User talk:216.194.62.27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Independence Party of New York. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Michaelas10 (T|C) 18:51, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Independence Party of New York. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries.

DJ Silverfish 19:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Independence Party of New York

I reverted your edit to Independence Party of New York, because your edit summary did not include the an explanation of the edit. You'll need to justify this on the Talk page for the Independence Party of New York. In particular, I'm concerned that the deletion of Independent (politics) as the ideology of the party is unwarranted. Does the party have no ideology; is there no ideology that adequately expresses the positions of the party; or do you disagree with the use of "Independent" to describe an ideology, in general? It would be better to clarify the link (or the article it links to) than to simply delete it. Somebody will just restore it sooner or later. DJ Silverfish 19:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)