User talk:216.120.198.178

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] 2006 October

Thank you for experimenting with the page Great Flood of 1993 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to 2007 in NASCAR

Thank you for your contributions, but we are trying to keep speculative information out of the "Expected Entries" list. At this point, the rumors of the National Guard leaving Biffle's car for the #25 are several months old, and we haven't heard anything official one way or the other. -- DiegoTehMexican 20:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2006 October

Thank you for experimenting with the page List of people by name: Stu on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
--Jerzy•t 04:17, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Cameron Hawkins

Your recent edit to Cameron Hawkins (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:43, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cameron Hawkins

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Cameron Hawkins, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Rob C (Alarob) 17:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Vandalism

Your recent edit to Frog was determined to be unhelpful and, in fact, pretty unoriginal. Lots of other kids have been doing the same dumb thing for ages, and it gets a little old. So, please: think of something a little more interesting before you vandalize another page. Or, better yet, stop vandalizing pages and start adding something worthwhile to the project. Thanks! Kafziel Talk 18:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Mucus, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Kafziel Talk 18:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Frog, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Opelio 18:55, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eastern Timber Wolf

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica) 19:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stem cell

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. (aeropagitica) 18:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nome (Egypt)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.

[edit] March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Gray Wolf, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- GJD 17:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)



[edit] March 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Recording studio, you will be blocked from editing. Leafyplant 17:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

The recent edit you made to Baboon constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks – Qxz 17:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Beaver. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing – Qxz 17:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hand, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 17:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Drug policy of the Netherlands, you will be blocked from editing. Apple••w••o••r••m•• 14:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 15:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 17 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Popsicle. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Riana ऋ 14:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Indigenous peoples of the Americas (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:52, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image talk:GreeneRobert-48LawsOfPower.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image talk:GreeneRobert-48LawsOfPower.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. OsamaK 11:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to John Brown (abolitionist):

Your recent edit to John Brown (abolitionist) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 14:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism to John Brown (abolitionist)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Brown (abolitionist), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your changes have been automatically reverted by CounterVandalismBot. If this is a mistake, please report it. Thank you. CounterVandalismBot 14:33, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism to California Girls

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

[edit] January 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Happiness, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 15:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Chanel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 19:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to History of Iraq has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 15:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Dizzy Gillespie has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 17:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chicago White Sox, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chicago White Sox was changed by 216.120.198.178 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-05-13T17:08:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:08, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bishop of Rome. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bishop of Rome was changed by 216.120.198.178 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-13T17:14:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Hector Guerrero has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ——Ryan | t • c 17:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)