User talk:216.205.224.10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 216.205.224.10, is registered to 20th Century Fox, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

See also User talk:216.205.224.11.

Contents

2004

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- 20:49, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

2005

Please stop inserting commercial links like the real estate site you are putting into the Pasadena, California article. Those links do not belong in Wikipedia. Thanks. -EDM 22:51, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

April 2006

Your recent edit to Jake Zim was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 19:05, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Pilot|guy 19:06, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

May 2006

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Eivindt@c 23:58, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page February on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Saaber 18:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Pegasus1138. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. :) Dlohcierekim 23:41, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

June 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Andrew Reynolds, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Liface 21:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to January 23, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Fabricationary 22:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to December 26, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Fabricationary 22:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Joyous! | Talk 20:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Cumulus Robotics, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. -- Scientizzle 21:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Block

You have been blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating policy against vandalism and removing warnings/notes. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.
Note to sysops: Unblocking yourself should almost never be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator. Rx StrangeLove 23:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Do not disrupt Wikipedia. Adding a {{hoax}} tag to East Timor is just you violating WP:POINT because you didn't like that your hoax articles were removed. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to East Timor, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Scientizzle 18:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Ditto with Benque Viejo del Carmen.
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Benque Viejo del Carmen, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Scientizzle 18:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Portmanteau on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Peripitus (Talk) 22:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

July 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Three Laws of Robotics. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- Steel 22:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:40, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 22:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:51, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Reblock

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, please refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. -- Infrogmation 01:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Pilotguy (roger that) 18:16, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Unblock request

Request reason: "(This block has gone on for far too long)"
I think you'll find it is the vandalism which has gone on for too long. --pgk(talk) 20:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
You are permanently banning an entire company's IP because one or two users in the entire company are vandalizing. That seems a tad bit autocratic, and dare I say, unfair to the other 29,998 employees of Twentieth Century Fox. Don't you think?216.205.224.10 17:00, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

No I don't. Please log in if you wish to edit. --Pilotguy (roger that) 01:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Now you're just being ridiculous. There are maybe 1 or 2 user vandalizing from this IP range, and 30,000 other freaking innocent users being cut off. This is why people accuse you admins of having become corrupt and fascist -- you make fascist decisions like these every day, and enforce them arbitrarily. 216.205.224.10 17:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry. You're welcome to register. I'll make sure this is enabled. --Pilotguy (roger that) 19:41, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

I've tried to register, and it keeps saying this IP has reached its 6-name limit for the day. I certainly haven't created an account today, and prior to your enabling the creation of accounts at this IP, I don't believe it was possible. Is there any way to reset the counter, or do something? 216.205.224.10 19:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
"You are permanently banning an entire company's IP", the company should take responsibility for the use of their equipment. Here's an idea, why don't you contact your network people, get them to compare there logs to the time of the vandalism, find the idiots responsible and get their manager to do something about their abuse of the companies network facilities. No vandalism = No blocks. --pgk(talk) 20:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

July 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Bird, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk 14:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Arizona State University. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. JodyB yak, yak, yak 22:59, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Allnighter (film), you will be blocked from editing. A Softer Answer 17:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Intelligent design. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:36, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Intelligent design, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Anon editing via this ip# reblocked due to continuing vandalism. -- Infrogmation 18:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Daniel Lichtblau do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'youtube\.com' (link(s): http://youtube.com/watch?v=3afaYC9q56E) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 22:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to David Schults, you will be blocked from editing. Gromlakh (talk) 07:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to New York Rangers, you will be blocked from editing. -Djsasso (talk) 20:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Aryan Brotherhood, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Quaeler (talk) 18:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Francis Fukuyama, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Quaeler (talk) 18:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Six Flags, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Six Flags was changed by 216.205.224.10 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-12T17:44:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)