warnings or messages

Please refrain from removing messages here. All Wikipedians keep past messages on talk pages, even if they're irrelevant now. Thank you. --Hasek is the best 22:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wanting an unblock

Can you please unblock me. I have waited long enough. I have never waited this long before, even if I have made more bad edits.

Sorry, when the block has expired you may edit. The more blocks, the longer the block. However if you want to make constructive edits, I suggest you find a topic or interest you are familiar with, then add a bit more detail, without braking the Neutral Point of view policy. This means you cannot say if something is bad - because some other people may like it. And I'd recommend you to create an account, so you will be more well-known. And, to get a better style of writing, read some featured articles to get the idea of grammar here. FAs are Wikipedia's best work. --Hasek is the best 22:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced controversial information to Wikipedia articles on living persons, as you did to Steve Martin. Thank you. Sethacus 00:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 2 weeks as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Tabercil 23:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "why should I wait 2 weeks. How about 6 to 8 days instead, now that sounds more reasonable. I have not done as much bad things as others"

Decline reason: "Unfortunately, I see no indication that you intend to stop inserting misinformation into Wikipedia, and from the wording of your request I get the impression you know what you are doing is wrong. — krimpet⟲ 05:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] October 2007

You don't seem to be getting the point. Since you insist upon deliberately inserting false information into articles, I've blocked this IP address for 3 months. Gamaliel (Angry Mastodon! Run!) 16:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am really honest. I did not know what would happen if I pressed undo. I am sorry I made the mistake, I did not try to make the same crap come on the page. Please, give me another chance. I am not lying that this really was an accident. Now I know what happens if I press undo. Please, just one more chance."

Decline reason: "Given the plethora of warnings and blocks in your history, I see no reason to assume that abuse will not continue from this IP, and am upholding the current block as it stands. --Kinu t/c 06:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.