User talk:216.54.1.206

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 216.54.1.206, is used by Chesapeake Public Library System and may be shared by multiple users using public terminals. In the case of organizations using proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. (In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism in which case we invite you to try again at a later time or from a different computer.)

In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Chesapeake Public Library System to report network abuse.

Public terminals may have set expiry times (usually 30 minutes or 60 minutes), so if blocking the IP please bear this in mind.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
An editor has expressed concern that this IP address has been used by blocked user Akemi Mokoto.
Please refer to this contribution for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

This message is regarding the article Obsidian. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -Abe Dashiell (t/c) 18:28, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Total Nonstop Action wrestling

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. TJ Spyke 17:32, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during August 29, 2006 (UTC) to Bill Gates

Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. talk to JD wants e-mail 19:11, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Bill Gates. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Alf melmac 19:11, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oct 2006

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Animal cell on Wikipedia! Your test worked, and thank you for reverting or removing it yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start. Again, thanks, and we hope that you will like Wikipedia. Ginkgo100 talk · e@ 22:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Diabetes mellitus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 00:26, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Diabetes mellitus, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:26, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 2nd block

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Universe has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 21:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment. I find it hilarious that you will vandalize a page such as Universe with you religious views where they don't belong, yet you're on top of it when someone vandalizes Happy Ending with THIER religious outbursts. I don't think Wikipedia is the place for you. Move alone.