User talk:216.185.29.69

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 216.185.29.69, is registered to Free Library of Philadelphia, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to North Korea. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] November 2007

When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. BencherliteTalk 21:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Philadelphia Police Department, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Philadelphia Police Department was changed by 216.185.29.69 (c) (t) deleting 21480 characters on 2007-11-20T16:07:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Uruguay, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 19:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Acetic acid, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Acetic acid was changed by 216.185.29.69 (c) (t) deleting 38788 characters on 2007-12-06T15:19:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cunt, you will be blocked from editing. --Rodhullandemu (please reply here - contribs) 16:51, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Legalism (Chinese philosophy), even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Phoenix-wiki 21:03, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Nazi (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:25, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Animals in space. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. {{{2}}} Will (talk) 21:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Missouri Compromise. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 23:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Segregation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 23:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Dog (zodiac) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC))


[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Oscar Wilde, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Darkspots (talk) 22:52, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to East Coast hip hop. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: East Coast hip hop was changed by 216.185.29.69 (u) (t) deleting 35936 characters on 2008-03-05T20:25:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Otterathome. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. EJF (talk) 20:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Template:Contains Chinese text, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Badagnani (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hilary Swank, you will be blocked from editing. SpencerT♦C 21:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Philadelphia Police Department, you will be blocked from editing. --Oxymoron83 17:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] [[{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}|{{{User}}}]]

[{{fullurl:{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit&section=4}} Voice your opinion] ([[{{subst:TALKPAGENAME}}|talk page]]) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end {{subst:#time: H:i, j F Y "(UTC)"|+7 days}}

[[::User:{{{User}}}|{{{User}}}]] ([[::User talk:{{{User}}}|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/{{{User}}}|contribs]]) - {{{Description}}}

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:


[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
A:
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A:
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A:

[edit] General comments

RfAs for this user:
Requests for adminship/Example

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review [[Special:Contributions/{{{User}}}]] before commenting.

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Support

[edit] Oppose

[edit] Neutral

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Rosemary Barkett has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  Moo  Chat  20:21, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Rosemary Barkett, you will be blocked from editing. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 20:22, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Darod has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Thingg⊕⊗ 17:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Block

You are blocked 3 months for socking, see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/South Philly (3rd) — Rlevse • Talk • 00:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)