User talk:216.20.118.37

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 216.20.118.37, is registered to Merrimack Education Center and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] Note to instructors at Merrimack Education Center

It seems that those using this IP are frequently vandalizing Wikipedia, with very few choosing to make constructive edits. This IP might be blocked from editing for extended periods due to the negative actions of a few. I will be happy to unblock this IP upon request from any teacher or administrator from the Merrimack Education Center. I will require verification of identity, which can be as simple as e-mailing me and letting me know which address listed on the Center's contact page I can use to correspond directly with you. I usually only check e-mail once a day, so please be patient. If you require a faster response, feel free to contact any administrator. Thank you. SWAdair | Talk 07:51, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)


Please don't add nonsense to articles. We count it as vandalism and you could be blocked from editing if you continue. Secretlondon 18:31, Dec 1, 2003 (UTC)

The above is still valid - stop adding nonsense. andy 13:16, 23 Jan 2004 (UTC)

If you continue to create nonsense edits you will be blocked from editing in Wikipedia. - Tεxτurε 19:11, 4 May 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Infrogmation 21:16, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This is a hardcore vandal, consistently at work over the past year. All edits back to 4 May 2004 have been reverted by responsible Wikipedians. Furtive vandalism pre May 2004 may remain uncorrected (See User contributions). This vandal should be blocked, as a courtesy to hardworking Wikipedia editors. --Wetman 22:06, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

--ElTyrant 18:10, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Gamaliel 18:19, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (this time for 48 hours) Niteowlneils 03:57, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I asked you will get blocked indefinitely. Pavel Vozenilek 18:06, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Congratulations! You have made my watchlist -- bad for you, bad for me. The good news is that neither of us have to worry about it for 96 hours. You have been blocked for 96 hours for repeat vandalism. Take some time and enjoy the weekend. We welcome constructive edits from you after the block expires. SWAdair | Talk 11:41, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 8 days for repeat vandalism after the last block expired. We welcome constructive edits from you after the block expires. SWAdair | Talk 03:52, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] New messages

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. jni 17:43, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 7 days for repeat vandalism. We welcome constructive edits from you after the block expires. SWAdair | Talk 10:04, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)


[edit] New vandalism

Thanks for your edit to Leet. Your translation edit is not original, and has been tried here before. This is English Wikipedia and we have a convention that articles are in English. However, thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you wat to do, or look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --RobertG ♬ talk 16:29, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.--Durin 16:24, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Vanadalism to U.S. Highway 66

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. N0YKG 16:54, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] November 2005


Regarding the page Allen Ginsburg: This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nlu 21:16, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] December 2005

Regarding the page Condoleezza Rice: This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nlu (talk) 16:09, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] February 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Cannabis. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. GraemeL (talk) 14:02, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to New Deal, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Powers 13:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Darth Vader]], you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Malthusian (talk) 13:49, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

 Attention:
With your recent edit to American Revolution, you have returned to vandalising Wikipedia after being blocked from editing either once or more times. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia, for an extended period of time.

Image:Weather rain.pngSoothingR 17:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Due to vandalism, you have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. — FireFox • T • 17:32, 15 February 2006

[edit] March 2006

Alright, regarding the Jack London article, cut it out now. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:46, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. No Guru 18:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Blocked. Due to vandalism, you have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia. NoSeptember talk 13:24, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Rory096 16:33, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

Ian13/talk 16:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AnnH ♫ 16:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC)


A tag has been placed on Ferraz Shawmut, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. cholmes75 (chit chat) 13:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)