User talk:216.228.47.254

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Talk:Bastille

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments; this is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --saimhe 21:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] South Dakota v. Dole

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to South Dakota v. Dole, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -WarthogDemon 19:27, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to South Dakota v. Dole, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: South Dakota v. Dole was changed by 216.228.47.254 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-10-05T16:58:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 16:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Finding Nemo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Ecuador worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --barneca (talk) 17:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Brown (abolitionist), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Brown (abolitionist) was changed by 216.228.47.254 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-02-19T21:40:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Finding Nemo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Addshore (talk) 17:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to HTTP cookie, you will be blocked from editing. Urban Rose 15:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Davewild (talk) 18:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to A Tale of Two Cities has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 17:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to A Tale of Two Cities constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 17:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC))

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Katz v. United States. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. JaGa (talk) 15:12, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Debs v. United States, you will be blocked from editing. JaGa (talk) 15:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Bahamas, you will be blocked from editing. JaGa (talk) 15:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.