User talk:216.166.78.9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:
This IP address, 216.166.78.9, is registered to Yokubaitis Holding Corporation. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact Yokubaitis Holding Corporation to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, Yokubaitis Holding Corporation, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

Please do not vandalize Wikipedia. Your edits have been reverted back to an accurate revison. If this is your first warning, please do not add unhelpful content again. Instead, experiment in the sandbox. If not, continuing this practice could result in a block from editing from an administrator. Arknascar44 ¡Hablar Conmigo! 01:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] June 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Charizard. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oxymoron83 20:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] July 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Boy Abunda, you will be blocked from editing. Burzmali 23:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Philippines

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Philippines page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Howard the Duck 02:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Gyarados, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Smokizzy (talk) 20:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] List of Pokémon (1-20)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to List of Pokémon (1-20), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -WarthogDemon 17:23, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of Pokémon (141-160)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to List of Pokémon (141-160), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -WarthogDemon 23:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 31 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.31 hoursAnthony.bradbury"talk" 22:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance, you will be blocked from editing. Infernal Inferno 18:31, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Payroll, you will be blocked from editing. Kudret abi 05:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Regarding edits to Kim Chiu

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 216.166.78.9! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule img[0-9]+\.imageshack\.us/img[0-9]+/.*\.(jpg|jpeg|gif|png|svg), is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 04:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Advanced Audio Coding, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Advanced Audio Coding was changed by 216.166.78.9 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-10-27T05:46:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 05:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpupet my a$$

What the hell are you talking about!? I'm not a sockpuppet of crap! I'm not related to A.R. in any way! Hey, I have an idea, instead of wasting your fucking time trying to get me blocked for no reason, why don't you go somewhere else, where you won't annoy someone.Green Kirby 22:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, its quite ignorant to yell "SOCK" without any reason, i've been here since January, i know who Anubiz is, and i'm not him, nor am I Green Kirby. Stop stirring up controversey and do something worthwhile. Atomic Religione 00:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 14:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Uncivil edits

Your edits about Green Kirby are uncivil and borderline attacks. Please stop mkaing them, Green Kirby already seems to have enough people hating him as it is. Atomic Religione 15:40, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Nobody hates him. Some provoke him for fun, others question his intentions on WP.--91.121.83.168 16:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Personally I think he intends to be the biggest pest on Wikipedia while still making people think he's a sweet, innocent 13 year old who can't help but make mistakes (and LOTS of them). Why can't he be like the 14 year old Atomic Religione? At least he's more mature, doesn't bug other editors all the time and knows the importance of time and place. (Sorry I accused you of being a sock earlier Atomic, but when I went over your edits you definitely CANNOT be the same person as that simple-minded Green Kirby.) 216.166.78.9 16:51, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Well at least you know i'm not his sock now, but I shall leave you alone now, your Green kirby's problem now. Atomic Religione 16:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Maybe I should take it easier on Green Kirby. He probably has some sort of mental disorder, or maybe he's slightly retarded or something. 216.166.78.9 16:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Um, maybe he's just a lonely kid. He expressed multiple times on his talk page his desire to get new messages. Stop trolling.--91.121.83.168 17:05, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
That's the thing, see? He's still treating Wikipedia like a social networking site or forum. He might as well go to smashwiki or one of the thousands of game site forums instead. Perhaps he can find other lonely, obsessive souls there. 216.166.78.9 17:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Wait some time to see if things change. Wonders do happen.--91.121.83.168 17:21, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I hope you're right. He just needs to learn to not be so self-centered and obsessed with Wikipedia. 216.166.78.9 18:01, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm trying. Stop insulting me. I'm not attention seeking, or any of that crap. If people would stop giving me a hard time, like accusing me of a attention seeking brat, mabey I would improve.Green Kirby 23:30, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Uh-huh. So it wasn't you who wrote: I want a new meassage! or don't you just love getting a new meassage. You know, looking on wikipedia, and suddenly seeing a big orange thing on the top of your page, saying that you have a new meassage.? You did not nag User:Alison on her Irish Wikipedia user page to unblock your site so you could proclaim you would not post anymore? Right.

I have some advice for you:
  • You're on the internet. It brings the worst out in many people. Get accustomed to it. Ignore it. Don't swear. If it is on your own talk page, you are allowed to delete it.
  • Use talk pages only when necessary. It is necessary when it relates to edits on an article.
  • Use user talk pages only when necessary. It is necessary when it relates to that editor's work on articles.
  • Read things up! There are many guidelines; their names start with "Wikipedia:". They ideally represent the consensus of all editors on Wikipedia. There are help pages ("Help:") which come in handy as well. Whenever someone writes you a blue link, he expects you to read the page behind it.
  • You want to become a better editor. So start editing. For that it may be a good start to read this, I reckon: Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles
--91.121.83.168 02:11, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Atheism

Is your whole family atheist? That's kinda sad, as more and more atheists appear to be popping up. I still respect your decision though, as long as you are still a moral and decent person. Some other atheists I've known have no regard for human lives or the happiness of others. 216.166.78.9 18:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Atheism, isnt to uncommon in the United States, I myself, am atheist, and i find it best to simply not discuss my religion (or lack there of) with other religious people, les I offend them. Athiests arent monsters, those are the Satanists. Atomic Religione 19:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

It would be a little better if you guys were agnostic instead, but anything's better than being a Satanist or a hypocritical terrorist Muslim. 216.166.78.9 20:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I can not speak for the rest of my family but yes, I am an atheist. I personally do not see how God can exist, but that is my belief and neither intended to reflect anyone else or aggravate them. Freedom of religion is a beautiful thing; people can choose to be Christian, Catholic, Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist, Atheist, Agnostic, Lutheran, Protestant, Pagan, Wiccan, or any of themillions of other religions that exist, without fear of persecution because of it.
I am aware of the difference between an athiest and an agnostic, and yes I am the former; that is my choice. While I do not believe in God/Allah/Yahweh/etc, I do respect the comfort it gives to others. I do not blame religion for any troubles in the world (such as the terrorism that you have mentioned above). I blame an inability to co-operate with others, or see past one religion to address deeper problems. In other words, I blame intolerance.
I am not religious, but I do respect religion. People are free to be in whatever religion they choose, whether it be Catholicism or Satanism, Atheism or Islam, and I really don't care what religion a person is so long as they treat me with the same respect that I treat them. Please do not post derogatory comments such as anything's better than being a Satanist or a hypocritical terrorist Muslim on my talk page. MelicansMatkin 20:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't mean to put down just the Muslims; actually when it comes to any religion, being a hypocrite is probably the worst thing you can be as you are intentionally deceiving others to further your own interests. At least you are being honest by admitting you are an atheist. And Satanism is generally always associated with evil acts and malicious intent, so I give them no quarter. Have you ever seen a charitable Satanist? 216.166.78.9 20:41, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I have neither seen nor met a Satanist. I have no opinion on Satanism, or on any other individual religion. My only opinion is that people should be free to choose what religion fits them best, and they should not act intolerantly to others just because they have different opinions. MelicansMatkin 20:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
The problem is, Satanism actually promotes the attacking and ridicule of one's enemies, and the satisfying of one's own carnal desires. Here's a description from the article on Satanism: "small religious group that is unrelated to any other faith, and whose members feel free to satisfy their urges responsibly, exhibit kindness to their friends, and attack their enemies". It's a very self-centered, self-serving philosophy so most moral people would likely have a strong distaste for it, atheist or not. 216.166.78.9 20:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
This is not a debate on the merits of one religion over another; my talk page is not the place if that is what you are looking for. As for the quote you provided, it could be applied to everyday life. Lets look over it. ...Members feel free to satisfy their urges responsibly: what if you're trying to quite smoking? You keep getting the urge to light one up, but you cut back slowly until the cravings are gone. Is that Satanistic? ...Exhibit kindness to their friends: who isn't kind to their friends? Isn't that one of the foundations of friendship, kindness? ...and attack their enemies: Have you ever been bullied? If so, haven't you just wanted, just wished that you could get back at your tormentor? Is that not revenge? Does that make you a Satanist?
I'm not debating the merits of one religion over another, and I really don't care to continue with this discussion. A person's religion is their personal choice. Each one has merits and demerits. I really have nothing more to say on this. MelicansMatkin 21:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
My apologies, I won't bug you again, unless I need help making edits or something. 216.166.78.9 21:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm always happy to help a user out if it is related to editing Wikipedia. :) MelicansMatkin 21:17, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Green Kirby

Look, I'm trying to improve, but certain problems have stressed me out. You know, being called gay and being called fucked in the head from a user who I tried to help, being blocked for a week because of my dad, being called ugly, being suspected of sockpuppety from a user who I don't even know, being called retarded, being called an attention seeking brat, stuff like that. It's not easy being a user on Wikipedia. I'm not retarded, nor am I an attention seeking brat.(allthough I am attention seeking when it comes to hot girls, but that's another story.)Anyway, instead of accusing me of being a brat, and being retarted, you could try to help me to become a better user on Wikipedia.Green Kirby 23:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Editor. You mean becoming a better editor on Wikipedia, right? Because that's what Wikipedia is about: Articles. Not talk pages, not user pages, not user talk pages, and so on. All those things are just so editors can coordinate their work on articles. In an ideal wiki, at least. Also, please read up what I wrote two sections upwards.--91.121.83.168 02:11, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Editor, user, whatever. So what if I like getting a new meassage? Big deal. Lately, I have been searching for edits to make, but I have'nt found many edits worth making. The point is, I'm trying, and I deserve some credit for that.Green Kirby 07:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
No, not whatever. You still are much too much talk for much too little article edits. Obviously, you don't try very hard, so no credit from me. When looking at your latest edits, I see many unnecessary comments on mostly user talk pages. If you haven't realised, that's the thing that got you blocked in the first place. What's this? Stop pestering that editor, she made it clear she does not want to have chit-chat with you. Because I reckon you don't want to talk to her about article work. And this one; you should get that people likely get even more enraged when they get lessoned by kids, so your "help" backfires most of the times. When I said, you talk to other editors on their page about their edits, I did not mean something like this. That was totally unnecessary, just like those jokes on your user page; granted, you did not start that. On a side note, you can always look up the edits of any editor, be he registered or not, by using this special page. For every editor, there's a shortcut to his contributions on the left called "User contributions".
Once again, don't write on talk pages, unless it has to do with article work! Every edit means another version of that page, which costs hard disk space, which costs money. And if you suggest something on talk pages, you should not expect anybody to fall down on his knees in the light of your wisdom, be modest. Not like: "Hey, listen!". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.121.83.168 (talk) 21:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
The best way to teach Green Kirby a lesson is to simply ignore him and any inane comments he comes up with. Then instead of being a pest and eating up Wikipedia's storage space, he can play Smash Bros. Melee all day long with his other testosterone-driven pals. Come back once you get to college, kid. By then both your EQ and IQ should be sufficient enough that people might actually LIKE you.

By the way what's a meassage? Some new type of deli meat?


Please do not make personal attacks as you did at User talk:Green Kirby. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Corvus cornix 22:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Just remember civility. Corvus cornix 22:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Why don't you shut up and someone might actualy LIKE you! Why am I being treated this way? All you negative emo people have done is point out my bad edits. So any of you people who just want to ruine my day, GO TO HELL! Now, those of you who actualy want to help me, all you have done is point out my bad edits. Have you ever thought that mabey I have made some good edits? Oh wait, of course not! You people just want to make me look bad until I get so upset that I'll run away from the computer! Well I got some news for you, IT'S NOT WORKING! Just because I'm 13 dose'nt mean I'm an emotional coward. All of you who think that are idiots. Now I just want to say that I have made some good edits, in which you negative people have idiocticly ignored. I made a very good edit on Dwayne Hick's article. I explained that Boba Fett survived Return of the Jedi. But of course you don't think of that. All that matters to you is the negative stuff. Now it's not easy for me to write this, because I'm almost certain I'll get blocked for this, but I just want to say instead of pointing out the bad things I've done and try to make me sad, you could point out the good things I've done and encourage me to do better. It would no longer make the world half suicidal.Green Kirby 01:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
If nobody pointed out your flaws, how would you learn about them? You'd go on and on, making the same mistakes over and over again. What good would that be? That's what criticism is for, and criticism is what you will get most of the time on your talk page, once you've started editing more. That's how it rolls, deal with it.--91.121.83.168 01:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Calling Green Kirby a "attention seeking brat" isn't what i'd call constructive critism. Green Kirby isn't the only one in the wrong here. Atomic Religione 02:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Are you referring to me?--91.121.83.168 02:36, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
No. He's refering to the user who called me that on A.R.'S talk page. See it. it's titled 'Green Kirby". Anyway, I understand you pointing out my problems, but I think you could say it in a slightly polite manner. In other words, not saying that nobody likes me and I should go to college first, or not saying I'm an attention seeking brat, because in my opinion, that is refered to as an 'insult'. You not only critisise what I say, but you also criticise me in general.Green Kirby 02:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Wrong. Read more carefully, that wasn't me.--91.121.83.168 03:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm not talking to you. I'm talking to users who critiscise me in general. Stop making yourself look so inocent.Green Kirby 03:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cheeseburger, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cheeseburger was changed by 216.166.78.9 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-15T05:17:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 05:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dell, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Astroview120mm 05:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. SorryGuy 05:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Hmm so you call Green Kirby a nussiance yet you are vandalising articles, and if you didnt make those dits consider making an account. Atomic Religione 05:16, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Ha! At least I make some good edits.Green Kirby 13:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cueshé, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cueshé was changed by 216.166.78.9 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-19T14:45:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cueshé, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 14:57, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Cueshé, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 14:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Your repeated efforts to vandalize articles makes it seem that you are unaware that Wikipedia is a serious project. You have been reported to the administration group for continuing vandalism and an administrator will review your contributions shortly. You may not receive another warning before being blocked, so be careful and be serious from now on. If you are blocked, please reconsider your behavior once the block expires. --Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 14:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Oxymoron83 15:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

[edit] December 19

With regard to your comments on User:Sukecchi: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. MelicansMatkin (talk) 02:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] About Sukecchi

That was no personal attack, it really is the truth! 216.166.78.9 (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I highly doubt that. It is generally considered bad faith to edit another user's userpage, so I encourage you not to do so again. MelicansMatkin (talk) 03:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh ok, but he really IS gay though. I'm sure you've seen his userboxes. 216.166.78.9 (talk) 03:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
I have. Your point? MelicansMatkin (talk) 03:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

You there, yes you, the anonymous IP. Mind your own business please. -Sukecchi (talk) 01:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Coral Springs, Florida

I have reverted your addition of the trivia section to the article for two reasons:

1. Trivia sections are discouraged. See Wikipedia:Trivia sections (a part of Wikipedia's Manual of Style).

2. The information about New Found Glory is already in the article, in the Media and Culture section (at the end of the third paragraph).

Horologium (talk) 16:25, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tau Gamma Phi, you will be blocked from editing. Bgwwlm (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Male prostitution, you will be blocked from editing. --Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 05:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tau Gamma Phi and Ralph Recto

Remember that Wikipedia is committed to maintaining a neutral point of view (NPOV). A list in another article isn't the place to add critical information, as you did in Tau Gamma Phi. This information does belong in the main Ralph Recto article, but must be stated in encyclopedic terms. For example, you could rephrase your contribution as "Many Filipino people were dissatisfied with the Extended Value Added Tax Law, which he authored; some political experts believe that this law was a major factor in his failed re-election bid." You should then cite sources for these statements. If you can't cite a source, then it probably fits more into the category of personal opinion and speculation, which aren't the kind of content Wikipedia is looking for. Bgwwlm (talk) 13:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 weeks. for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. · AndonicO Hail! 20:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Miss, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Miss was changed by 216.166.78.9 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-03-23T23:30:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:30, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to BNC connector. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bakilas (talk) 04:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Marié Digby has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:37, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Marié Digby constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Macy (Review me!) 23:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC))


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 6 Cycle Mind, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: 6 Cycle Mind was changed by 216.166.78.9 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-05-06T22:22:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Optimus Prime, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Optimus Prime was changed by 216.166.78.9 (u) (t) deleting 27158 characters on 2008-05-12T04:41:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Amadeo, Cavite has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Razorflame 00:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Amadeo, Cavite constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Razorflame 00:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Amadeo, Cavite. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Razorflame 00:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Brandon Vera, you will be blocked from editing. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 10:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)