User talk:216.37.64.100

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 216.37.64.100, is registered to Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland and may be shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

However, you might still be unable to edit Wikipedia if the IP you are using is blocked due to a MediaWiki "feature". In such a case you could request to be unblocked.

In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland to report network abuse.

Your recent edit to Shamita Shetty was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 19:32, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Buchanan-Hermit™..SCREAM!!!.... 19:02, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning for editing Usher (entertainer). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // Tawkerbot2 19:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. Shanel § 19:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Porqin 15:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia articles as you did to Lindsay Lohan; it is considered vandalism. If this activity continues, this IP will ble blocked from editing, affecting anyone who uses this IP. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 16:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

You have recently vandalized the Wikipedia article Riya Sen among others, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor and create an account. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own.

Contents

[edit] Your edits to William Brewster (Pilgrim)

Your recent contribution to the Wikipedia article William Brewster (Pilgrim) is very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in William Brewster (Pilgrim)? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits this article. Thanks! --KeithB 19:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

The recent edit you made to Daytona Cubs constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. If you are interested in contributing to the project, see the Introduction. However, please do not continue to vandalize pages. Thanks – Qxz 18:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Roller coaster (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Chimpanzee, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Ukulele. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- Sakurambo 桜ん坊 17:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Mecca (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Shun (Chinese leader), even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 14:12, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Cassidy:

Your recent edit to Cassidy (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 16:25, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rachel, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rachel was changed by 216.37.64.100 (c) (t) replacing content with 'rachel m is the cooliest girl in the entire world cuz she rocks and she likes puppies.' on 2007-09-27T21:14:11+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 21:14, 27 September 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nicholas, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Last warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 13:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to 9/11 conspiracy theories has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Majorly (talk) 14:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Demonstrative, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 16:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to April 11, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 16:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Your recent edit to History of the camera (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Darius Washington Jr.. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Darius Washington Jr. was changed by 216.37.64.100 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-27T14:42:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Brian Piccolo, you will be blocked from editing. Dawn bard (talk) 14:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the June 16 page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to April 13, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to November 19. J.delanoygabsadds 17:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 17:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)