User talk:216.52.75.7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] 2005

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Canderson7 21:37, 25 September 2005 (UTC)


Advice

You may not be aware of it, but Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Manual of Style, which defines house styles here, has specific rules on the house of honorifics or styles in articles. Styles such as Majesty, Royal Highness, Holiness and others, and their acronyms (eg, HM, HRH, HH, etc) are no longer used in articles. Instead a specific template called an infobox is added into articles to list the relevant style. Please do not use these styles in the text of articles. They will simply be deleted. If you see any in an article, please remove them. Thank you. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 18:44, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 2006

Warning

Please stop adding in styles and their acronyms into Wikipedia articles. It is against the Wikipedia:Manual of Style rules Wikipedians are required to follow. All regal styles you have added in will be deleted.

This is your Final warning. Despite advice to stop, you have continued to insert honorifics and regal styles into articles. That is contrary to the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Continued breaking of MoS rules, when you have been asked to stop, may be seen as vandalism. Any more deliberate vandalism may lead to you being blocked from editing Wikipedia.

You will not receive another warning.

Canderson7 is an idiot.

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 24 hours for posting comments in articles calling other users idiots, after warning about previous edits. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Do not erase this page or any of the warnings on it. Doing so is also considered vandalism.


Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 48 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism.

FearÉIREANN\(caint) 21:21, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, was unaware of 'house styles'. The style 'Charles, Prince of Wales' is incorrect, but I have no wish to expend any more time attempting to correct this ignorance. It is exceptionally bizarre that I would be 'warned' and 'finally warned' and then successively blocked twice(?) for two minor edits in good faith. What has Wikipedia come to?

Regarding this 'IP after IP' and 'Talk pages' business, just to whom do you imagine you are referring? Perhaps you attribute everyone who changes styles to one individual; if this is the case then may I recommend psychotherapy?

--216.52.75.7

That is complete nonsense. You were well aware of it. You have been told repeatedly over and over and over on IP after IP after IP. Users have told you on user talk pages, talk pages etc. But you still keep doctoring articles even though the rules of Wikipedia have been explained in detail to you repeatedly, usually sneaking in them in when you think people have forgotten your past antics. Your behaviour has been complained about by users for ages. You were repeatedly warned that if you did not stop it would be treated as vandalism and you would be blocked. Even after other blocks you still continued your one person campaign to ignore MoS and NC rules that had been explained regularly to you. At least this time finally it seems to have gotten through to you that you cannot sweep through articles deleting stuff and adding in stuff contrary to the Manual of Style. And the only reason why it was just two edits this time was because this time you were caught, so only two had to be corrected, rather than a long line of them like before. You have long since exhausted the tolerance of other users, who regularly found themselves undoing your edits and pleading with you to stop. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 21:35, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Where is your evidence? Where are your sources? For a single person to be able to tyrannically block and insult a well-intentioned user is appalling. This experience has completely soured my opinion of Wikipedia. The hypocrisy, arrogance, and ignorance are unbearable. You should be ashamed of yourself. Yet another case of an incompetent bureaucracy obstructing progress and knowledge. Prospective users, beware!
----216.52.75.7


[edit] Tax protester constitutional arguments

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Famspear 20:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Godwin's law. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. In particular, please do not remove dispute or maintenance templates from articles unless and until the dispute or maintenance need has been resolved. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 09:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "original unblock reason"

Decline reason: "No reason given for unblock. — Yamla 21:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 18:51, 15 April 2008 (UTC)